Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2025-CA-00380-SCT PHIL BRYANT AND DEBORAH BRYANT v. DEEP SOUTH TODAY D/B/A MISSISSIPPI TODAY, MARY MARGARET WHITE, ADAM M. GANUCHEAU, AND ANNA L. WOLFE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/04/2025 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. M. BRADLEY MILLS TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: WILLIAM MONROE QUIN, II W. THOMAS McCRANEY, III O. STEPHEN MONTAGNET, III

HUMPHREY, J. [¶ 1] Kathleen Bryant and Thomas Bryant appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Lincoln County, L. Walker, J.) affirming, pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 80B, the Town of Wiscasset Planning Board’s approval of Allen and Melissa Cohen’s application to expand a building used to store fireworks for the Cohens’ business—-Big Al’s, Outlet, Inc. (Coun

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 28, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00024-CV REGINALD W. BRYANT AND FREDA R. BRYANT, Appellants V. BRAZOS KIDNEY DISEASE CENTER, CENTRAL TEXAS NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A., DR. ROBERT J. GO, MD, ADELE MARY GADLIN, RN, KAY DUNLAP, LMSW, JENNIFER ROBINSON,

OPINION After a jury trial in Superior Court, the defendant, Antonio Bryant, was convicted of simple domestic assault — his third conviction of a domestic offense. As a result of this conviction, the defendant was sentenced to a term of seven years — eighteen months to be served at the Adult Correctional Institutions and five and a half years suspended, with probation. On appeal, defendant contends (1) that the trial justice erred in refusing t

503 F.Supp.2d 1062 (2007) Russell J. BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. James A. GORDON; Mach 1, LLC; and John Urtis, Defendants. No. 05 C 3066. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 30, 2007. As Corrected September 11, 2007. *1063 Mark H. Barinholtz, Mark H. Barinholtz, P.C., Chicago, IL, for

483 F.Supp.2d 605 (2007) Russell J. BRYANT, d/b/a Russ Bryant Photographer, Plaintiff, v. James A. GORDON, Mach 1, LLC, and John Urtis, Defendants. No. 05 C 3066. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 6, 2007. *606 *607 *608 M

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Bryant Lewis and several other appellants own mineral interests that are subject to oil and gas leases in which Ener-Quest Oil and Gas, LLC and BP American Production Company have an interest. The group sued the companies in the district court in an effort partially to cancel the leases on the ground that EnerQuest and BP America violated implied covenants

268 F.Supp.2d 576 (2003) Elizabeth A. REEVES, et al., Plaintiff, v. ST. MARY'S COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.AW-02-2449. United States District Court, D. Maryland, Southern Division. June 13, 2003. *578 Elizabeth A. Reeves, c/o Mr. Li Bin, Chongquing, China, Pro se. Daniel Karp, Allen Karpinski Bryant

STROUD, Judge. Plaintiff and defendants Bryant/Sutphin Properties, LLC and Donald H. Sutphin appeal. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s entry of an award for unfair or deceptive practice to Bryant/Sutphin Properties, LLC and affirm the trial court on all other issues raised by the parties. I. Background Plaintiff and defendant Bryant/Sutphin Properties, LLC (“BSP”)

In the order resulting from that permanency-planning hearing, the trial court found the following: As to Ryan Bryant, he has again shown himself to be untrustworthy. The Court has made specific findings in the past that Mr. Bryant is not credible. The Court again today makes a specific finding that Mr. Ryan Bryant is not a credible individual and the Court can put very little weight in Mr. Bryant's testimony. This is a serious, sub

219 S.W.3d 280 (2007) Ronald BRYANT, Claimant/Appellant, v. COLOR ART PRINTING, Employer/Respondent, Missouri Printing Industries Trust, Insurer/Respondent, and Treasurer of the State of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Additional Party. No. ED 88749. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four. April 10, 2007. Susan L. Brown,

This is a divorce case. The husband appeals, contending that the trial court abused its discretion in its order of child support and division of marital property. We affirm. No useful purpose would be served in detailing the facts in this case. Suffice it to say, there was evidence before the court that the husband has the ability to earn more than his present income, which consists of his military retirement benefits. It is well settled that, in a case such as th

441 F.Supp.2d 1081 (2005) MATTEL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Carter BRYANT, an individual; and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendant. And Related Counterclaims No. CV 04-9059 NM (RNBX). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 4, 2005. *1082 *1083

329 F.Supp.2d 818 (2004) Carron Leigh Williams BRYANT Plaintiff v. MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY Defendant. No. 1:03 CV 577-D-D. United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Eastern Division. July 20, 2004. *819 Mary A. Connell, Mayo Mallette, PLLC, Oxford, MS, for Defendant. Jim D. Waide, III, Waide & Associates, PA

CARLTON, J., FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Keith Smith appeals- the Adams County Chancery Court’s February 6, 2016 judgment that found that, at the time Mary Smith filed her June 1, 2010 contempt motion against Keith, the statute of limitations had not yet expired oh Mary’s ability to collect a prior judgment against Keith for $116,000. The chancello

67 So.3d 422 (2011) Shawn BENNETT, Jr., a minor, by and through his Natural Parents and Guardians, Shawn BENNETT, Sr. and Samantha Bryant-Bennett, Appellant, v. TENET ST. MARY'S, INC. d/b/a St. Mary's Medical Center, Lee Benaroch, M.D., Palm Beach Gardens Community Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center, and Brian Kaplan, Appellees. No. 4D09-2725. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fo

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Jones v. State, 709 So.2d 512 (Fla.1998); De La Rosa v. Zequeira, 659 So.2d 239 (Fla.1995). W. SHARP, HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MARY E. BOLLERO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00883-COA KENNETH PEYTON BRYANT APPELLANT v. JENNIFER HART BRYANT APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/29/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. VICKI B. DANIELS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELL

244 F.Supp.2d 581 (2003) Martin FAIRCLOUGH v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. MARY'S COUNTY, MARYLAND No. CIV.A.DKC 2001-4012. United States District Court, D. Maryland. February 4, 2003. *582 Joe C. Ashworth, Law Office, Leonardtown, MD, for Martin Fairclough. Daniel Karp, Allen Karpinski, Bryant and Karp PA, Baltimo