⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “MARSH SUPERMARKETS, LLC v. UNITED EGG PRODUCERS, INC.”

District Court, C.D. California · 2015-01-21 · Published · cited 3× · 80 F. Supp. 3d 1058; 96 Fed. R. Serv. 652; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9195; 2015 WL 294101
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On December 12, 2014, Mori Rubin, regional director of Region 31 of the National Labor Relations Board, acting for and *1064on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”), filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction under Section
District Court, E.D. California · 2004-03-11 · Published · cited 16× · 346 F. Supp. 2d 1075; 2004 WL 2785611
346 F.Supp.2d 1075 (2004) CACTUS CORNER, LLC, a California Limited Liability Corporation; Venida Packing Company, a California Corporation; California Citrus Mutual; and California Grape and Tree Fruit League, Plaintiffs, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; Ann V. Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture; and Bobby R. Acord, Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Defendants, InterCitrus, a Spanish Trade Association; Ibertrade Comm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-07-25 · Published · cited 2× · 415 F.3d 1078; 27 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1570; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 15148
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge. We must decide whether the district court erred in issuing a preliminary injunction prohibiting the implementation of a regulation of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) permitting the resumption of the importation of Canadian cattle into the United States. We conclude that it did and therefore reverse the district court.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-07-25 · Published · cited 36× · 415 F.3d 1078
415 F.3d 1078 RANCHERS CATTLEMEN ACTION LEGAL FUND UNITED STOCK-GROWERS OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; Mike Johanns, in his capacity as the Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellants. No. 05-35264. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 13, 20
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010-12-10 · Published · cited 228× · 9 A.3d 882; 204 N.J. 320; 2010 N.J. LEXIS 1260; 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1803
Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010-08-16 · Published · cited 882× · 618 F.3d 300; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17107; 2010 WL 3211147
618 F.3d 300 (2010) In re INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION OptiCare Health Systems, Inc., Comcar Industries, Inc., Sunburst Hospitality Corporation, Robert Mulcahy, Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, Glenn Singer, Redwood Oil Company, Omni Group of Companies, Bayou Steel Corporation, Clear Lam Packaging, Inc., Cellect, LLC, Enclave, LLC, Gateway Club Apartments, Ltd., Michigan Multi-King, Inc., City of Stamford, Belmont