Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MAISONET RODRIGUEZ TORRES”
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI MILDRED MAISONET REVISIÓN RODRÍGUEZ JUDICIAL Procedente del Recurrida Departamento de Asuntos del v. KLRA2024000
Rodriguez Cruz, Eric v. Caribbean Restaurants, LLCpublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VI CERTIORARI procedente del ERIC RODRÍGUEZ CRUZ Tribunal de Primera Recurrido Instancia, Sala Superior de
Lopez Ramos, Javier a v. Padilla Rodriguez, Adlyn Rpublic domain
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL JAVIER A. LÓPEZ CERTIORARI RAMOS procedente del Tribunal de Recurrido Primera Instancia, KLCE202400791 Sala
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VII SANDRA E. ROSA Certiorari RODRÍGUEZ procedente del Tribunal de Primera Recurrida Instancia, Sala
Quiñones Felix v. Rodriguezpublic domain
Negrón Soto, Juez Ponente TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA RESOLUCION Mediante el recurso de revisión administrativa consolidado que nos ocupa, las señoras María L. Quiñones Félix y Silvia Lugo Torres, en lo sucesivo recurrentes, nos solicitan que revisemos unas resoluciones dictadas por el Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor, en adetante el DACO, el 29 de octubre y el 29 de diciembre de 1998. En la primera resolu
Mateo Rodriguez v. Ortizpublic domain
*84TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA RESOLUCION El 22 de septiembre de 1999, Francisco Ortiz H/N/C Paco Transmission, ("Ortiz") presentó el recurso de revisión administrativa que nos ocupa con el fin de que revoquemos la Resolución dictada el 24 de agosto de 1999 por el Departamento de Asuntos del Consumidor ("DACO"). Mediante ésta, ordenó al Sr. Ortiz que le pagara a los recur
United States v. Hernandez-Ramospublic domain
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. Heissan Hernández-Ramos ("Hernández") appeals to contest his sixty-month prison sentence following a guilty plea entered in district court to two offenses: *214 being a felon in possession of a firearm,
United States v. Santiago-Gonzalezpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Héctor Santiago-González (“Santiago”) was charged in a two-count criminal indictment alleging bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d) (“Count One”), and use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) (“Count Two”). Following trial, the jury returned a guilty verdict
United States v. Concepcion-Guliampublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1077 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. CARLOS MIGUEL CONCEPCION-GULIAM, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
People v. Scottpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Abraham Clott, J. *429The common issue in these cases is whether a person may be prosecuted for trespass as an A misdemeanor (Penal Law § 140.15) when he is found inside the lobby beyond the vestibule of an apartment building operated by the New York City Housing Authority whether or not the door to the lobby is locked.
United States v. Dudleypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1496, 23-1497 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOEL DUDLEY, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. George Z. Singal, U.S. District Judge]
Santos-Santos v. Puerto Rico Police Departmentpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PEDRO A. DELGADO-HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge. Before the Court is defendants’ “Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof’ (Docket No. 133), with a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) from Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas recommending that the motion be granted and the case dismissed (Docket No. 153). For the reasons explained below, the Court adopts
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III LUZ MARÍA GONZÁLEZ APELACIÓN LÓPEZ, GUILLERMO procedente del GONZÁLEZ LÓPEZ, Tribunal de Primera BLANCA IRIS LÓPEZ Instancia, Sala GONZÁLEZ Y OTROS Superior de
United States v. Norrispublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1842 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DOUGLAS NORRIS, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Patti B. Saris, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Soto-Beniquezpublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This massive drug conspiracy case from Puerto Rico involved a six-month trial and resulted in convictions of the eleven defendants who appeal, eight of whom received life sentences and three of whom received sentences of more than twenty years. The government charged this case as involving one overarching conspiracy from January 1990 t
United States v. Minayapublic domain
395 F.Supp.2d 28 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, v. Franklin MINAYA, Alberto Castellano, Silvio Guerrero, Leonardo Pina, Reynaldo Pina, Pedro Moreta, Julio Cesar Rodriguez, Angel Oliveria, Luis Gomez, Bernabe Martinez, Haris Javier, Defendants. No. 01 CR 619(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 12, 2005. *29
State v. Artwellpublic domain
832 A.2d 295 (2003) 177 N.J. 526 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Sherman ARTWELL, a/k/a Timothy Harris, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 18, 2003. Decided July 2, 2003. *297 Shepard K. Kays, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Yvonne Smith Segars,
United States v. Vicente-Ariaspublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Appellants José Peña-Santo (“Peña-Santo”), José Ramón Vicente-Arias (“Vicente-Arias”), Jonathan Joel Gil— Martínez (“Gil-Martínez”), and Manuel Liriano de la Cruz (“Liriano”) (collectively “Appellants”) were jointly tried and convicted of conspiring to import cocaine and heroin into the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960, a
United States v. Deschambaultpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1275 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. RAYEVON DESCHAMBAULT, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. John A. Woodcock, Jr., U.S. District Judge] Before
350 F.3d 131 UNITED STATES of America, Appelleev.William Soto-Beniquez, Defendant, Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Juan Soto-Ramirez, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Eduardo Alicea-Torres, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Ramon Fernandez-Malavé, Defendant, Appellant; UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Carmelo Vega-Pacheco, Defendant,