⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “MC v. Seattle School District 1”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-10-18 · Published · cited 9× · 16 F.4th 587
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT S.C. by her mother and next friend, No. 21-35242 K.G., Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:20-cv-02277- v. MC LINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017-06-08 · Published · cited 0× · 199 Wash. App. 244; 398 P.3d 1199
Korsmo, J. ¶21 (dissenting) The jury determination that Ms. Hendrickson was the cause of her own injury should be dispositive here. The error in instructing the jury on the school district’s heightened duty of care was harmless in this circumstance. ¶22 I agree with the majority and the recent authority indicating that the plaintiff was entitled to an instruction indicating that the school district had a special
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003-11-24 · Published · cited 0× · 119 Wash. App. 864; 82 P.3d 1175; 2003 Wash. App. LEXIS 2747
Appelwick, J. Nathalie Fuentes, while waiting in her car at the Seattle-Tacoma (SeaTac) International Airport’s pick-up drive for passengers, was injured when her car was carjacked. The carjacker was fleeing Port of Seattle police after they caught him breaking into a car in the airport parking garage. Fuentes sued the Port of Seattle, alleging it failed to provide adequate police and/or security for the safety of invitees at the
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-08-17 · Published · cited 0× · 275 F. Supp. 3d 605
MEMORANDUM. Juan R. Sánchez, J. Google Inc. seeks review of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter’s February 3, 2017, Order granting the government’s motions to compel Google to fully comply with two warrants .issued pursuant to § 2703 of the Stored Communications Act (SCA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2712. The warrants require Google to disclose to the Federal Bureau of Investigation electronic communica
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962-11-20 · Published · cited 9× · 185 A.2d 744; 158 Me. 420; 1962 Me. LEXIS 53
185 A.2d 744 (1962) SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT #3 v. MAINE SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMISSION and Warren G. Hill, J. Wesley Oliver, Mark Shibles and Clifford Rosmond in their capacity as members of the Maine School District Commission. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. November 20, 1962. George A. Wathen, Augusta, for plaintiff. Richard A. Foley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, Bartolo
Washington Supreme Court · 2003-01-23 · Published · cited 1× · 148 Wash. 2d 528; 61 P.3d 1130
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 530 Petitioners Diane L. Butcher-Evans and K. Ann McCartney, part-time community college instructors, seek discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, which affirmed an order of the King County Superior Court dismissing on summary judgment their claim against community colleges for
District Court, S.D. New York · 1991-06-27 · Published · cited 94× · 129 B.R. 710; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9128; 1991 WL 116967
129 B.R. 710 (1991) In re JOINT EASTERN AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION. United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York. In re JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Bernadine K. FINDLEY, as Executrix of the Estate of Hilliard Findley, Uma Lail Caldwell, as Executrix of the Estate of Odell Caldwell, Edward Lindley, Joseph C. Jones and James William Barnette, Jr., on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly
Washington Supreme Court · 1965-05-27 · Published · cited 4× · 402 P.2d 486; 66 Wash. 2d 329; 1965 Wash. LEXIS 866
66 Wn.2d 329 (1965) 402 P.2d 486 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, on the Relation of Edmond Meany Hotel, Inc., Appellant, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE et al., Respondents, UNIVERSITY DISTRICT PARKING ASSOCIATES, INC., Intervenor.[*] No. 37321. The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two. May 27, 1965. *330
Hart Book Stores, Inc. Raleigh Books, Inc. Tri-State News, Inc. Ronald Mothershead, D/B/A R. And M. Adult Book Store Jesse F. Frye, Jr., D/B/A L. & J. News Stand Larry Gene Moore, D/B/A E. & M. Enterprises Thomas Page, D/B/A Player's Book Store Joseph Raymond Mc Broom, D/B/A M Distributors Camera's Eye, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation v. Rufus Edmisten, Attorney General of North Carolina Randolph Riley, Districtattorney for 10th Judicial District E. Raymond Alexander, District Attorneyfor 18th Judicial District Donald K. Tisdale, District Attorney for 21stjudicial Districtdonald Jacobs, District Attorney for 8th Judicial District Dan K. Edwards,district Attorney for 14th Judicial District H. W. Zimmerman, Districtattorney for 22nd Judicial District Donald Greene, District Attorney for 25thjudicial Districtjames C. Roberts, District Attorney for 19th Judicial District, W. A. Allen,sheriff, Durham County, North Carolina T. B. Seagroves, Chief of Police, Cityof Durham, North Carolina the State of North Carolina William H. Andrews,district Attorneyfor 4th Judicial District William Allen Cobb, District Attorney for 5thjudicial District Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney for 12th Judicialdistrict Wade Barber, Jr., District Attorney for 15(b) Judicial District C.D. Knight, Sheriff,orange County, North Carolina Herman Stone, Chief of Police, City of Chapelhill, North Carolina, U. T. Incorporated, a Georgia Corporation, D/B/A Camera's Eye Bookstore Andmind's Eye, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, D/B/A as Mind's Eye Andimperial Book Store v. Rufus Edmisten, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina Joseph Brown, District Attorney of the Twenty-Seventh Judicial District and Individually C.C. Elmore, Chief of Police of City of Gastonia and Individually Petergilchrist,district Attorney for the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District and Individuallydonald Greene, District Attorney for the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Andindividuallypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979-12-04 · Published · cited 59× · 612 F.2d 821
