Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MELVIN F. LUSTER”
In Re Lusterpublic domain
134 B.R. 632 (1991) In re Melvin L. LUSTER and Harold E. Friedman, Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 78 B 9574, 78 B 9575. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. November 21, 1991. *633 Dennis E. Quaid, trustee. Maynard Russell, Michael L. Stone, Fagel, Haber & Maragos, Chicago, Ill., for trustee. R. Villageliu, Off
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. This case of first and last impression presents the question whether net operating loss carryforwards are “property” of the debtor’s estate under the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, a statute repealed 14 years ago. Section 346(i)(l) of the Bankruptcy Code of 1978, 11 U.S.C. § 346(i)(1), provides that the estate succeeds to all tax attributes of the debtor. Se
Lyons v. Lusterpublic domain
359 P.2d 567 (1960) Mack LYONS, Allie Lyons Anthony, Elby Lyons and James A. Franklin, Executor of the Estate of Viola Lyons Franklin, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Melvin F. LUSTER, Individually, and as Executor of the Estate of Mary J. Lyons, Deceased, Odessa Littlejohn, Mrs. Laura Hunter and Love Mae Gibson, Defendants in Error. No. 38467. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. November 29, 1
138 B.R. 875 (1992) In re Melvin R. LUSTER, Debtor. UNITED STATES of America, for the use of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Appellant-Cross Appellee, v. Dennis E. QUAID, not individually, but as Trustee for the Estate of Melvin R. Luster, Appellee-Cross Appellant. Bankruptcy Nos. 92 C 225, 78 B 9574. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. April 2, 1992. <
Luster v. Jonespublic domain
70 Ill. App.3d 1019 (1979) 388 N.E.2d 1029 MELVIN R. LUSTER et al., Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. R. ALDEN JONES, Defendant and Counterplaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. No. 77-82. Illinois Appellate Court First District (5th Division). Opinion filed April 6, 1979. *1020
United States v. Melvin C. Crosspublic domain
PER CURIAM. Defendant, Melvin C. Cross, appeals his conviction and sentence for distribution of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school. For the following reasons, we affirm. I. On January 25, 1989, a federal grand jury for the Western District of Michigan returned an indictment charging Cross and co-defendant Gina D. Mancha with one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §
People v. Lusterpublic domain
44 Mich. App. 38 (1972) 205 N.W.2d 78 PEOPLE v. LUSTER. Docket No. 11459. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided December 6, 1972. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Gerard A. Po
Lake Shore National Bank v. Coylepublic domain
296 F.Supp. 412 (1968) LAKE SHORE NATIONAL BANK and Melvin R. Luster, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Arthur M. Luster, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. E. C. COYLE, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue, Defendant. Civ. No. 66-C-1002. United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D. June 27, 1968. *413
Lake Shore National Bank v. Coylepublic domain
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns a suit for refund of alleged overpayments of estate taxes instituted by plaintiffs, Lake Shore National Bank and Melvin R. Luster, as executors of the estate of Arthur M. Luster, deceased. The district court was presented with two issues on cross-motions for summary judgment. They were: (1) whether the estate was entitled to a marital deduction in the amount of $200,000; and (2) w
Young v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.public domain
601 F.Supp. 399 (1984) Leslie YOUNG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. A.C. YOUNG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Ray OTT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Defendants. Melvin WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FORTY-EIGHT INSULATIONS, INC. et al., Defendants. George R. ODER, et al., Plainti
Dishmon v. Statepublic domain
248 S.W.3d 656 (2008) Melvin Charles DISHMON, Movant-Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent. No. 28361. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. March 27, 2008. *657 Gwenda R. Robinson, District Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., and Shaun J. MacK
Lake Shore National Bank v. Coylepublic domain
419 F.2d 958 LAKE SHORE NATIONAL BANK and Melvin R. Luster, as Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Arthur M. Luster, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.E. C. COYLE, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue, Defendant-Appellee. No. 17464. United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit. December 30, 1969. J
Commonwealth v. Schleypublic domain
OPINION BY MUSMANNO, J.: Susan Schley (“Schley”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following her conviction of endangering the welfare of children (“EWOC”). 1 We vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for further proceedings. Schley and her husband, Charles Sc
Nickless v. Aaronson (In re Katz)public domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS I THROUGH VII OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION JOEL B. ROSENTHAL, Bankruptcy Judge. Before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Counts I through VII of the Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [# 34] and the Trustee’s Opposition thereto [# 39]. The Motion to Dismiss seeks a dismiss
Dushon Hampton v. United Statespublic domain
*697 SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Petitioner, Dushon Hampton, appeals judgment denying Ms motion to vacate sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the following reasons, we VACATE and REMAND for further proceedings. I. On October 17, 1994, a grand j
MacEo Waites v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-09-00096-CR ______________________________ MACEO WAITES, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 115th Judicial District Court Marion County, Texas Trial Court No. F10734-A Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Mose
MacEo Waites v. Statepublic domain
<
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SHADUR, District Judge. Both the United States and Trustee Dennis Quaid (“Trustee”) for the bankruptcy estate (the “Estate”) of Harold Friedman (“Friedman”) have appealed from the decision of Bankruptcy Judge Eugene Wedoff reported as In re Luster, 134 B.R. 632 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1991).1 For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and or
Bellows v. Amoco Oil Co, TXpublic domain
*270 GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Martin J. Bellow 1 (Bellow) and Phillips Industrial Constructors, Inc. (PICI), a Texas corporation, brought this lawsuit against defendant Amoco Oil Company, Texas City refinery (Amoco), alleging that Amoco
899 F.2d 271 16 Fed.R.Serv.3d 111, 17 Media L. Rep. 1537 Melvin D. REUBER, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.FOOD CHEMICAL NEWS, INC.; Defendant-Appellant,andLitton Industries, Inc.; Litton Bionetics, Inc.; VincentT. Devita, Jr., National Cancer Institute, NationalInstitute of Health; Richard Adamson, National CancerInstitute, National Institute of Health; William V.Hartwell, National Cancer Inst