Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “MARTIN MANION and SUZANNE MANION”
Suzanne Figueroa and Luis Figueroa v. Evangelical Covenant Church D/B/A North Park Collegepublic domain
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. The central issue in this diversity case is whether, under Illinois law, North Park College (“North Park”) owed Suzanne Figueroa a duty to protect her from criminal attack. In this appeal Figueroa and her husband argue that material issues of fact exist as to the existence of such a duty, so that the district court’s grant of su
United States v. Geaslandpublic domain
ORDER Richard Geasland pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), and was ordered to serve a prison term of 120 months. Geasland appeals the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized in the search of his apartment as well as the district court’s determination that a prior Wisconsin conviction for sexual assault of a minor qualifies as a conviction under a state law relating to abusi
United States v. Arturo Torres and Ramon R. Vargas-Hernandez, Also Known as Ramon Vargaspublic domain
COFFEY, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals an order after a suppression hearing before trial suppressing 1) some 450 pounds of marijuana discovered in a trailer that was being towed by a Chevrolet- Blazer in which defendant Arturo Torres, the owner, was a passenger and which Ramon Vargas-Hernandez (“Vargas”) was driving, and 2) post-arrest inculpatory statements made by the
United States v. Gary T. Whitlowpublic domain
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Gary T. Whitlow of ten counts of possessing automatic weapons in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). Mr. Whit-low challenges the district court’s admission of certain evidence and also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to his conviction on counts seven through ten. For the reasons set forth in the following opinion, we aff
575 N.W.2d 751 (1998) 456 Mich. 590 BOARD OF COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONERS FOR the COUNTY OF OAKLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee. Frank J. KELLEY, Attorney General for the State of Michigan, ex rel. DIRECTOR OF the MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Defendant-A
Howling v. State Abongnelah v. Statepublic domain
Mashour Howling v. State of Maryland, No. 35, September Term, 2021; Funiba Abongnelah v. State of Maryland, No. 36, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW – STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – PROHIBITED POSSESSION OF FIREARM AND AMMUNITION The United States Supreme Court in Rehaif v. United States, 588 U.S. ___,139 S. Ct. 2191 (2019) interpreted 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), a federal statute prohibiting possession of a firearm, to require proof of the defendant’s knowledge of possessing a fir
ORDER This matter originated in this Court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “Commission”) pursuant to Gov. Bar R. X, Sec. 6, Div. (A)(1)(b) and Div. (A)(2)(d). The Commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys and judges, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the applicable continuing legal education provisions of Gov. Bar R. X and Gov. J
United States v. Mae Braxtonpublic domain
WILL, Senior District Judge. Ms. Mae Braxton appeals from her conviction for aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1982). Ms. Braxton alleges errors in the admission of the testimony of two government witnesses and in the instructions given the jury by the trial judge. We affirm her conviction.
In Re Toyota Motor Corp.public domain
785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
754 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2010) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to: All personal liability/wrong death cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. December 9, 2010. *1211 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
People v. Anthonypublic domain
90 Ill. App.3d 859 (1980) 418 N.E.2d 757 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAWRENCE ANTHONY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 79-1918. Illinois Appellate Court First District (1st Division). Opinion filed November 17, 1980. *860 James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Suzanne M.
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 3762693 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/14/201
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS