Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GINA MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. No. 19-cv-2560 (DLF) KILOLO KIJAKAZI,1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER In this action, plaintiff Gina Mitchell challenges the Social Secu

32 F.Supp.2d 1015 (1999) CONAGRA, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARKWRIGHT MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. and The Hobbs Group, Inc., Defendants. No. 95 C 3738. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 8, 1999. Gerald G. Saltarelli, Michael A. Stick, Peter G. Land, Butler, Rubin, Saltarelli & Boyd, Chicago, IL, Jill Arlene Dougherty, Richard H. Ferri, Jo

687 F.Supp.2d 103 (2009) In the Matter of the APPLICATION OF Elliot MADISON and Elena Madison, James Weiss and Irina Weiss, Jennifer Sobolewski, Michael Wallschlaeger, and Maik Hasenbank, for an order, pursuant to Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure returning property unlawfully seized from the premises 33-28 88th Street, Queens, New York, on October 1, 2009. No. 09-mc-647 (DLI). United State

FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a district court judgment affirming a decision by the Secretary that claimant Ray Smith had ceased to be entitled to Social Security disability insurance benefits. I. On December 13, 1976, Smith fell and was hit by a rail car wh

TimliN, J. The value of the lumber in controversy was $6,621.92 after it had been manufactured, hauled, and when ready for market. The labor liens thereon were $4,000 and the plaintiff’s claim for stump age was $9,000. But there was included in this $9,000 some pre-existing indebtedness of Swenty to the plaintiff. Deducting this at the highest amount claimed and we still have the amount due for stump-age about equal to the manu

545 N.W.2d 678 (1996) FLUOROWARE, INC., Respondent, v. CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES, et al., Defendants (C3-95-1809), Appellants (CX-95-1810), United States Fire Insurance Company, Appellant (C3-95-1809), Crum & Forster Insurance Organizations, et al., Defendants (CX-95-1810). Nos. C3-95-1809, CX-95-1810. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 2, 1996.

64 F.Supp.2d 754 (1999) CONAGRA, INC. Plaintiff, v. ARKWRIGHT MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. and The Hobbs Group, Inc., Defendants. No. 95 C 3738. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 10, 1999. *755 *756 *757 Gerald G. Saltarelli,

524 F.Supp.2d 95 (2007) Alexander STAHOVICH, Jr., Plaintiff v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration,[1] Defendant. Civil Action No. 06-30092-KPN. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 9, 2007. Charles R. Casartello, Jr., Earlon L. Seeley, III, Pellegrini Seeley Ryan & *96

PER CURIAM. On September 9, 1985, the appellant filed a petition for rehearing and suggestion of rehearing en banc in this case. All of the judges on the panel have voted to deny the petition for rehearing. One of the judges in regular active service requested a vote on the suggestion of rehearing en banc, which failed to receive the votes of a majority. Judges Eschbach, Posner, Coffey, Easterbrook, and Ripple voted to grant

12 F.Supp.2d 1028 (1997) Son Thi KHUU, Plaintiff, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. CV 96-0676 TJH (JG). United States District Court, C.D. California. March 6, 1997. Finkelberg & Finkelberg, Louis I. Finkelberg, Ellen S. Finkelberg, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff. Nora M. Manella, U.S. Attorney, Leon

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Stephens v. Heckler, — F.2d-No. 84-1994 (7th Cir. June 21, 1985), holds that *711 when physicians who have examined a claimant for disability benefits disagree about the severity of the claimant’s impairment,

776 F.2d 166 Unempl.Ins.Rep. CCH 16,379Edna JOHNSON and Jerome Montgomery, on their own behalf andon behalf of all others similarly situated,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary, U.S. Department of Healthand Human Services, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 85-1254, 85-1490. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Oct. 30, 1985.<

602 F.Supp. 1169 (1985) Edward M. HALL, Plaintiff, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Defendant. No. C-84-2932-WWS. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 11, 1985. *1170 Kim Malcheski, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff. Sandra L. Willis, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal.,