Cases

McFarland, J. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a Washington County Court of Common Pleas judgment entry sentencing Appellant, Cody Keene, after he entered pleas of guilt to three counts of rape, in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) and R.C. 2971.03, as well as one count of corrupting another with drugs, in violation of R.C. 2925.02(A)(4)(a). On appeal, Appellant contends that: 1) his sentence of life imprisonment with the po

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Angela D. Keene, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dennis Seay, Deceased, and Linda Seay, Respondents, v. CNA Holdings, LLC, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2019-000816 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Spartanburg County D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28052 Heard June 11,

980 F.2d 411 24 Fed.R.Serv.3d 176, Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 13,352 Grace TRAGARZ, individually and as Special Administrator ofthe Estate of Henry Tragarz, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.KEENE CORPORATION, individually and as successor-in-interestof the Baldwin-Ehret-Hill Company, andOwens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, aDelaware Corporation,Defendants-Appellants. Nos.

107 P.3d 693 (2005) 2005 UT App 37 Andrea N. KEENE, Petitioner and Appellee, v. Ashley J. BONSER, Respondent and Appellant. No. 20030841-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. January 27, 2005. *694 James A. McIntyre, McIntyre & Golden LC, Salt Lake City, for Appellant. Randall T. Gaither, Salt Lake City

769 F.Supp.2d 20 (2011) VIP MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant, and, TD Bank, N.A., Defendant. Civil Action No. 08cv10562-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 11, 2011. *22 Bradford E. Keene, The Law Offices of Bradford Eliot Keene P.C., Robert S. Wolfe, Robert Wolfe A

FILED MAR 28, 2013 In the Office of the Clerk of Court W A State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE KEENE VALLEY VENTURES, INC., a ) No. 30286-S-III Wa

Korsmo, C.J. ¶1 — The trial court in this inverse condemnation action granted nominal damages to plaintiff Keene Valley Ventures (KW) and declined to award attorney fees. In this appeal, KW argues that it had no burden of proving the amount of its damages. We disagree and affirm. FACTS ¶2 Ron Johnson is the sole shareholder and director of Baines Corporation, as well as the sole shareholder,

Merrick, P.J. This is an action for breach of the defendant’s agreement to perform the mechanical restoration of the plaintiff’s automobile. The record indicates that in 1993, plaintiff Stephen Keene brought his 1967 Ford Mustang to defendant Matthew Moylan, d/b/a Mad Man Cycles (“Moylan”), for mechanical restoration after having had the car’s body restoration done elsewhere. Moylan quoted an approximate pric

ACCEPTED 03-13-00498-CV 4451721 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

Porada, J. Both the plaintiff and the defendant appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court awarding the plaintiff $4,108,311.66 in damages against the defendant on his amended complaint for medical malpractice. The defendant contends that the entry of a default against it by a Superior Court judge as a sanction for its failure to produce lost hospital records under Mass.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(C), as amended, 390 Mass. 1209 (1984), wa

RENDERED: AUGUST 30, 2024; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2023-CA-0575-MR JAMES S. HAMILTON; AND JAMES J. HAMILTON LIVING TRUST, BY AND THROUGH JAMES L. HAMILTON AS TRUSTEE APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM PIKE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE THOMAS SMITH, SPECIAL JUDGE ACTION NOS. 13-CI-01304 AND 17-CI-00683 (CONSOLIDATED)

92 Md. App. 362 (1992) 608 A.2d 811 KEENE CORPORATION v. ABATE, ET AL. No. 616, September Term, 1992. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. July 1, 1992. F. Ford Loker, Baltimore, and Martin H. Redish, Chicago, Ill. (Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, and Holleb & Coff, Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellant. Timothy

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. This negligence action against manufacturers of asbestos insulation products raises challenging questions regarding cause in fact and comparative fault. And in particular contention in this regard are two issues: whether there is sufficient evidence that each of the defendant’s asbestos products were the cause in fact of the injured party’s disease, and whether the court should have admit

Asch, J. (dissenting). This action was commenced to recover damages for wrongful death, pain and suffering and loss of consortium, resulting from the death of Saul Didner as the result of his exposure to asbestos. The trial was partitioned into different phases. Thus, in the first phase, the jury was to determine the medical causation and the damages incurred. Immediately thereafter, the jury was presented with the liability issues

OPINION GRANT, Justice. Keene Corporation appeals from a judgment favoring Jessie L. Rogers, Jr., Eleanor Rogers, Robert L. Lofton, and Jo Emma Lofton in two consolidated asbestos cases. ISSUES In ten points of error, Keene contends (1) that the trial court and the presiding judge of the First Administrative Judicial District abused their discretion in refusing to r

OPINION OF THE COURT HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge. Raymond Jones (Raymond) and his wife Agnes Jones (collectively “the Joneses”) appeal from the district court’s denial of post-judgment interest on the portion of their asbestos-disease award due them from the Manville Corporation Asbestos Disease Fund (the Fund). The Joneses had won a $20,000.00 verdict. The Fund was responsible for $5000.00. We will affi

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge: This discovery dispute arises in the context of a class action suit brought on behalf of persons who purchased Bairnco Corporation (“Bairnco”) common stock between March 13, 1989 and April 2, 1990. The Amended Class Action Complaint alleges that Keene Corporation (“Keene”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Bairnco at all times relevant to this action, and defenda

542 Pa. 194 (1995) 666 A.2d 238 Mildred R. BAUMGART, Executrix of the Estate of Anthony J. Baumgart, deceased, Appellant, v. KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Successor-in-Interest to Baldwin-Ehret-Hill, Inc., a corporation; The Celotex Corporation, Successor-in-Interest to Philip Carey Corporation, Philip Carey Manufacturing Company, Briggs Manufacturing Company and Panacon Corporation, a corporation; H.K. Porter, Inc.

907 F.2d 104 Prod.Liab.Rep.(CCH)P 12,546Dorothy E. WHITE, as widow of Edward F. White, and DouglasE. White, as surviving son of Edward F. White,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The CELOTEX CORPORATION; Owens-Corning FiberglasCorporation; Owens-Illinois, Inc., an Ohio corporation;Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware corporation; GAF Corporation,a Delaware corporation; Armstrong World Industries, Inc., aPennsylvania corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOBILE NOW, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-918 (JDB) SPRINT CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Sprint is one of the largest wireless telecommunications carriers in the United States. For years, Mobile Now acted as one of Sprint’s “authorized repre