Cases

*290McGEE, Judge. Roy Donald Morgan (Mr. Morgan) built a house on a tract of land (the Jones tract) in Henderson County in 1965. When Mr. Morgan built the house, he also installed a driveway and decorative shrubbery near what he believed was the western border of the property. Mr. Morgan believed the driveway and shrubbery were on his property based on a land survey pre

PER CURIAM: Robert Lee Miles a/k/a Robert Lee (“Miles”) appeals from a March 27, 2013 judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (John F. Keenan, Judge) following a bench trial on stipulated facts. The district court found Miles guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and sentenced him to the m

06/06/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 14, 2024 Session MARY MCCABE PEIRCE v. LEE WESSON HOPE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-0819-21 Gina C. Higgins, Judge ___________________________________

724 N.E.2d 643 (2000) Elmer E. MILES and Mary S. Miles, Appellants-Defendants, v. David CHRISTENSEN and Jo Ann Christensen as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Jason Christensen, Appellees-Plaintiffs. No. 52A05-9907-CV-311. Court of Appeals of Indiana. February 29, 2000. *644 Kent M. Frandsen, Robert J. Donahue, Parr Rich

WOLF, J. Bernard Miles, a teacher formerly employed by the Nassau County School Board, appeals from a final administrative order of the board terminating appellant’s contract with the school board. The termination was based on alleged inappropriate touching of students by Mr. Miles. The board rejected the findings of fact by the administrative law judge (ALJ) that no inappropriate touching had occurred. The ALJ stated a numb

In re Miles, Peggy Lee; Miles, Susan Marie; —Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. 88,833, 102,102, 111,435; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA95 2503. Writ denied. Motion for sanctions denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

In re Miles, Peggy Lee; Miles, Susan Marie; —Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review; Parish of Terrebonne, 82nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 88,833; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA95 2503. Writ denied. Motion for sanctions denied. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

In re Health & Human Resources Adm.; Southeast Louisiana Medical Ct.; —Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 88,833; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA95 2502. Writ denied. Motion for sanctions denied. WATSON, J., not on panel.

REMY CHIASSON, Judge Pro Tem. This is a devolutive appeal of a decision sustaining the defendants’ motion for summary judgment to a petition for nullity of a judgment. A second judgment sustained defendants’ exception of prescription to a request for convening a medical review panel. From those decisions, this appeal followed. FACTS Plaintiffs’ natural father, James Lewis, S

In re Health & Human Resources Dept.; State of Louisiana; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA92 2112; Parish of Terrebonne, Thirty-Second Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. 88833, 102102. Denied. HALL and KIMBALL, JJ., would grant the writ. DENNIS, J., not on panel.

GONZALES, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s reliance on La.C.C.P. art. 1571 as dispositive of this appeal. The majority finds that the trial court erred in sustaining defendants’ motion for summary judgment which resulted in dismissal of plaintiffs petition for nullity of judgment. Based on the article 1571 requirement that district courts prescribe the procedure for assigni

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHNNY DUANE MILES, Defendant and Appellant. S086234 San Bernardino County Superior Court FSB09438 May 28, 2020 Justice Groban authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Canti

58 Md. App. 484 (1984) 473 A.2d 947 MARY JANE GILLESPIE-LINTON, ET VIR v. BEVERLY ANN MILES. No. 908, September Term, 1983. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 11, 1984. Walter Lee, Rockville, with whom were Charles Norman Shaffer, Peter I.J. Davis, Michael J. Grady and Shaffer & Davis, Rockville, on the brief, for appellants.

BEAM, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. This appeal and cross-appeal arise from a judgment of divorce in the DeSoto County Chancery Court. At the trial of this matter, the chancellor granted Brent and Tracy Williams an irreconcilable-differences divorce and resolved the issues upon which the parties could not agree. At issue in the direct appeal is (1) whether the chancellor erred by not prov

664 S.W.2d 512 (1983) Ethal MILES, Movant, v. Kenneth SHAUNTEE, Respondent. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, ex rel. Steven L. BESHEAR, Attorney General, Movant, v. Kenneth SHAUNTEE, Respondent. LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN COUNTY GOVERNMENT, Movant, v. Kenneth SHAUNTEE, Respondent. Joe CISSELL, Movant, v. Phillip RUSH, Respondent. Supreme Court of Kentucky. October 12,

13‐1158‐cr United States v. Miles UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term, 2013 (Argued: March 28, 2014 Decided: April 10, 2014)

421 F.Supp. 107 (1976) Mary Lee JAMERSON v. Carl G. MILES, Individually and d/b/a Miles Brothers General Contractors and J. M. Friedman. No. CA 3-75-0900-C. United States District Court, N. D. Texas, Dallas Division. October 18, 1976. *108 Robert M. Warner, Zimring & Warner, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff. Paul J. Chitwoo

GRIFFIS, P.J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. This appeal arises from a medical-malpractice suit filed on behalf of the deceased, Joe Carnathan. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants due to Mary Carnathan’s failure to properly designate an expert witness and supply an expert affidavit. We find no error and affirm.

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, One Charles Doe Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03301, of any editorial errors in order that corrections may be made before the opinion goes to press. Errors may be reported by email at the following address: reporter@courts.state.nh.us. Opinions are available on the Internet

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER John Z. Lee, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Pavel Zissu and Aise Zissu bring suit against the owner of the property where they resided, IH2 Property Illinois, L.P. The Zissus claim that after a Cook County Sheriff turned over possession of the premises to IH2 pursuant to an eviction order, the company removed all of their personal property from the premises and put it