Cases

SWYGERT, Senior Circuit Judge: Jacklyn McKenna appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), 1 — F.Supp. -. We affirm the dismissal because, as the district court held, the WMATA Compact, D.C. Code Ann. § 1-2431, exempts WMA-TA from the Federal

670 F.Supp. 7 (1986) Jacklyn M. McKENNA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 85-1513. United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 30, 1986. *8 Marylin Jenkins White Koonz, McKenney & Johnson, P.C., Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs. Sara E. Lister, W

MEMORANDUM OPINION Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David V. Mann filed this lawsuit against his former employer, Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), alleging that he was unlawfully terminated on the basis of race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDREA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-950 (JEB) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Andrea Johnso

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge Plaintiff Andrea Johnson is a former employee of Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, which, she charitably alleges, operates the "always dependable transit service in the Washington metropolitan area." Amend. Compl., ¶ 4. Her suit, however, does not depend on the punctuality of Metro; it instead alleges that WMATA unlawfully discriminated against her on the basis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 20-3157 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 4 : WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA : TRANSIT AUTHORITY, :

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Plaintiff Patrick Russell, a participant in the Harman Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) established by Harman International Industries, Incorporated (“Harman”), brings on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated this putative class action against Harman, Dr. Sidney H

510 F.Supp.2d 106 (2007) Madeline RIGGILADEZ, Plaintiff, v. Hon. Francis J. HARVEY, Secretary of the Army, Defendant. Civil No. 06cv1337 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 24, 2007. *107 *108 Jason H. Ehrenberg, Bailey & Ehrenberg PLLC, Washington, DC, for

892 F.Supp. 5 (1995) Soon PARK, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 92-50 SSH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 6, 1995. *6 *7 Joel P. Bennett, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Bruce P. Heppen, WMATA, Washington, DC,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Plaintiff, v. 6,627 SQUARE FEET OF LAND, MORE OR Civil Action Nos. 21-1753 and 21-1757 LESS, SITUATE IN THE DISTRICT OF (BAH) COLUMBIA (KNOWN AS 2506 28TH STREET NE), et al.,

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the plaintiffs motion for sanctions. The

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CECILY M. MORGAN, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 15-0401 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 8 : WA

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Muhammed Gibbs, Elmer Crisco and Emiliano Crisostomo (“Plaintiffs”) have filed suit against the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA” or “Defendant”) alleging discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Presen

238 F.Supp.2d 160 (2002) Christine POWELL, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 00-0084(PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 9, 2002. *161 Gary Thomas Brown, Brown & Sherman, LL, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Robert John Kniaz, Washington Met

946 F.Supp. 1023 (1996) Judy J. JONES, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 89-0552(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 15, 1996. *1024 Richard A. Salzman, Kator, Scott & Heller, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Robert John Kniaz, Frederic

391 F.Supp.2d 140 (2005) Harvey L. PATTERSON, Plaintiff, v. Stephen L. JOHNSON, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant. No. CIV.A.02-2213 ESH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 26, 2005. *141 *142 David H. Shapiro, Swick & Shapiro, P.C., Washi

946 F.Supp. 1011 (1996) Judy J. JONES, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 89-0552 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 15, 1996. *1012 *1013 *1014 Richard A. Salzman, Kator

MEMORANDUM OPINION Denying Defendants’ Motion to Tkansfer Venue and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION In 2009, a consortium of four cellular telephone carriers (collectively “Defendants” or the “Carrier Consor

339 F.Supp.2d 97 (2004) Robert BURTON, Plaintiff, v. Robert BATISTA, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, and Arthur F. Rosenfield, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 03-1784(JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 12, 2004. *98 *99<

391 F.Supp.2d 30 (2005) Shawn KEELEY, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence M. SMALL, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, Defendant. No. CIV.A.01-0725 JDB. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 30, 2005. *31 *32 *33 *34</