⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “MCCALISTER v. COOK INCORPORATED”

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015-06-23 · Published · cited 42× · 790 F.3d 1059; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10631; 2015 WL 3857270
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION After multiple attempts over the course of fourteen years to attack his federal convictions on various drug and firearm charges, Jeffrey Dan Williams filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma seeking to withdraw his guilty plea baséd on newly discovered evidence. Specifically, Mr. Williams submitted affidavits in support
People v. Smithpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 2018-07-26 · Published · cited 28× · 918 N.W.2d 718; 502 Mich. 624
VIVIANO, J. **627As part of defendant's plea deal, he agreed to resign his position as a state senator and not seek public office during his five-year probationary term. After reviewing the agreement, the trial court determined that these terms violated the separation-of-powers doctrine and public policy. It struck down the terms but, over th
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004-03-30 · Published · cited 35× · 2004 OK 19; 90 P.3d 546; 75 O.B.A.J. 943; 2004 Okla. LEXIS 23; 2004 WL 615664
KAUGER, J. ¶ 1 We granted certiorari to address the issue of whether inmates who seek to proceed as indigents or paupers, but who are required to prepay filing fees pursuant to 57 O.S.2001 § 566.21 if they have filed three or more meritless civil lawsuits are statutorily denied due process or the constitutional right of access to courts guaranteed to all citizens by the Okla. Const, art 2, § 6.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004-03-30 · Published · cited 16× · 2004 OK 19; 90 P.3d 546
¶ 1 We granted certiorari to address the issue of whether inmates who seek to proceed as indigents or paupers, but who are required to prepay filing fees pursuant to 57 O.S. 2001 § 566.21 if they have filed three or more meritless civil lawsuits are statutorily denied due process or the constitutional right of access to courts guaranteed to all citizens by the Okla. Const. art 2, § 6.2