Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2227 ___________________________ Maureen Johnson Plaintiff - Appellant v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois Defendant - A

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAUREEN MCDERMOTT, No. 17-99005 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:04-cv- 00457-DOC v. DEBORAH K. JOHNSON, Warden, OPINION Central California Women's Facility, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California

ORTRIE D. SMITH, SENIOR JUDGE *989Pending are Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #26), Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Doc. #28), and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #35). For the following reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Plaintiff's Motion

OPINION CLAY, Circuit Judge. In this action, Plaintiff Jeffrey Moldowan (“Moldowan”) asserts a number of claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as claims under Michigan state law. Moldowan’s claims arise out of his arrest, criminal prosecution, conviction, and retrial for the 1990 abduction and brutal sexual assault of

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered on or about August 13, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motions denied, the complaint reinstated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. On January 2, 2000, plaintiff was a passenger in defendant Maureen Johnson’s car when it was hit by def

McEVERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Deanne Stai-Johnson, formerly Johnson, appeals the judicial referee’s order denying her request to move out of state with the child over whom she has primary residential responsibility. We affirm, concluding the judicial referee’s find *826 ings on the Stoutr-Ha/wki

JOYNER, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 50), Plaintiffs' Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 54), Defendants' Reply in Support thereof (Doc. No. 56), and Plaintiffs' Sur-reply thereto (Doc. No. 57). For the reasons set forth below, we grant Defendants' Motion. This case arises from Plaintiffs' Walgreen Co. and The Kroger Co. ("Retailer Plaintiffs") allegations that Def

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class Action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED. INTRODUCTION Panacryl Absorbable Sutures (“Panacryl Sutures”) are synthetic, braided, undyed, absorbabl

ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsider the denial of Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Class Action and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a supplemental memorandum setting forth the laws of all relevant jurisdictions and a second proposed trial plan. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave is GRANTED, bu

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct

Order PER CURIAM. Johnson Controls appeals an award granted by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in favor of Kenneth Buhman, wherein the Commission found that Buhman suffered a compensable injury arising out of his employment that rendered him permanently and totally disabled. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 83) WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILE; AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (DOC. 80) Michael J. Newman, United States Magistrate Judge This civil consent case is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss the second *443class action complaint. Doc.

OPINION ON EN BANC RECONSIDERATION LEE GABRIEL, Justice. We grant the State’s motion for en banc reconsideration, withdraw and vacate our February 14, 2013 memorandum opinion and judgment, and substitute the following. See Tex.R.App. P. 49.7. Appellant Joe Dale Johnson appeals from his convictions for two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and one count of indecenc

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Marjorie Mungo filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code and listed Maureen Sullivan Taylor, her former divorce attorney, as a disputed creditor. Taylor filed a proof of claim in the bankruptcy court with respect to the fees that she claimed Mungo owed as a result of the divorce representation. Mungo objected to Taylor’s

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER L. BURKE Appellant, v. MAUREEN KELLY BURKE n/k/a MAUREEN BRIDGET KELLY, Appellee. No. 2D20-1398 September 3, 2021 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Christopher LaBruzzo, Judge. Timothy W. Weber of Weber, Cra

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated March 11, 2010, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the grounds that she was not at fault in the happening of the accident and that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Ordered that the order

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LORI TENHOPPEN, Personal Representative of the FOR PUBLICATION ESTATE OF CAROL PEASLEY, August 17, 2023

Case: 19-10474 Document: 00515126154 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/20/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-10474

949 F.Supp. 1153 (1996) Maureen JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-676 (AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. November 18, 1996. *1154 *1155 *1156 Rachel A. Onufrak, Joseph J. Bell & Associates,