Cases

OPINION KEVIN McNULTY, District Judge: This matter comes to the Court on Defendants’ motions (Docket Nos. 37 and 38), *314pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 12(b)(6), to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint (“FAC,” Docket No. 29) in this putative class action. For the reasons set forth below, the motions to dismiss will be granted in part and den

927 F.Supp. 1092 (1996) Emil G. WISCH, Plaintiff, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 94 C 7430. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 6, 1996. *1093 William T. Coleman, Law Offices of William T. Coleman, Chicago, Illinois, for Plaintiff Emil G. Wisch. David J. Parsons, Frederick L. Schwa

914 P.2d 102 (1996) 81 Wash.App. 163 Joe M. WLASIUK, Respondent, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Appellant. and Louis Fred Huggins, Jr. and Jane Doe Huggins, a marital community, Defendants. No. 33651-7-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. March 11, 1996. Publication Ordered April 15, 1996.

197 Wis.2d 144 (1995) 539 N.W.2d 883 WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Sharon ZIEBERT, Defendant-Petitioner,[†] ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jaclyn ZIEBERT, Third Party Defendant-Intervenor-Respondent, Kenneth ZIEBERT, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Blain Supply, Inc.

Ellington, J. Joe Wlasiuk began working for Whirlpool Corporation in 1976. In 1989, he was fired for insubordination. Wlasiuk sued for wrongful discharge based on the company’s employee handbook; the jury returned a verdict in his favor. Whirlpool filed this appeal, and Wlasiuk cross-appealed. We affirm. *167I TIMELINESS OF APPEAL

875 N.E.2d 751 (2007) WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Appellant-Petitioner, v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY-CITY OF EVANSVILLE HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION and Harriett Layne, Appellees-Respondents. No. 82A04-0703-CV-165. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 5, 2007. *753 Todd M. Nierman, Dustin D. Stohler, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

76 Wn. App. 250 (1994) 884 P.2d 13 JOE M. WLASIUK, Respondent, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, ET AL, Appellants. No. 33651-7-I. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. November 28, 1994. *251 Stephen Michael Rummage and Davis Wright Tremaine (David J. Parsons and Harrold Allen

873 F.Supp. 111 (1995) WHIRLPOOL FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GN HOLDINGS, INC., etc., et al., Defendants. No. 94 C 4192. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 6, 1995. *112 *113 *114 Roy M. Van Cleave, Jonathan G. B

24 B.R. 676 (1982) In re PLAD, INC., Debtor. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, and First American Bank of Nashville, N.A., Intervening Plaintiff, v. PLAD, INC., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 382-01282, Adv. No. 382-0273. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee. October 27, 1982. *677 Larry Stewart, Nashvil

SERCOMBE, J. In this workers’ compensation case, SAIF Corporation (SAIF) and employer Quantum Resource Recovery (Quantum) seek judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board), which determined that the worsening of claimant’s preexisting L4-5 disc herniation was a “consequential condition” under ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A) because a compensable injury to claimant’s left foot was “the major contributing cause” o

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the SOUTHPEAK DEFENDANTS’ MOTION *667FOR REMITTITUR, A NEW TRIAL, AND/OR TO AMEND THE JUDGMENT UNDER RULES 59 AND 60 (Docket No. 150). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. PROCEDURAL BAC

425 F.Supp.2d 1056 (2006) SHARPER IMAGE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, Ionic Pro, LLC, a Delaware corporation, Ideal Products, LLC, a Nevis (offshore) corporation, Sylmark, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Sylmark, LLC, a Delaware corporation, Qwik Cook, Inc. d/b/a Home Trends, a New York corporation, Factories2U, LLC, a California corporation, and Chaim Mark Bess, an individual, Defen

(2008) Harry OESTREICHER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ALIENWARE CORPORATION, and Does 1-100, inclusive, Defendants. No. C 07-00512 MHP. United States District Court, N.D. California. April 1, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judg

721 F.Supp.2d 1218 (2010) Ellen T. HAYNES, Plaintiff, v. WILDER CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, Defendant. Case No.: 8:09-cv-430-T-23AEP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. June 22, 2010. *1220 Gregory Sagor Grossman, Bay Area Legal Services, Inc., Wimauma, FL, for Plaintiff. Laura H. Howard, Michael C. A

751 N.E.2d 27 (2001) 322 Ill. App.3d 805 255 Ill.Dec. 933 Irene HERNANDEZ, as Temporary Guardian of the Estate and Person of Michael A. Hernandez, a Disabled Person, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KARLIN FOODS CORPORATION, a Corporation, and Vern E. Lundberg, Inc., a Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-00-2379. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, S

129 Cal.Rptr.2d 682 (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 749 ROBINSON HELICOPTER COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DANA CORPORATION, Defendant and Appellant. No. B150963. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three. January 24, 2003. Rehearing Denied February 21, 2003. Review Granted May 14, 2003.

754 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2010) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNITENDED ACCELERATION MAKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGTION. This document relates to: All economic loss cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 30, 2010. *1151 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton B. Fisher, Jayne

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALLEN SHARP, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendant Jewel Food Stores, Inc.’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Second Claim for Relief. The Court has considered all relevant materials submitted by the parties and now rules as follows. JURISDICTION This cause of action arises

916 F.Supp. 322 (1996) HERBKO INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. GEMMY INDUSTRIES CORP., Defendant. No. 95 Civ. 9848 (SHS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 26, 1996. *323 *324 Michael Aschen, Abelman Frayne & Schwab, New York City, for plaintiff. Gerard F. Dunn

51 F.Supp.2d 936 (1999) The WASTE, INC. COST RECOVERY GROUP et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALLIS CHALMERS CORP. et al., Defendants. The Waste, Inc. Cost Recovery Group et al., Plaintiffs, v. Allis Chalmers Corp. et al., Defendants. Nos. 3:98 CV 0341 AS, 3:98 CV 0342 AS. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. April 9, 1999.