Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 547 MAL 2019 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 349 MAL 2020 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 108 MM 2022 : Respondent : : : v. : :

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 51 MAL 2019 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : :

*505 ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2011, the Motion for Leave to File Memorandum of Facts and Law in Support of Claims Presented in the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, the Motion to Amend, and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal are hereby DENIED.

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2011, the Motion for Leave to File Memorandum of Facts and Law in Support of Claims Presented in the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, the Motion to Amend, and the Petition for Alowance of Appeal are hereby DENIED.

*803 ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2006, we VACATE the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County and REMAND for proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. Miller, 585 Pa. 144, 888 A.2d 624 (2005). Chief Justice CAPPY, and Justice CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER and Justice B

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 545 MAL 2014 : Respondent : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the : Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : LEMUEL JR MARRERO-MONGE, :

*803 ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2006, we VACATE the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County and REMAND for proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. Miller, 585 Pa. 144, 888 A.2d 624 (2005). Chief Justice CAPPY, and Justice CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER and Justice B

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2006, we VACATE the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County and REMAND for proceedings consistent with Commonwealth v. Miller, 585 Pa. 144, 888 A.2d 624 (2005). Chief Justice CAPPY, and Justice CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER and Justice BALDWIN join the per curiam remand.

914 A.2d 870 (2006) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Roberto MARRERO, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Filed November 15, 2006. *871 Karl Baker, Public Defender, Philadelphia, for appellant. Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth, appellee. BEFORE: BENDER, PANELLA and TAMI

ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2000, Appellant’s application pursuant to Rule 2501(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure to file a post-submission communication is denied. *212Appellant’s “Motion for Reargument and Motion to Compel Decision” and “Motion for Leave to File a Short Reply

NIGRO, Justice, concurring. The majority reaches the merits of two of Appellant’s five claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal to this Court. In my view, Appellant has waived all of his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to properly layer and develop them. However, since the majority concludes that Appellant’s ineffectiveness claims do not entitle him to relief, I concur in

ORDER PER CURIAM: AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2000, Appellant’s application pursuant to Rule *9102501(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure to file a post-submission communication is denied. Appellant’s “Motion for Reargument and Motion to Compel Decision” and “Motion for Leave to File a Short Reply

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 1997, upon consideration of petitioner’s emergency motion for a stay of execution pending the filing and resolution of a petition for a writ of certiorari, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s application is GRANTED and his execution will be stayed pending action by the United States Supreme Court on his petition for writ of certiorari fro

*855OPINION BY Judge McGINLEY. Miguel A. Marrero, M.D. (Petitioner) petitions for review of the State Board of Medicine’s (Board)1 Final Adjudication and Order issued on January 26, 2005, which placed his license on probation, imposed a civil penalty in the amount of $10,000, and ordered him to complete a course on physician/

*600 OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT CASTILLE, Justice. Following a six (6) day jury trial, appellant was convicted of first degree murder,1 burglary,2 theft by unlawful taking or disposition,3 and possession of an instrument of crime

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 1997, upon consideration of petitioner’s emergency motion for a stay of execution pending the filing and resolution of a petition for a writ of certiorari, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s application is GRANTED and his execution will be stayed pending action by the United States Supreme Court on his petition for

Cordy, J. On the evening of February 17, 2005, Jose Costoso was murdered in the parking lot of a Wendy’s restaurant in Springfield. He was beaten by a group of men and shot twice at *236close range. The defendant, Jose M. Marrero, was subsequently indicted for the murder and, after a jury trial, was found guilty of premeditated murder in the first degree.1</

Judgment of sentence affirmed.