612 F.2d 821 5 Media L. Rep. 2377 HART BOOK STORES, INC.; Raleigh Books, Inc.; Tri-State News,Inc.; Ronald Mothershead, d/b/a R. and M. Adult Book Store;Jesse F. Frye, Jr., d/b/a L. & J. News Stand; Larry GeneMoore, d/b/a E. & M. EnterPrises; Thomas Page, d/b/aPlayer's Book Store; Joseph Raymond MC Broom, d/b/a MDistributors; Camera's Eye, Inc., a North CarolinaCorporation, Appellees,
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 388 F. Supp. 3d 1289
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, United States District Judge Before the Court is Garnishee Washington State Department of Retirement Systems's ("Department") objections to the writ of garnishment issued in this case. *1291Dkts. 8, 11 (collectively "objections"). The Court has considered the pleadings filed in support of and in oppositio
Gartzke v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, D. Oregon · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 2× · 129 F. Supp. 3d 1040; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118666; 2015 WL 5178709
OPINION AND ORDER McSHANE, District Judge: Plaintiff Francia M. Gartzke brings this action for judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. This Court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). Gartzke, now ,48 years old, alleges she became disabled on April 1, 2003
Naggeye v. Colvinpublic domain
District Court, D. Oregon · 2014-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 43 F. Supp. 3d 1136; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116526; 2014 WL 4187516
OPINION AND ORDER McSHANE, District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiffs claim for supplemental security income benefits. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for a payment of benefits with a disability onset date of September 28, 2006. PROCEDURA
District Court, N.D. California · 2015-03-02 · Published · cited 6× · 82 F. Supp. 3d 979; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25970; 2015 WL 930249
CORRECTED ORDER ON SUBPOENAS [ECF Nos. 1, 3, 16, 21] LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge INTRODUCTION The order of January 6, 2015 (ECF No. 15)1 is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted in its place. The court denies the plaintiffs’ motion (ECF No. 3) to transfer this subpoena-enforcement proceeding to the United State
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015-10-26 · Published · cited 25× · 190 Wash. App. 786; 362 P.3d 763
Becker, J. — ¶1 The procedural protection due to an individual who faces revocation of community custody status includes, in some cases, the right to be represented by counsel at the revocation hearing. Whether counsel is appropriate in a particular case is up to the discretion of the hearing authority. We disagree with a previous Court of Appeals opinion allowing the Department of
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. Case No. 1:24-mc-00034 (TNM) OFFICE DEPOT, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Fourth Amendment is a tricky thing for government contractors. On one hand, it protects businesses from onerous government se
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2022-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON FEDERATION OF STATE No. 83342-1-I EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL, 28; et al.† DIVISION ONE Respondents, PUBLISHED OPINION v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; et. al. Respondents, FREEDOM FOUNDATION,
Com. v. Sumpter, R.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025-06-23 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 Pa. Super. 124
J-A14011-24 2025 PA Super 124 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : RIYAADH SUMPTER :
Sumrall v. Alipublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-08-04 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KIMMARA SUMRALL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:25-cv-2277 (TNM) JANINE ALI, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiff Kimmara Sumrall and Defendant Janine Ali frequently attend protests about the
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-08-30 · Published · cited 3× · 226 So. 3d 1034; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12473; 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1912
Ciklin, J. Virginia Giuffre, a nonparty below, appeals an order granting defendant Alan Dershowitz’s motion to strike her various motions for sanctions. The order on appeal was entered following a voluntary dismissal of the ease. In the order, the trial court held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Giuffre’s previously filed motions for sanctions because the matter, had b
State v. Reederpublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2015-12-17 · Published · cited 53× · 184 Wash. 2d 805; 365 P.3d 1243
Fairhurst, J. ¶1 — Michael J. Reeder appeals a published Court of Appeals decision affirming his conviction on 14 counts of securities fraud and 14 counts of theft in the first degree. We granted review of two issues. |2 First, Reeder claims that subpoenas duces tecum1 issued by a special inquiry judge (SIJ) to financial institutions for Reeder’s private bank records violated his c