⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “MCO INDUSTRIES INC”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 3405
Greblewski v Strong Health MCO, LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 03405) Greblewski v Strong Health MCO, LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 03405 Decided on May 10, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reportin
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1995-02-13 · Published · cited 40× · 659 A.2d 760; 1995 WL 309831
659 A.2d 760 (1995) In re MAXXAM, INC./Federated Development Shareholders Litigation. NL INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MAXXAM, INC., a Delaware corporation, MCO Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Federated Development Co., a New York business trust, Charles E. Hurwitz., Barry Munitz, Ezra G. Levin, John M. Seidl, William C. Leone, and Stanley D. Rosenberg, Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 12111, 12353.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1996-09-10 · Published · cited 16× · 698 A.2d 949; 1996 Del. Ch. LEXIS 114
698 A.2d 949 (1996) In Re MAXXAM, INC./FEDERATED DEVELOPMENT SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION. NL INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MAXXAM, INC., a Delaware corporation, MCO Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Federated Development Co., a New York business trust, Charles E. Hurwitz, Barry Munitz, Ezra G. Levin, John M. Seidl, William C. Leone, and Stanley D. Rosenberg, Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 12111, 12353.
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985-09-30 · Published · cited 5× · 107 F.R.D. 703; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15472
OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT COHN, District Judge. I. A. Before me for approval is a proposed consent judgment resolving this class action for injunctive and other relief arising out of the May, 1981 riots and post-riots lockdown at the State Prison of Southern Michigan at Jackson (SPSM). On April 11, 1985, I certified a class of between 6,0
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 925 N.W.2d 262
JOHNSON, Judge (dissenting) Under well-established caselaw, a municipal ordinance conflicts with, and thus is preempted by, a state statute if "the ordinance forbids what the statute expressly permits." Mangold Midwest Co. v. Village of Richfield , 274 Minn. 347,
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2025-02-26 · Published · cited 0×
02/26/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 7, 2023 Session THE CHATTANOOGA-HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY D/B/A ERLANGER HEALTH SYSTEM v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE PLAN OF THE RIVER VALLEY, INC. D/B/A AMERICHOICE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 09-1253-
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019-05-06 · Published · cited 2× · 2019 Ohio 1691; 130 N.E.3d 327
CARR, Judge. {¶1} Plaintiff-Appellant Automation Tool & Die, Inc. ("ATD") appeals from the judgment of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas. This Court affirms. I. {¶2} ATD is an employer participating in the State Insurance Fund under the Ohio Workers' Compensation System. In 2008, one of ATD's employees filed a First Report of Injury
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-05-26 · Published · cited 12× · 194 So. 3d 784; 2016 WL 3031720; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1046; 2016 La.App. 1 Cir. 0585
McDonald, j. lain this appeal, UnitedHealthcare. of Louisiana, Inc. challenges a judgment denying its exceptions of no cause of action and no right of action as to the antitrust claims asserted by plaintiff,' HPC Biologi-cals, Inc. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The facts, as alleged
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2021-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed November 2, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-01583-CV DALLAS MEDICAL CENTER, LLC D/B/A DALLAS MEDICAL CENTER, PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES–MESQUITE, LLC D/B/A DALLAS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, AND KNAPP MEDICAL CENTER, Appellants V. MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF TEXAS,
United States District Court · 2018-07-12 · Published · cited 3× · 319 F. Supp. 3d 587
GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge This case involves the removal of a state court complaint and a subsequent motion to remand. (Docket Nos. 1; 13). Mennonite General Hospital, Inc. ("Plaintiff") sued Molina Healthcare of Puerto Rico, Inc. ("Molina"), MMM Healthcare, LLC ("MMM"), and MSO of Puerto Rico, Inc. ("MSO") (collectively "Defendants") in Puerto Rico state court, requesting injunctive and monetary relief for the
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 428 F.2d 775; 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2664; 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8414
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. The employer, now operating as Brooks Research and Manufacturing, Inc., a subsidiary of Xebec Corporation, admits refusing to recognize or bargain with the Union (U.A.W., AFL-CIO, Local 710). The Board determined that the employer had violated § 8(a) (5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (5) (1)) by this recalcitrance. The employer seeks to justify its action on the basis
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008-11-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2008 Ohio 6083
DECISION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Relator, Dale Carlson ("relator"), filed this action seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent, the Industrial Commission of Ohio ("respondent" or "the commission"), to vacate its order denying relator's motion seeking an award of temporary total disability ("TTD") compensation effective September 5, 2006, and to enter an order granting TTD compensation.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2023-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 21, 2023. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00674-CV WEST HOUSTON LUXURY IMPORTS, INC. D/B/A JAGUAR LAND ROVER WEST HOUSTON, Appellant V. JUSTIN LEIGHTON AND LINZI LEIGHTON, Appellees On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harri
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-11-10 · Published · cited 0× · 2016 Ohio 7705
[Cite as State ex rel. Bergen v. Northgate Masonry, Inc., 2016-Ohio-7705.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Mark Bergen, : Relator, : v. : No. 15AP-923 Northgate Masonry, Inc. and : (REGULAR C
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 462 S.W.3d 723; 2015 WL 2266946
OPINION MAZE, JUDGE: Kentucky Spirit Health Plan, Inc., (hereinafter “Kentucky Spirit”) appeals from a decision of the Franklin Circuit Court granting summary judgment in favor of *726the numerous appellees in this case (collectively “the Commonwealth”). Specifically, Kentucky Spirit argues that the circuit court erroneously interpreted
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008-05-08 · Published · cited 0× · 2008 Ohio 2296
DECISION {¶ 1} Relator, Deerfield Manufacturing, Inc. ("relator"), commenced this original action requesting this court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering respondent Industrial Commission of Ohio ("commission") to vacate its award of permanent total disability *Page 2 ("PTD") compensation to respondent Anderson B. Taylor ("claimant") and to enter an order denying said compensation.</
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970-06-30 · Published · cited 18× · 428 F.2d 775
428 F.2d 775 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2664, 63 Lab.Cas. P 10,995 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,v.DIT-MCO INCORPORATED, Xebec Corporation, Xebec CorporationDIT-MCO Electronics Division, Brooks Research, Inc., aSubsidiary of Xebec Corporation, Brooks Research andManufacturing Company, a Subsidiary of Xebec Corporation, Respondents. No. 19794. Un
District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008-06-17 · Published · cited 17× · 562 F. Supp. 2d 1056; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54964; 2008 WL 2444689
(2008) Gladys MENSING, Plaintiff, v. WYETH, INC. (d/b/a Wyeth); Schwarz Pharma, Inc.; Pliva, Inc.; Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc.; Alpharma, Inc., d/b/a Alpharma Pharmaceuticals; UDL Laboratories, Inc.; Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, and Purepac Pharmaceutical Co.; and the following fictitious party defendants (whether singular or plural, individual or corporate): No. 1, that entity which originally obtained permission from the U.S. Food and Drug Admin
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-03-03 · Published · cited 0×
03/03/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 10, 2020 Session DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION, DIVISION OF TENNCARE v. THE CHATTANOOGA-HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY D/B/A ERLANGER HEALTH SYSTEM Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 19-119
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2014-11-18 · Published · cited 1× · 69 F. Supp. 3d 915; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162309; 2014 WL 6473241
DECISION AND ORDER RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge. This negligence action against Defendant United States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA” or the “Act”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., arises from a five-day fire at Plaintiff Patrick Cudahy, Incorporated (“Patrick Cudahy”) in Cudahy, Wisconsin. The fire was ignited by a military flare stolen from a California military base.