⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “MILES v. 3M COMPANY”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-08-07 · Published · cited 5× · 111 F.4th 846
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-3031 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ex rel. KWAME RAOUL, Attor- ney General of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 3M COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal
Rath v. 3M Companypublic domain
Superior Court of Delaware · 2019-04-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WERNER RATH, ) Plaintiff, § v. § C.A. No. N17C-08-228 ASB 3M COMPANY, et al. § Defendants. § M Submitted: March 27, 2019 Decided: April 5, 2019 Upon Defendam Oyj Partek Ab ’s Motl`onfor Summary Judgment, GRANTED. Loreto P. Rufo, Esq., (arguea’) of Rufo Associates PA, Wilmington, Delaware. Attorneyfor Defena’ant Thomas C. Crumplar, Esq. (argued), of Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Donald P. Blydenburgh, Esq. and Patrick I. Andrews
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-09-16 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 Ohio 3198
[Cite as 131 Miles, L.L.C. v. 3M&B, L.L.C., 2021-Ohio-3198.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA 131 MILES, L.L.C., ET AL., : Plaintiffs, : No. 109558 v. : 3M&B, L.L.C., ET AL.,
Downs v. 3m Companypublic domain
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2010-01-05 · Published · cited 0×
CONSOLIDATED DECISION Before this Court are two motions to dismiss pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The Plaintiffs in these matters object to the motions and request guidance from this Court as to the application of Rhode Island Supreme Court opinionKedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 946 A.2d 1171 (R.I. 2008), to ongoing asbestos litigation. Due to simil
Hayden v. 3M Co.public domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-02-03 · Published · cited 2× · 211 So. 3d 528; 2016 La.App. 4 Cir. 1030; 2017 WL 462153; 2017 La. App. LEXIS 134
Judge Roland L. Belsome hln preparation for trial on this meso-thelioma case, the plaintiff served trial subpoenas on numerous defendant corporations for the in-court appearance of a corporate representative at trial. The defendant corporations filed motions to quash the subpoenas. The trial court granted the motions to quash as to the corporations that were not domiciled in Louisiana. The plaintiff filed an application for su
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2002-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-CA-01651-SCT 3M COMPANY f/k/a MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. SIMEON JOHNSON, JAMES CURRY, BOBBY JOE LAWRENCE AND PHILLIP PATE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/30/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JANNIE M. LEWIS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HOLMES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: DONN
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2010-09-29 · Published · cited 2× · 746 F. Supp. 2d 1216; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103000; 2010 WL 3835131
746 F.Supp.2d 1216 (2010) EMERALD COAST UTILITIES AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. 3M COMPANY, E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Solutia, Inc., and Fire Ram International, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 3:09cv361/MCR/MD. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. September 29, 2010. *1217 James Martin Corrigan, James M
3M Co. v. Johnsonpublic domain
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005-01-20 · Published · cited 45× · 895 So. 2d 151; 2005 WL 107134
895 So.2d 151 (2005) 3M COMPANY f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Simeon JOHNSON, James Curry, Bobby Joe Lawrence and Phillip Pate. No. 2002-CA-01651-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. January 20, 2005. Rehearing Denied March 24, 2005. *154 Donna Brown Jacobs, John C. Henegan, Jackson, W. Wayne
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016-09-20 · Published · cited 3× · 208 F. Supp. 3d 1227; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186030; 2016 WL 6584932
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ABDUL K. KALLON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The plaintiffs in this case are West Morgan-East Lawrence Water and Sewer Authority (the “Authority”), in its individual capacity, and Tommy Lindsey, Lanette Lindsey, and Larry Watkins (collectively “Representative Plaintiffs”), who bring this action both individually and on behalf of a class of persons similarly situated.
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2025-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 562 P.3d 1270
FILED January 30, 2025 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE JOUMANA B. AL HAYEK, and ) No. 39989-3
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004-06-30 · Published · cited 6× · 860 A.2d 1013; 373 N.J. Super. 172
860 A.2d 1013 (2004) 373 N.J. Super. 172 ISLAND MORTGAGES OF NEW JERSEY and Perennial Lawn Care, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. 3M (MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY), Defendant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic County. June 30, 2004. *1014 Daniel
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001-09-25 · Published · cited 4× · 176 F. Supp. 2d 911; 26 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2492; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20544; 2001 WL 1640127
176 F.Supp.2d 911 (2001) Jean E. WOLFE, Plaintiff, v. 3M SHORT-TERM DISABILITY PLAN and 3M Long-Term Disability Plan, Defendants. No. Civ. 99-1902 JRT/FLN. United States District Court, D. Minnesota. September 25, 2001. *912 Katherine L. MacKinnon, Mackinnon Law Office, St. Louis Park, MN, and Matthew B. Newman, Newman Law Office
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021-09-01 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Beverly Dale Jolly and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. General Electric Company, et al., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the Appellants. Appellate Case No. 2017-002611 Appeal From Spartanburg County Jean Hoefer Toal, Acting Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5858 Heard November 2, 2020 – Filed September 1, 2021
3M Co. v. Dunnpublic domain
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973-03-14 · Published · cited 1× · 50 Ala. App. 329; 279 So. 2d 132; 1973 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 436
*333ON REHEARING Appellee, in its application for rehearing, contends that this court improperly took judicial notice of the fact that “any point seven miles north of Satsuma on Highway 43 must be in Mobile and not Pike County.” In support of its contention, appellee cites us to the case of Waters v. State, 117 Ala. 189, 23 So. 28, wherein the Supreme Court said:
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-04-24 · Published · cited 0×
FiLED IN 5TH COURT OF APPEALS I5 fPR 2g PH g: gO CAUSE NO. QS-14-O151O-CV LISA &‘STZ. CIR< IN THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS TRENTS. GRIFFIN Appellant, V. AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY Appellee. On appeal from the
District Court, W.D. New York · 2002-08-29 · Published · cited 1× · 258 F. Supp. 2d 209; 33 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20051; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24839; 2002 WL 32082824
258 F.Supp.2d 209 (2002) John LESSORD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., et al., Defendants. No. 01-CV-6103. United States District Court, W.D. New York. August 29, 2002. *210 Alan J. Knauf, Knauf & Shaw LLP, Rochester, NY, for plaintiffs. S. Paul Battaglia, Bond, Schoeneck & King, Syracuse, NY, for Gene
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-11 · Published · cited 0×
FILED IN NO. 13-212 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/11/15 11:24:40 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk TAMI L. WOLE'F, C.S.R. PHONE: (830) 331-8286 NO. 13-212 ROBERTSON ELECTRIC, INC. ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT ) VS . ) 216TH JUD
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 13-15-00506-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 5/12/2016 3
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001-09-19 · Published · cited 225× · 265 F.3d 1371; 60 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1272; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20590; 2001 WL 1097021
BRYSON, Circuit Judge. Exxon Research and Engineering Co. is the assignee of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,292,705 (“the '705 patent”) and 5,348,982 (“the '982 patent”), which are directed to improvements in a method for converting natural gas into liquid hydrocarbon products. Exxon brought suit against the United States in the Court of Federal Claims, asserting that the government infring
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2006-01-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-01005-SCT E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. GLEN STRONG AND CONNIE STRONG DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/17/2006 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. BILLY JOE LANDRUM COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JONES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JOHN G. CORLEW DEBORAH DEROCHE KUCHLER