⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “MCCANTS v. THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION”

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017-04-26 · Published · cited 1× · 251 F. Supp. 3d 952; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64887
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge. Plaintiffs, Rashanda McCants and Devon Ramsay, brought this putative class action in state court against Defendants, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (the “NCAA”) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (“UNC-Chapel Hill”), alleging various state claims against each Defendant, The NCAA removed the case to this Court pursuant
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016-08-12 · Published · cited 2× · 201 F. Supp. 3d 732; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106873; 2016 WL 4272362
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge Plaintiffs, Rashanda McCants (“McCants”) and Devon Ramsay (“Ramsay”), brought this putative class action in state court against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (the “NCAA”) and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (“UNC-Chapel Hill”), alleging various state claims against each Defendant. The NCAA removed the case to this
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019-03-27 · Published · cited 14× · 381 F. Supp. 3d 573
OSTEEN, JR., District Judge Presently before this court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint filed by Defendant United States of America (the "Government"). (Doc. 40.) The Government has filed a brief in support of its motion. (Doc. 41.) Plaintiffs Lynn Doe, Ann Doe, Ellen Doe, and Cindy Doe (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have filed a response in opposition, (Doc. 46), and the Government has replied, (Doc. 49). <
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017-04-25 · Published · cited 26× · 250 F. Supp. 3d 856; 2017 WL 1487439; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62790
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the requests in the Plaintiffs’ Mo*867tion to Strike Affirmative Defenses, filed November 4, 2015 (Doc. 191)(“Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses”); (ii) the requests in the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on