Cases

SCHAFER, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} Appellant, Matthew McCullough, appeals the judgment entry of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to dismiss the indictment. This Court affirms. I. {¶ 2} On March 27, 2017, McCullough was indicted for causing serious harm to a companion animal, on or about February 14, 2017, in violation of

609 S.E.2d 249 (2005) Shimisha HOWIE, Plaintiff, v. John T. WALSH, D.D.S., Defendant. No. COA04-155. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 1, 2005. Gittleman, Paskel, Tashman & Walker, P.C., by Justin Haas, Southfield, for plaintiff. Carruthers & Roth, P.A., by Kenneth L. Jones, and Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge, & Rice, P.L.L.C., by James Cooney

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department of Transportation, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 246 C.D. 2016 : Argued: September 15, 2016 Walsh/Granite JV, : Respondent : BEFORE: HONO

Defendant-appellant, Roy McCullough, appeals a decision of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, increasing the amount of his child support obligation and ordering him to maintain a trust fund for his minor child's future college education. Appellant and plaintiff-appellee, Victoria McCullough, were divorced on July 20, 1983. Custody of the parties' minor child, Tabitha McCullough, was awarded to appellee, and appellant was ordered to pay child support i

OPINION BY Judge BROBSON. Before the Court are eleven (11) consolidated petitions for review, filed by Petitioners 1 — nine physicians, represented in this matter by their billing and collection companies, East Coast TMR and WJO Inc., (hereafter collectively referred to as Providers or East Coast TMR). Providers, who provided medical treatment to eleven workers’ compensation claiman

169 Cal.App.4th 1049 (2008) BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PETALUMA et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. JAMES J. WALSH, as Cotrustee, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. A120285. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five. December 31, 2008. *1051 Wigdahl & Passarino, Gary J. Passarino; Cooper, White &a;

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 127,008 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. VERLEE MCCULLOUGH III, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When considering a defendant's motion to suppress, an app

Per Curiam. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (M. Walsh, J.), entered August 13, 2012, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody and visitation. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of two sons (born in 1996 and 1999). In July 2010, Family Court en

Per Curiam. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Albany County (M. Walsh, J.), entered August 13, 2012, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, to modify a prior order of custody and visitation. Petitioner (hereinafter the father) and respondent (hereinafter the mother) are the parents of two sons (born in 1996 and 1999). In July 2010, Family Court en

State of Vermont Superior Court—Environmental Division ======================================================================== ENTRY REGARDING MOTIONS ======================================================================== In re McCullough Crushing Inc., Amended CU Docket No. 179-10-10 Vtec Title: Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 7) Filed: June 5, 2013 Filed By: Appellant McCul

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION McCullough Crushing Inc. Amended CU Docket No. 179-10-10 Vtec McCullough Crushing Inc. Act 250 Exp. Docket No. 3-1-10 Vtec Decision on the Merits In the pending coordinated matters, Applicant McCullough Crushing, Inc. (MCI or

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION McCullough Crushing, Inc. A250 Expansion Docket No. 3-1-10 Vtec McCullough Crushing, Inc. Amended CU Docket No. 179-10-10 Vtec Decision on Motions to Alter/Amend McCullough Crushing, Inc. (MCI) seeks an Act 250 land use permit amendment and municipal conditional use approval for the expans

03/31/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 29, 2019 at Knoxville MICHAEL SHANE MCCULLOUGH v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Obion County No. 17-CR-139 Jeffery W. Parham, Judge No. W2019-00629-CCA-R3-P

Joseph F. Bianco, District Judge: Plaintiffs Thomas A. Datre Sr. ("Mr. Datre"), Clara Datre ("Mrs. Datre" and, together with Mr. Datre, the "Datres"), and Daytree at Cortland Square, Inc. ("Daytree" and, collectively, "plaintiffs") bring this action against defendants Michael P. Walsh, Edward Walsh,1 Michael Torres, Robert L. Cicale, and Anthony S. Senft, Jr.; councilmembers of the Town of Islip (the "

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Aug 16 2016, 9:25 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing Court of Appeals

—Appeal from an order of Onondaga County Court (Walsh, J.), dated March 8, 2001, which affirmed a judgment (denominated order) of Syracuse City Court dated February 8, 2000. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Onondaga County Court, Walsh, J. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Dennis J. Walsh appeals from the district court’s May 5, 2008, 2008 WL 1991118, judgment granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Walsh’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts of the case and the issues on appeal. “We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment.” Coa

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Dennis J. Walsh appeals from the district court’s May 5, 2008, 2008 WL 1991118, judgment granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing Walsh’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts of the case and the issues on appeal. “We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment.” Coa

279 F.Supp.2d 1005 (2003) CENTRAL STATES INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY, INC., and CPI Sales, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Steve McCULLOUGH, Defendant. No. C02-0052-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. September 3, 2003. *1006 *1007 *1008

OPINION {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Matthew McCullough, appeals his conviction and sentence in the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas on three counts of aggravated murder and one count each of murder, aggravated robbery, kidnapping, and attempted rape for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for 58 years. {¶ 2} On the evening of June 28-29, 20