Cases

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., MERCIER, J., and SENIOR JUDGE FULLER NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules September 19, 2025

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, January 23, 2025 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25D0198. BRANDI NICOLE DIXON v. MICHAEL LERAN MILLER. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy o

513 A.2d 597 (1986) Robert Rulon MILLER, v. DIXON INDUSTRIES CORPORATION et al. No. 83-463-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 21, 1986. *598 Joseph V. Cavanagh, Lawrence P. McCarthy, Higgins Cavanagh & Cooney, Providence, for plaintiff. Michael P. DeFanti, Hinckley Allen Tobin & Silverstein, Providence, fo

254 P.3d 751 (2011) 242 Or. App. 518 STATE v. MILLER-DIXON. A141612 Court of Appeals of Oregon. April 20, 2011. Affirmed without opinion.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. *985While in the presence of other inmates, petitioner loudly complained about the manner in which a pat frisk was conducted. He then threw himse

56 F.Supp.2d 289 (1999) Lawrence DIXON, Petitioner, v. Thomas J. MILLER, Acting Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. 97 CV 0532(NG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 14, 1999. *290 *291 *292 Georgia J. Hinde, New

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th of March 2018 by State of NC for Temporary Stay: "Motion Dissolved by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of August 2018." Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 7th of March 2018 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Co

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, February 09, 2026 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A26D0299. BRANDI NICOLE DIXON v. MICHAEL LERAN MILLER. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: CE2400348 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Ervin, J. Recused

127 N.W.2d 203 (1964) 176 Neb. 659 Ida MILLER, Appellee, v. Lloyd DIXON, Appellant. No. 35549. Supreme Court of Nebraska. March 20, 1964. C. Morris Gillespie, Kearney, for appellant. Nye & Wolf, Kearney, for appellee. Heard before WHITE, C. J., and CARTER, MESSMORE, YEAGER, SPENCER, BOSLAUGH and BROWER, JJ. BROWER, Ju

MAYER, Circuit Judge. Donald A. Dixon appeals the final judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) denying his motion to recall the mandate issued in a decision dismissing his appeal as untimely filed. See Dixon v. Shinseki, No. 08-1475, 2012 WL 3291861 (Vet.App. Aug. 14, 2012) (“Equitable Tolling Decisio

Miller, Judge. Daniel Dixon filed suit against Justin Wayne Krause, a police officer with the Greenville Police Department, in his individual and official capacities, and the City of Greenville (the “City”), raising state and federal claims for malicious prosecution and seeking attorney fees. The trial court granted summary judgment to Krause and the City, finding that the totalit

MCDONALD, Judge. Tramarus Dixon was charged with two counts of robbery in the first degree. He was convicted on one count and was acquitted of the other. On direct appeal, this court affirmed his conviction. See State v. Dixon , No. 12-1873, 2013 WL 640578

599 F.Supp. 395 (1984) Amos DIXON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey C. MILLER, etc., et al., Defendants. No. 77 C 1125. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. June 28, 1984. *396 AMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL BUA, District Judge. This cause coming to be heard on Plaintiffs' Motion for Voluntary Dism

551 F.3d 578 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus DIXON, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Carr, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 08-1438, 08-2008. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 24, 2008. Decided December 22, 2008.

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) DIXON V. DIXON NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). WILLIAM J. DIXON, JR., APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, V.

785 F.Supp.2d 746 (2011) Irene DIXON, Plaintiff, v. LADISH COMPANY, INC., Lawrence W. Bianchi, James C. Hill, Leon A. Kranz, Wayne E. Larsen, J. Robert Peart, John W. Splude, and Gary J. Vroman, Defendants. Case No. 10-CV-1076. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 30, 2011. *747 Francis P. McConville, Juan Montever

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge. In November 2010 Ladish Co. agreed to be acquired by Allegheny Technologies, Inc. The offer for each share of Ladish’s stock was $24 cash plus 0.4556 shares of Allegheny’s stock. At the closing price of Allegheny stock after the merger’s announcement, the package was worth $46.75 per Ladish share, a premium of 59% relative to Ladish’s trading price before

599 S.E.2d 284 (2004) 267 Ga.App. 320 The STATE v. DIXON. No. A04A0841. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 7, 2004. Gerald N. Blaney, Jr., Solicitor-General, Gary S. Vey, Assistant Solicitor-General, for appellant. Head, Thomas, Webb & Willis, Mark A. Hansford, Atlanta, for appellee. ELLINGTON, Judge. Wayne Dixon stands

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice. Appellants Carl S. ustice. appeal from a circuit court’s order denying a setoff or credit under the Mississippi Insurance Guaranty Association Law (“MIGA”), codified at Miss. Code Ann. § 83-23-101 etseq. (1999), for sums paid to Appellee Willie Dixon by his own insurance carrier and by his employer’s workers’ compensation carrier. We accepted certification of