Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STANLEY A. SANSONE ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-02470 (UNA) ) UNITED STATES PATENT ) AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al., )

806 A.2d 482 (2002) THE AINJAR TRUST, John O. Vartan, Trustee, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Susquehanna Township and The McNaughton Company, Respondents. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued July 10, 2002. Decided August 28, 2002. *483 Thomas W. Scott, Harrisburg, for petitioner. David E. Le

791 A.2d 461 (2002) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Petitioner, v. NORTH AMERICAN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 4, 2001. Decided February 8, 2002. *462 Craig S. Lambeth, Harrisburg, for petitioner. Robert L. Byer, Pittsburgh, for respondent. Before SMIT

714 A.2d 502 (1998) Stanley STEWART, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and Department of Corrections, Respondents. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs April 9, 1998. Decided June 24, 1998. *503 Stanley Stewart, petitioner, for himself. Arthur R. Thomas, Harrisburg, for respondent

DOYLE, Judge. The Building Industry Association of Lancaster County (BIA) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, dismissing BIA’s declaratory judgment action, challenging an ordinance of Manheim Township which imposed an impact fee on developers. Manheim Township cross appeals from the order, challenging dicta in the common pleas opinion indicating that, if BIA had standing to bring its claim

858 A.2d 641 (2004) Geoffrey PUGH, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (TRANSPERSONNEL, INC.), Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs January 23, 2004. Decided August 11, 2004. Reargument Denied October 14, 2004. *643 Gerard K. Schrom and Neil E. Botel, Media, for petitio

841 A.2d 168 (2004) Charles ISELEY, Petitioner v. Jeffrey BEARD, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs December 19, 2003. Decided January 23, 2004. *169 Charles Iseley, petitioner, pro se. John J. Talaber, Camp Hill, for respondent. BEFORE: PELLEGRINI, Judge, and SIMPSON, Judge, and MIR

821 A.2d 1255 (2003) HARRISBURG AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 2, 2002. Decided April 29, 2003. *1256 Elizabeth A. Maguschak, Hazleton, for petitioner. Brian E. McDonough, Harrisburg, for respondent.

761 A.2d 1250 (2000) LANCASTER COUNTY, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 12, 2000. Decided October 24, 2000. *1251 Susan R. Friedman, Lancaster, for petitioner. James L. Crawford, Harrisburg, for respondent. Wendy D. Bowie, Harrisburg,

DOYLE, Judge. Before this Court in our original jurisdiction is the preliminary objection of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Governor Thomas J. Ridge, and Treasurer Catherine Baker Knoll1 (Respondents) to the “Complaint in Mandamus and Bill of Equity” filed by Gene Stilp.2 Stilp is a Pennsylvania citizen proceeding pro se, who filed this

710 A.2d 141 (1998) BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF LANCASTER COUNTY, Appellant, v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP. BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF LANCASTER COUNTY v. MANHEIM TOWNSHIP, Appellant. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 13, 1996. Decided April 14, 1998. *142 Loudon L. Campbell, Harrisburg, for appell

490 Pa. 444 (1980) 417 A.2d 121 I. Raymond KREMER, Charles P. Mirarchi, Jr. and Eugene Gelfand, et al. and The Pennsylvania Conference of State Trial Judges, Appellants, v. Alexander F. BARBIERI, Court Administrator of Pennsylvania and Robert E. Casey, State Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellees. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued Ap

MONTEMURO, Judge: In this appeal, our court is asked once again to delineate the scope of the power and authority of the Attorney General to prosecute criminal cases vis-a-vis the power and authority that is similarly vested in the district attorneys of the various counties. This controversy, like the mythological Phoenix, has repeatedly risen from the ashes renewed and regenerated; as many times as the courts and the legislat

441 Pa. Superior Ct. 1 (1995) 656 A.2d 890 Richard A. SPRAGUE, Appellant, v. Greg WALTER, Kent Pollock, Howard Shapiro, Eugene L. Roberts, Jr., Creed C. Black, Michael Pakenham, Aaron Epstein, Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. and Knight Newspapers, Inc. Richard A. SPRAGUE, v. Greg WALTER, Kent Pollock, Howard Shapiro, Eugene L. Roberts, Jr., Creed C. Black, Michael Pakenham, Aaron Epstein, Philadelphia Newspapers,

OPINION OF THE COURT WEIS, Circuit Judge. The Pennsylvania Constitution provides that public access to records of the Judicial Inquiry and Review Board is allowed only if it recommends that the state supreme court impose discipline on a judge or member of the minor judiciary. The district court found that the federal constitution requires public disclosure by the Board in every instance in which it conduc

579 F.Supp. 192 (1984) The FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION, Frederick J. Huysman and Daniel R. Biddle v. JUDICIAL INQUIRY AND REVIEW BOARD. Civ. A. No. 83-0579. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 1, 1984. As Amended February 22, 1984. *193 *194 Samuel E. Klein