Cases

*795In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated June 4, 1998, the defendant appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Panepinto, J.), dated June 15, 2012, as denied that branch of her motion which was for an award of counsel fees, (2) from an order of the same court, also dated June 15, 2012, which denied h

*795In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated June 4, 1998, the defendant appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Panepinto, J.), dated June 15, 2012, as denied that branch of her motion which was for an award of counsel fees, (2) from an order of the same court, also dated June 15, 2012, which denied h

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Eanepinto, J.), dated September 16, 2011, which denied her motion to disqualify the court-appointed special referee. *778Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was no evidence of bias or

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Eanepinto, J.), dated September 16, 2011, which denied her motion to disqualify the court-appointed special referee. *778Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was no evidence of bias or

BENTON, Circuit Judge. James Thomas Cuthrell was denied disability benefits. The district court upheld the denial. He appeals, arguing that the Administrative Law Judge failed to use the psychiatric review technique, did not consider important medical evidence, and applied the incorrect standard to evaluate his residual functional capacity. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

ON PETITION FOR CERTIFICATION To the Appellate Division, Superior Court: A petition for certification of the judgment in A-000302-15 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same; It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is denied.

344 S.W.3d 689 (2009) 2009 Ark. App. 654 Michael A. HAYES, Appellant, v. Sandra L. OTTO, Appellee. No. CA 08-1486. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. October 7, 2009. Rehearing Denied November 18, 2009. *690 Michael A. Hayes, pro se appellant. Dodds, Kidd & Ryan, by: David W. Kamps,

16 A.3d 1028 (2011) 205 N.J. 522 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael HAYES, Defendant-Appellant. A-13 September Term 2010. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February 28, 2011. Decided March 31, 2011. *1029 Alison S. Perrone, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appe

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 9, 2007 MICHAEL J. HART v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-06-57 Roy Morgan, Judge No. W2006-00783-CCA-R3-PC - Filed March 15, 2007 The Appellant, Michael J. Hart, appeals the denial of his petition for post-con

341 S.W.3d 293 (2009) David L. HAYES v. STATE of Tennessee, et al. No. M2009-00371-COA-R3-CV. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville. Assigned on Briefs September 16, 2009. October 8, 2009. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court February 10, 2010. *294 D

ORDER LEGROME D. DAVIS, District Judge. AND NOW, this 28th day of June 2012, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendants Kenneth Easterday and Patricia Easterday for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47), Plaintiffs Response to Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 50), Exhibits to Response to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 52), Reply of' Defendants Kennet

GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge. The Hayes family receives enhanced voucher rental assistance from the federal government, and a federal statute provides that enhanced voucher holders "may elect to remain" in their housing developments, even after their landlord has opted out of *36 the fed

MEMORANDUM **** Elizabeth Hayes timely appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s partial denial of her claim for disability benefits. We reverse and remand to the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). I. The ALJ held that Hayes was “disabled” after her 55th birthday, but not before then. The ALJ’s holding rested on the conclusio

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See TeGrotenhuis v. Rice, 744 So.2d 1057, 1057-1058 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). STEVENSON, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

196 P.3d 612 (2008) 2008 UT App 371 Kathy J. BAUM, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Michael T. HAYES, Respondent and Appellee. No. 20070516-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. October 23, 2008. Stephen C. Clark and Kenneth A. Okazaki, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Sharon S. Sipes, Ogden, and James H. Woodall, South Jordan, for Appellee.

488 F.Supp.2d 560 (2007) Cathy H. HAYES, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 1:06CV00070. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Abingdon Division. June 7, 2007. *561 Deborah K. Garton, Hensley, Muth, Garton & Hayes, Bluefield, WV, for Plaintiff. Sara Bugbee Winn, Assi

MEMORANDUM **** Sherry A. Hayes (“Hayes”) appeals the district court’s order and judgment affirming an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying her application for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) payments under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse the district court’s order and judgment

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CASPER, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Judith M. Hayes (“Hayes”) has filed this lawsuit against CRGE Foxbor-ough, LLC (“CRGE”) alleging negligence, strict liability under Mass. Gen. L. e. 143 § 51 and violation of Mass. Gen. L. c. 93A related to Hayes’ alleged fall at Toby Keith’s I Love This Bar and Grill (“Toby Keith’s”).1

297 S.W.3d 137 (2009) Marvin HAYES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. No. ED 92359. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. November 10, 2009. Timothy. J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Terrence Michael Messonnier, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

949 N.E.2d 182 (2011) 409 Ill. App.3d 612 350 Ill. Dec. 694 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willie HAYES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-09-1466. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. April 19, 2011. Rehearing Denied May 13, 2011.