Cases

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

62 F.3d 396 Millsv.Jones* NO. 94-30603 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. July 13, 1995 Appeal From: E.D.La., No. CA-94-1625-E 1 AFFIRMED.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 343 Appellant and cross-appellee, the village of Gates Mills appeals from the order of the trial court awarding attorney fees and interest in favor of appellee and cross-appellant David R. Jones et al. ("Jones"). Jones's appeal challenges the amount of the award ordered by the trial court. For the reasons set forth be

In re Mills, Shelia; — Plaintiff(s); applying for reconsideration of writ denial of November 19, 1993; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 86-3579. Reconsideration denied. HALL, J., not on panel.

In re Mills, Shelia; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 86-3579. Denied. HALL, J., not on panel.

240 P.3d 1097 (2010) 349 Or. 56 JONES v. MILLS. (S058688). Supreme Court of Oregon. September 17, 2010. Petition for review denied.

L.R. Jones, J.S.C. This case presents legal issues involving an alimony obligor’s loss of employment and interpretation of the recent, 2014 amendments to New Jersey’s alimony statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23(k). Specifically, defendant seeks a reduction of his alimony obligation to plaintiff based upon losing his prior long-term employment and subsequent obtaining of a new job at a significantly lower salary. In turn, plai

AFFIRMED.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 15, 2005 LARRY JOE JONES v. DAVID MILLS, WARDEN Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 5943 Joseph H. Walker, Judge No. W2005-01172-CCA-R3-HC - Filed December 5, 2005 The petitioner, Larry Joe Jones, appeals from the trial court’s summary d

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBI MILLS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) C.A. No. N24C-04-139 FJJ DAVID EFFRON and SHOCK TRAUMA ) ASSOCIATES, P.A., ) )

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON ERIC D. JONES v. DAVID MILLS, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 5829 Joe H. Walker III, Judge No. W2004-00855-CCA-R3-HC - July 23, 2004 The Petitioner, Eric D. Jones, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The State has filed a motion req

ORDER ON PARTIES’ COMPETING MOTIONS ON FACIAL PREEMPTION NANCY TORRESEN, Chief Judge. Before the Court are the parties’ competing motions for judgment on the plead*3ings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (ECF Nos. 46, 57). For the reasons stated below, the Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED and the Defendants’ motion is DENIED.

*39ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge. In this case, the Plaintiffs challenge the validity of certain 2013 amendments to the Maine Pharmacy Act (the “MPA”), 32 M.R.S. §§ 13701-13810. Before the Court is a motion brought by Defendants Janet Mills and H. Sawin Millett, Jr. (together, the “State”) to dismiss the complaint (ECF No. 17)

*964ante, p. 951; 566 U. S. 989; ante, p. 935; ante, p. 917; ante, p. 936; ante, p. 936; ante, p. 952; 566 U. S. 940; ante, p. 950; 566 U. S. 1023; 566 U. S. 101

Sutton, C. J. The first special ground of the motion for new trial shows that the defendant admitted a prima facie case and then assumed the burden of proof; and error is assigned on the court’s allowing the defendant to have the opening and conclusion of the argument before the jury. It does not appear that the plaintiff made any objection or asked for any ruling of the court when the defendant undertook to assume the burden of

350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf

213 Miss. 680 (1952) 56 So.2d 488 MILLS, et al. v. JONES. No. 38100. Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B. January 7, 1952. Snow & Covington, for appellants. Hardy Lott, for appellees. *681 Arrington, C. This is an appeal from the Circuit Court of Webster County affirming an aw

EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, A.J.: {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Arvella Mills appeals from the decision of the Cleveland Municipal Court granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee Cleveland Central Catholic High School ("Cleveland Central Catholic" or the "school") on its claims for the provision of necessaries under R.C. 3103.03(D) and unjust enrichment based on Mills' alleged failure to pay the balance due for her daughter's t

OPINION During the late evening hours of July 2, 2007, Officer Alex Sherwood, then of the Lockhart Police Department, 1 initiated a traffic stop on Robert Paul Mills after, Sherwood testified, he witnessed Mills making a right turn after Mills had failed to signal within one-hundred feet of the intersection. See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 545.104(b) (

Elmore, Judge. *547Triangle Yellow Transit, Inc., and its owner, Harold Dover, (collectively defendants) filed timely notice of appeal to this Court on 8 March 2013 from the 14 January 2013 Opinion and Award of the Full Commission (the Commission) and the 8 February 2013 order denying defendants’ motion to reconsider. After careful review, the Opinion and Award by the