Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MASON v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC”
OPINION FOR PUBLIC VIEWING BUMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ... 493 II. BACKGROUND ... 494 A. The Drug Approval Process ... 494 B. The Patents-in-Suit ... 495 i. The ’898 Patent ... 495 ii. The ’131 Patent ... 495 iii. The ’930 Patent ... 495
Mason v. Texaco, Inc.public domain
741 F.Supp. 1472 (1990) Diana L. MASON, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Plaintiff, v. TEXACO, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 78-1337. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 6, 1990. *1473 *1474 *1475
Clayworth v. Pfizer, Inc.public domain
49 Cal.4th 758 (2010) 111 Cal. Rptr. 3d 666 233 P.3d 1066 JAMES CLAYWORTH et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. PFIZER, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S166435. Supreme Court of California. July 12, 2010. *761 Alioto Law Firm, Joseph M. Alioto, Joseph M. Alioto, Jr., T
Cerveny v. Aventis, Inc.public domain
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. Mr. Alexander Cerveny was bom over twenty years ago with birth defects. 1 Alex- ' *1095 ander and Ms parents attribute these birth defects to Mrs. Cerveny’s use of Clomid (a fertility drug) in 1992, before she b
Small v. Amgen, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, Senior District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #82) filed on December 23, 2014. Plaintiffs filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. #89) on January 20, 2015. Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. # 92) on February 2, 2015, and plaintiffs filed a Sur-Reply (Doc. # 95) on February 10, 2015.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PATTI B. SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (“Kaiser”), Aetna, Inc. (“Aetna”), and Guardian Life Insurance Company (“Guardian”), collectively the Coordinated Plaintiffs, bring this case against Pfizer, Inc. and Warner-Lambert Company, alleging violations of the Racketeer Influ
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED Fall 2024 Term December 27, 2024 _____________________ released at 3:00 p.m. ASHLEY N. DEEM, CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK
Pope v. AstraZeneca ABpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JEFFERY POPE AND CYNTHIA ) POPE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) C.A. No.: N20C-06-116 FAR v. ) ) ASTRAZENECA AB, ) ASTRAZENECA ) PHARMACEUTICALS LP, and
Himes v. Somatics, LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA MICHELLE HIMES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SOMATICS, LLC, Defendant and Respondent. S273887 Ninth Circuit 21-55517 Central District of California 2:17-cv-06686-RGK-JC June 20, 2024 Justice Grob
United States Ex Rel. Lisitza v. Johnson & Johnsonpublic domain
765 F.Supp.2d 112 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Bernard LISITZA and David Kammerer, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson Health Care. Civil Action Nos. 07-10288-RGS, 05-11518-RGS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 25, 2011. *114 Christine
City of Chicago v. Purdue Pharma L.P.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JORGE L. ALONSO, United States District Judge On May 8, 2015, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order (“May Order”) [288] granting most defendants’ motions to dismiss. All that remained from plaintiffs first amended complaint were Counts I and II (consumer fraud claims) *1062against the Purdue entities. Plai
Estate of DeMoss ex rel. DeMoss v. Eli Lilly & Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Joseph H. McKinley, Jr., Chief Judge This matter is before the Court on a motion by Defendant, Eli Lilly and Company, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), 9(b), and 12(b)(6) [DN 13]. Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW Upon a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant
Seufert v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On February 27, 2014, the FDA published the following in the New England Journal of Medicine'. With approximately 25.8 million diabetic patients in the United States and 33 million in the European Union alone, the grow
Cross v. Forest Laboratoriespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL P. MILLS, District Judge. . BACKGROUND This cause comes before the court on the defendant’s motions for . summary judgment based on federal preemption [81] and on state law grounds [83]. ■ The court has *898reviewed the briefs, exhibits, and relevant law and is prepared to rule.
OPINION JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, District Judge. This matter is before the court on two motions to dismiss: (1) Defendant City of Philadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6), which motion to dismiss was filed on December 14, 2012 (“City’s Motion to Dismiss”); and (2) Defendant, Elser Street Properties, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6), whic
State v. Ronald Knipferpublic domain
2015 WI 3 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP225 & 2013AP578 COMPLETE TITLE: In re the commitment of Michael Alger: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Michael Alger, Responde
TRANSFER ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in thirty-six actions pending in or originating in the Central District of California move to centralize this litigation in the Central District of California. This litigation currently consists of thirty-nine actions pending in nineteen district courts, as listed on Schedule A
Rivera-García v. Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndezpublic domain
329 F.Supp.2d 213 (2004) Hector A. RIVERA-GARCIA, Delma Quinones, and the conjugal partnership constituted by both of them, Plaintiffs v. SISTEMA UNIVERSITARIO ANA G. MENDEZ; Colegio Universitario Del Este,; Alberto Maldonado, in his official capacity as Chancellor of the Colegio Universitario del Este and in his personal capacity; his wife Jane Doe; and the conjugal partnership constituted by both of them, Defendants. Civil
Northern Illinois Gas Co. v. Home Insurancepublic domain
777 N.E.2d 417 (2002) 334 Ill. App.3d 38 267 Ill.Dec. 614 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's and Certain London Market Insurance Companies, Lexington Insurance Company, Century Indemnity Company, Northwestern National Insurance Company, Stonewall Insurance Company, and Yasuda Fire and Marine Insurance Company of Europe L
In Re W.R. Grace & Co.public domain
355 B.R. 462 (2006) In re W.R. GRACE & CO., et al., Debtor(s). No. 01-01139 (JKF). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. December 14, 2006. *463 *464 David W. Carickhoff, Jr., James E. O'Neill, Laura Davis Jones, Laura Davis Jones, Pachulski Ziehl Stang Ziehl Young Jones & Wein, Michael