Cases

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OTHER MOTIONS AND ORDER ' TO SHOW CAUSE ROBERT J. BRYAN, United States District Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 58) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 68), Plaintiffs’ two Motion to Strike (Dkts. 68 (refiled at 86 and 87); and 97) and Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Exclude Gr

Opinion RUBIN, Acting P. J. The City of West Covina and West Covina Police Officer Enrique Macias appeal from the judgment entered after a jury found that Macias caused the wrongful death of David Mendoza through the unconstitutional use of excessive force while Mendoza was in custody at a hospital. We reject appellants’ contentions that Macias was entitled to qualified immunity for his conduct; the jury’s ver

Filed 9/15/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE CARLOS MENDOZA, Petitioner, A173171 v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE (San Francisco City & County CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Super. Ct. No. 24020828) FRANCISCO, Respondent; THE PEOPLE,

Case: 22-20436 Document: 00516914650 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/29/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

JUN 21 1013 t''.' ,# '" . :.:.".­ COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION III, STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF YAKIMA, ) No. 30666-6-111 )

Filed 2/3/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT THE PEOPLE, B306169 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA119397) v. RICHARD BERT MENDOZA, JR., Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los An

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 24-1112, 24-1260 JOSE RENE ALVAREZ MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF ORDERS OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

Reena Raggi, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Moshe Marcel Ajdler sued defendant the Argentine Province of Mendoza ("Mendoza") in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Victor Marrero, Judge ) for failing to pay principal and interest on certain of its bonds. Ajdler now appeals from the dismissal of his claims as untimely. See

Filed 5/3/23 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GUADALUPE MENDOZA, F084354 Petitioner, v. (Super. Ct. No. BF170463A) THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KERN COUNTY,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 22-1811 Filed September 27, 2023 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JUAN JOSE MENDOZA JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Michael Motto, District Associate Judge. Juan Mendoza Jr. appeals his conviction for assault causing bodily injury

HERNANDEZ, District Judge: *1150Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and a putative class, challenging Oregon's practice of suspending an individual's driver's license for failure to pay "traffic debt."1 More specifically, the six named Plaintiffs, each of whom lives on an extremely limited income

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2021 WY 127 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2021 November 17, 2021 JORGE OMERO MENDOZA, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-21-0060 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal from the District Court

Filed 2/4/22; certified for publication 3/1/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOSE MARIO MENDOZA, H044372 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 1-15 CV281073) v. TRANS VALLEY TRANSPORT et al

RUSHING, P.J. PREMO, J.

Filed 4/20/17 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, H039705 (Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. Nos. 212506, C1114503) v. ORDER

OPINION OF THE COURT Mark Dwyer, J. Defendant Mendoza moves to suppress property seized at or near the time of his arrest. He moves as well to suppress a statement he made at a precinct after the arrest, and a lineup identification also obtained at the precinct. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. A At a suppression hearing

Werdegar, J. *1077 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has asked this court to resolve unsettled questions concerning the construction of the state's day *1078 of rest statutes, Labor

Opinion McKINSTER, J. Defendant and appellant Kimberly Mendoza admitted alleged violations of probation and the trial court continued her on probation. Defendant appealed, requesting a certificate of probable cause to challenge the validity of the plea/admission and continuation on probation. Defendant contends that the trial court failed to act on a demand fo

This opinion was fiied for record riTE OMK onOt|-.12,20n IN CLERKS OFFICE WFRaE COURT,81RIE OF mSHR^QTON DATE QCT I 2 2517 SUSAN L CARLSON ^ClAAl/UA4Slir , C/ SUPREME COURT CLERK CHIEF JUSTICE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON S

Worswick, J. ¶39 (dissenting) — I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion that the district court abused its discretion when it denied Ascension Salgado-Mendoza’s CrRLJ 8.3(b) motion to exclude state toxicologist testimony. The majority holds that the prosecutor committed governmental mismanagement by failing to subpoena a specific toxicologist to testify at trial or to take reasonable steps to ensure the timely