Cases

WORTHINGTON, J, Plaintiff, Chong Suk Cha Jenkins (Wife) and defendant, Allan Paul Jenkins (Husband) were married on May 27, 1981. On November 28, 1994, the parties entered into a “post-nuptial agreement.” They did not physically separate until August of2000. OnNovember 9,2001, Wife filed a complaint requesting a divorce pursuant to section 3301(c) ofthe Pennsylvania Divorce Code. OnFebruary 13,2004, Wife filed a motion t

MEMORANDUM ** Washington state prisoner Sidney Donald Jenkins, III, appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition, challenging his 1999 conviction for first degree felony murder. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. Appellant contends that his double jeopardy rights were violated when the trial

[Cite as Monroe v. Monroe, 2023-Ohio-3332.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COLUMBIANA COUNTY JOHN JAMES MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KIMBERLY ANN MONROE, Defendant-Appellant.

hWILLIAMS, Judge. The' defendants, Joe B. Bradley and American International South Insurance Company (“American”), appeal a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Woodrow Jenkins. The trial court awarded damages, penalties and attorney fees to plaintiff, finding that the. insurer’s failure to pay the plaintiffs reasonable transportation expenses was arbitrary. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS

Hines, Justice. A jury found Casey Jenkins guilty of felony murder while in the commission of aggravated assault in connection with the fatal shooting of Pete Howard, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Jenkins appeals, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred by giving the jury a sequential charge in violatio

KIRBY, Judge. 11 STATEMENT OF THE CASE By grand jury indictment dated June 5, 1997, Domingo Jenkins, also known as Mike Jenkins, and Louis Jenkins were charged with second degree murder; and, they pleaded not guilty. On February 2-3, 1998, defendants were tried together by a twelve-member jury that found them both guilty as charged. On February 17, 1998, the trial court denied both defendants’ motions for

DICKSON, Judge. Defendant David Monroe Jenkins was convicted of attempted murder1 and sentenced to thirty (30) years imprisonment. This direct appeal asserts two issues: insufficiency of evidence and excessive sentence. Defendant specifically urges that there was no evidence as to the mens rea. The necessary culpability for the offense of attempted murder may be either "knowin

People v Jenkins (2024 NY Slip Op 01627) People v Jenkins 2024 NY Slip Op 01627 Decided on March 22, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

O’BRIEN, J, I. FINDINGS OF FACT (1) On October 5,1992, Inspector Thomas Kochman, a United States Postal Inspector assigned to the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania office, was contacted by Inspector Keith Salter of the Postal Inspection Service, Philadelphia Division, and advised that an anonymous tip had been received regarding an “Express Mail” parcel alleging that it contained controlled substances.

PER CURIAM. Writs were granted in this case on the application of Katherine Jenkins, who represented that she was an indigent and unable to pay the fine imposed on her by the City Court of West Monroe, because of her indigency. Her application to us contained what purports to be the ruling of the city court judge: “The Court finds Katherine Jenkins to be willing to pay the *1039</

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-3371 JANIAH MONROE, et al., individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STEVEN BOWMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellants. ____________________

Jenkins v Alston (2018 NY Slip Op 04238) Jenkins v Alston 2018 NY Slip Op 04238 Decided on June 8, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF MORTGAGES LTD. RANDOLPH J. HAINES, Bankruptcy Judge. The issue here is whether various mechanics’ lien claimants, who claim priority dating from the commencement of construction in November 2006, have priority over a construction deed of trust that was recorded in May of 2007. Among other defenses, the construction lender asserts the doctri

PATTERSON, Justice: This is an appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Jefferson County which sustained the demurrer of defendants and dismissed the cause. The issue before the Court is whether a municipality retains immunity from liability for actions of its agents engaged in necessary governmental functions. It is the opinion of the Court that all issues presented are controlled by Anderso

John A. Fogleman, Justice. On this appeal, appellants seeks to sustain service of process on the appellee-defendant (under the “longarm” provisions of the Uniform Interstate and International Procedure Act [Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2501 — 2507 (Supp. 1973)]) in her divorce action. The chancery court denied appellant a divorce, holding that, even though appellee had actually received the notice given, service o

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-17-00118-CR ___________________________ RONNIE JAMES MONROE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 2 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1491623R Before Sudderth, C.J.; Meier and Kerr, JJ. Opinion by Justice Meier

STATE OF LOUISIANA * NO. 2018-KA-0253 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL DOMINIQUE JENKINS * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COUR

STOCKARD, Commissioner. On December 1, 1959, James Monroe Jenkins was charged by one information (Case No. 33,379) with the offense of statutory rape, and by another information (Case No. 33,378) with the offense of stealing an automobile. On the same day two well known and respected members *442of the bar were appointed to represent him. On July 10, 1961, in open cou

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John R. Schwartz, A.J.), rendered May 5, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Garni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. This is a diversity action wherein an insured brought suit against his insurer on certain health insurance policies. Max Monroe, a citizen and resident of Oklahoma, had three such policies with Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation. Two of these policies contained the following language stamped in red ink on the front page of each p