Cases

07/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 15, 2020 KENNETH C. MILLER v. MICHAEL KENNETH MILLER ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Carter County No. 30105 John C. Rambo, Chancellor No. E2019-01511-COA-R3-

NOONAN, Circuit Judge: Michael C. Miller entered a conditional plea of guilty to the crime of wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343. He reserved his right to appeal on the grounds that the count was time-barred and that evidence admitted under 18 U.S.C. § 3292, whose constitutionality he challenged, should be suppressed. The issues raise new points of law about parts of the Comprehensi

Scudder, Circuit Judge. Between 2012 and 2013, the Jerome Combs Detention Center in Kankakee, Illinois, prohibited inmates from receiving any newspapers. While awaiting trial on bank robbery charges, Joseph Miller's family bought him a $279 subscription to the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin to help him with his case. Deeming the Law Bulletin a newspap

TOOKEY, J. *108*817Respondent appeals a stalking protective order (SPO) that the trial court entered against him.1 On appeal, respondent contends, among other points, that (1) the trial court erred in "finding that objectively

OPINION Justice Goldberg, for the Court. This case came before the Supreme Court on April 6, 2017, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The plaintiff, Joanne C. Miller (plaintiff or Miller), appeals from a Superior Court judgment,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2018-CA-00445-COA SUSAN C. CUTRER, RICHARD MICHAEL APPELLANTS SAUCIER, BARBARA JAMES, SHERMAN MILLER, KAREN REEVES, AND MICHAEL REEVES v. SINGING RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/28/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES D. BELL COURT FROM WHICH APPE

04/04/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 16, 2019 Session BRUCE MILTON MILLER v. LUCINDA MILLER MILLER Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sullivan County No. 82CH1-2016-CV-18179 E.G. Moody, Chancellor No. E2018-01058-COA-R3-CV Bruce

POSNER, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, Michael Miller, a sergeant in the Detective Bureau of the St. Joseph County (Indiana) Police Department, where he had worked for more than thirty years, filed this suit against the County (which happens to be the county in which South Bend is located), the County Sheriff (Michael Grzegorek), who is in charge of the department and also the co

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (George F. Harkin, J.), dated February 18, 2016. The order, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s motion to amend a prior order of that court (Martha L. Luft, J.) dated April 1, 2015. Ordered that the order dated February 18, 2016, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In January 2015, the petitioner

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (George F. Harkin, J.), dated May 9, 2016. The order denied the petitioner’s motion for leave to reargue his prior motion to amend an order of that court (Martha L. Luft, J.) dated April 1, 2015. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The petitioner’s appeal from the order dated May

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. A growth was discovered on Venita Miller’s pancreas and she was told that cancer could not be ruled out without further testing. She told her supervisor, Linda Miller. (From here, we’ll use their first names to avoid confusion.) One week later, Linda fired Venita. Venita sued, claiming she was fired because Linda thought she had a disability. A jury disagreed. Venita asks this court to order a new tr

CUNNINGHAM, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} This appeal is taken from the order of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas awarding injunctive relief to plaintiff-appellee Albert W. Vontz III in an action involving a dispute among the shareholders of nominal defendant Dayton Heidelberg Distributing Co., an Ohio family-owned-and-operated close corporation ("Heidelberg"), Heidelberg's six-membe

RICHARD Y. ATLEE, JR., Judge. Appellant Michael Hugh Palmer Murphy (“father”) and appellee Corie Ann Murphy (“mother”) divorced in 2013. The Circuit Court of Prince William County (“the trial court”) modified their custody, visitation, and child support agreement in November 2014, reducing mother’s support obligation to reflect a reduction in annual salary from $170,000 to $108,

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:A petition for certification of the judgment in A-000459-15 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted; and it is furtherORDERED that the appellant may serve and file a supplemental brief on or before August 13, 2018, and respondent may serve and file a supplemental brief fort

NUMBER 13-11-00149-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ BRUCE MILLER, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CLR GROUP, LLC, ET AL., APPELLEES. ____________________________________________________________

To the Appellate Division, Superior Court:A cross-petition for certification of the judgment in A-000459-15 having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same;It is ORDERED that the cross-petition for certification is denied.

UNITED STATES, Appellant v. Michael C. MILLER, Senior Airman U.S. Air Force, Appellee No. 07-5004 CCA Misc. Dkt. No. 2007-02 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued January 7, 2008 Decided May 20, 2008 STUCKY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in

Appellate review denied.

In re Nancy Miller; Zachary Miller;— Plaintiff(s); Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 123083; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2014 CA 1701. Denied.

ORDER PER CURIAM. Carol Miller (“Miller”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her medical negligence action against Defendants Michael Awad, M.D., PhD and Barnes Jewish Hospital. The trial court dismissed Miller’s action without prejudice on the grounds that she failed to file a health care affidavit within 90 days or 180 days of filing her petition as required by section 538.225.5 RSMo (Cu