Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MC v. Seattle School District 1”
S. C. v. Lincoln County School Districtpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT S.C. by her mother and next friend, No. 21-35242 K.G., Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-02277- v. MC LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States
Heidi Jo Hendrickson v. Moses Lake School Districtpublic domain
Korsmo, J. ¶21 (dissenting) The jury determination that Ms. Hendrickson was the cause of her own injury should be dispositive here. The error in instructing the jury on the school district’s heightened duty of care was harmless in this circumstance. ¶22 I agree with the majority and the recent authority indicating that the plaintiff was entitled to an instruction indicating that the school district had a special
Fuentes v. Port of Seattlepublic domain
Appelwick, J. Nathalie Fuentes, while waiting in her car at the Seattle-Tacoma (SeaTac) International Airport’s pick-up drive for passengers, was injured when her car was carjacked. The carjacker was fleeing Port of Seattle police after they caught him breaking into a car in the airport parking garage. Fuentes sued the Port of Seattle, alleging it failed to provide adequate police and/or security for the safety of invitees at the
In re Search Warrant No. 16-960-M-1 to Googlepublic domain
MEMORANDUM. Juan R. Sánchez, J. Google Inc. seeks review of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter’s February 3, 2017, Order granting the government’s motions to compel Google to fully comply with two warrants .issued pursuant to § 2703 of the Stored Communications Act (SCA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2712. The warrants require Google to disclose to the Federal Bureau of Investigation electronic communica
185 A.2d 744 (1962) SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT #3 v. MAINE SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMISSION and Warren G. Hill, J. Wesley Oliver, Mark Shibles and Clifford Rosmond in their capacity as members of the Maine School District Commission. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. November 20, 1962. George A. Wathen, Augusta, for plaintiff. Richard A. Foley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, Bartolo
Clawson v. Grays Harbor College District No. 2public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 530 Petitioners Diane L. Butcher-Evans and K. Ann McCartney, part-time community college instructors, seek discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, which affirmed an order of the King County Superior Court dismissing on summary judgment their claim against community colleges for
129 B.R. 710 (1991) In re JOINT EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION. United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York. In re JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Bernadine K. FINDLEY, as Executrix of the Estate of Hilliard Findley, Uma Lail Caldwell, as Executrix of the Estate of Odell Caldwell, Edward Lindley, Joseph C. Jones and James William Barnette, Jr., on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly
State Ex Rel. Meany Hotel, Inc. v. City of Seattlepublic domain
66 Wn.2d 329 (1965) 402 P.2d 486 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Edmond Meany Hotel, Inc., Appellant, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE et al., Respondents, UNIVERSITY DISTRICT PARKING ASSOCIATES, INC., Intervenor.[*] No. 37321. The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two. May 27, 1965. *330
612 F.2d 821 5 Media L. Rep. 2377 HART BOOK STORES, INC.; Raleigh Books, Inc.; Tri-State News,Inc.; Ronald Mothershead, d/b/a R. and M. Adult Book Store;Jesse F. Frye, Jr., d/b/a L. & J. News Stand; Larry GeneMoore, d/b/a E. & M. EnterPrises; Thomas Page, d/b/aPlayer's Book Store; Joseph Raymond MC Broom, d/b/a MDistributors; Camera's Eye, Inc., a North CarolinaCorporation, Appellees,
United States v. Drapeaupublic domain
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, United States District Judge Before the Court is Garnishee Washington State Department of Retirement Systems's ("Department") objections to the writ of garnishment issued in this case. *1291Dkts. 8, 11 (collectively "objections"). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of and in oppositio
Gartzke v. Colvinpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER McSHANE, District Judge: Plaintiff Francia M. Gartzke brings this action for judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. This Court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). Gartzke, now ,48 years old, alleges she became disabled on April 1, 2003
Naggeye v. Colvinpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER McSHANE, District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiffs claim for supplemental security income benefits. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for a payment of benefits with a disability onset date of September 28, 2006. PROCEDURA
Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Ltd. v. Doespublic domain
CORRECTED ORDER ON SUBPOENAS [ECF Nos. 1, 3, 16, 21] LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION The order of January 6, 2015 (ECF No. 15)1 is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted in its place. The court denies the plaintiffs’ motion (ECF No. 3) to transfer this subpoena-enforcement proceeding to the United State
Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.public domain
Becker, J. — ¶1 The procedural protection due to an individual who faces revocation of community custody status includes, in some cases, the right to be represented by counsel at the revocation hearing. Whether counsel is appropriate in a particular case is up to the discretion of the hearing authority. We disagree with a previous Court of Appeals opinion allowing the Department of
United States v. Office Depot, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:24-mc-00034 (TNM) OFFICE DEPOT, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Fourth Amendment is a tricky thing for government contractors. On one hand, it protects businesses from onerous government se
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON FEDERATION OF STATE No. 83342-1-I EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL, 28; et al.† DIVISION ONE Respondents, PUBLISHED OPINION v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; et. al. Respondents, FREEDOM FOUNDATION,
Com. v. Sumpter, R.public domain
J-A14011-24 2025 PA Super 124 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : RIYAADH SUMPTER :
Sumrall v. Alipublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KIMMARA SUMRALL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-2277 (TNM) JANINE ALI, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff Kimmara Sumrall and Defendant Janine Ali frequently attend protests about the
VIRGINIA GIUFFRE v. BRADLEY J. EDWARDSpublic domain
Ciklin, J. Virginia Giuffre, a nonparty below, appeals an order granting defendant Alan Dershowitz’s motion to strike her various motions for sanctions. The order on appeal was entered following a voluntary dismissal of the ease. In the order, the trial court held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Giuffre’s previously filed motions for sanctions because the matter, had b
State v. Reederpublic domain
Fairhurst, J. ¶1 — Michael J. Reeder appeals a published Court of Appeals decision affirming his conviction on 14 counts of securities fraud and 14 counts of theft in the first degree. We granted review of two issues. |2 First, Reeder claims that subpoenas duces tecum1 issued by a special inquiry judge (SIJ) to financial institutions for Reeder’s private bank records violated his c