Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge On May 29, 2009, plaintiff Linda A. McCauley was terminated from her position as an Administrative Services Specialist at the U.S. Department of Interior’s Division of Administration, Office of Surface Mining. EEOC Decision No. 0320110042, 1-2 [Dkt. # 1] (“EEOC Decision”). Plain

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated January 14, 2004, as, upon renewal, granted the motion of the defendant Esta A. Goldman, and the separate motion of the defendants Melvin Brill and Leonard Brill, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them

EDDIE A. SALAZAR, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. SD34123 ) Filed: September 15, 2016 STATE OF MISSOURI, )

415 F.3d 436 Laura Estela SALAZAR-REGINO, Petitioner-Appellant,v.E.M. TROMINSKI, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees.Teodulo Cantu-Delgadillo, Petitioner-Appellant,v.E.M. Trominski, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents-Appellees.

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The petitioners are lawful permanent resident aliens who pleaded guilty to marihuana possession offenses and received deferred adjudication in state court. Based on their guilty pleas, the government successfully sought their removal from the United States. Although at the time of their guilty pleas the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) interpreted the relevant immigration statutes as not re

*666In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Mansooh Alam appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Burke, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated May 18, 2012, which, after a hearing, and upon a finding that he had committed a family offense, directed him, inter alia, to stay away from Nurussabah Alam until and including May 18, 2014.

*666In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Mansooh Alam appeals from an order of protection of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Burke, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated May 18, 2012, which, after a hearing, and upon a finding that he had committed a family offense, directed him, inter alia, to stay away from Nurussabah Alam until and including May 18, 2014.

In two related family offense proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Cesar Alfonso Saldivar appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Lebwohl, J.), dated March 20, 2012, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition, and (2) an order of protection of the same court dated March 30, 2012, which, after a hearing, and upon a finding that he committed the family offenses of disorderly conduct and harassment in the second degre

In two related family offense proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, Cesar Alfonso Saldivar appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Lebwohl, J.), dated March 20, 2012, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition, and (2) an order of protection of the same court dated March 30, 2012, which, after a hearing, and upon a finding that he committed the family offenses of disorderly conduct and harassment in the second degre

12/21/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 5, 2021 NICOLE MARIE NEUMAN v. PAUL PHILLIPS Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 20CV-49481 Deanna B. Johnson, Judge ___________________________________

OPINION COLE, Chief Judge. The United States appeals the district court’s order suppressing a firearm found in defendant Samuel Johnson’s car during a traffic stop. The district court ruled that because the police had unconstitutionally seized Johnson before he rolled through a stop sign, this'traffic violation could not justify the stop. Considering all the facts and circumstances, we conclude

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge Defendants, two Lower Brule Sioux Tribal Council members (tribal Defendants) and three United States government officials (government Defendants) (all Defendants collectively, “Defendants”), filed motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to Rule of Civil Pro

Ripple, Circuit Judge. In 2012, Chicago Police Department officers arrested Daniel Martinez during a search of his home. They charged him with resisting arrest and obstruction of justice, but a jury acquitted him. He subsequently brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Virginia M. Kendall, U.S. District Court Judge . On November 15 2015, Plaintiff Shawn Townsel initiated this Bivens action against Defendants, U.S. Postal Service employee Ellen Spaulding and Postal Inspectors Jason Jamerson and Mark Mas-kas,1 for violations of Plaintiffs Fourth Amendment rights. Townsel alleges that the Defendants used ex

ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFFS’ TORT CLAIMS ACT CLAIMS AGAINST THE COUNTY DEFENDANTS William P. Lynch, United States Magistrate Judge This lawsuit is based upon the accidental shooting of Robert Dominguez, the father of Plaintiffs, by Officer Charles Laramie of the Santa Fe Police Department in the early morning hours of March 4, 2013. In their Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs have s

Memorandum opinion and ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS Kane, Senior United States District Judge Introduction Exasperated with the Greeley Tribune’s repeated littering of his yard despite his *1290numerous complaints, Plaintiff Lawrence Derosier called the paper and suggested that he would “take a shot at” the next delivery pers

946 S.W.2d 504 (1997) Bishop Rene H. GRACIDA, Relator, v. The Honorable Hilda TAGLE, Judge, 148th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas, Respondent. No. 13-97-081-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. May 8, 1997. *505 Michael J. Sullivan, Porter, Rogers, Dahlman & Gordon, Corpus Christi, for relator. <

MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Pro se Plaintiff Charles Neuman (“Plaintiff’ or “Neuman”) has brought the instant action against the United States, the Department of Justice, and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (collectively “Defendants”) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. §

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1888 DANIEL MARTINEZ, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. _________

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1888 DANIEL MARTINEZ, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. _________