Cases

360 F.Supp.2d 926 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Marquis ROEN, Defendant. No. 03-CR-63. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. February 25, 2005. *927 Mario Gonzales, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff. Brian Mullins, Milwaukee, WI, for Defendant. SENTENCING MEMORANDUM ADELMA

609 F.Supp.2d 386 (2009) Ronald LEDER, et al. v. Jerome SHINFELD, et al. Civil Action No. 06-1805. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 14, 2009. *389 Alan L. Frank, Alan L. Frank Law Associates PC, Elkins Park, PA, for Ronald Leder, James Boyle, Boyleder, LP Independence Motors, Inc. and Metro Motorcars, Inc.</

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0212p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE; │ NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONG

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0212p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE; │ NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONG

DAVID T. PROSSER, J. ¶1. Northwestern National Insurance Company (Northwestern) seeks review of a court of appeals' decision which reversed a circuit court grant of summary judgment to Northwestern.1 Northwestern asserts that the insurance policy it sold to Djukic Enterprises (Djukic) excludes coverage for personal injury claims arising from the ingestion of lead in flaked or chipped paint or dust pre

(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MARKETQUEST'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 205]; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIC CORP.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 216]; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BIC USA AND NORWOOD'S MOTION

157 F.3d 282 129 Ed. Law Rep. 935 Denise CHAVEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee,United States of America, Intervenor,v.ARTE PUBLICO PRESS; Nicolas Kanellos; University ofHouston, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-2881. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. April 20, 1998.As Revised Oct. 1, 1998.

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: This CopyrighVLanham Act case was remanded from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of its decision in Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996). The issue is whether Congress properly exercised authority

ACCEPTED 15-24-00113-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/5/2025 2:30 PM No. 15-24-00113-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 11-577V Filed: May 24, 2019 To be Published ************************* D.G., * * Petitioner, *

32 P.3d 373 (2001) Caleb ALDERMAN; Barbara Alderman; and Alaska Guestours, Inc., dba Fourth Avenue Theater Trolley Tours, Appellants, v. IDITAROD PROPERTIES, INC., dba Fourth Avenue Theatre, and Robert Gottstein, Appellees. No. S-9285. Supreme Court of Alaska. October 12, 2001. *378 Robert C. Erwin and Roberta C. Erwin, Erwin &am;

522 U.S. 287 (1998) LUNDING et ux. v. NEW YORK TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL et al. No. 96-1462. United States Supreme Court. Argued November 5, 1997. Decided January 21, 1998. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK *288 *289 *290 O'Connor,

326 N.W.2d 320 (1982) Edward SULLIVAN, as Executor of the Estate of Barbara Gayle Sullivan and Paul Edward Sullivan, Deceased, and Edward Sullivan, Individually, Appellees, v. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, Successor in Interest to Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company, Appellant, T.J. Moyer and Jim Huddleston, Defendants. No. 67872. Supreme Court of Iowa.

782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille

130 S.Ct. 876 (2010) CITIZENS UNITED, Appellant, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. No. 08-205. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 24, 2009. Decided January 21, 2010. Reargued September 9, 2009. *886 Theodore B. Olson, for Appellant. Floyd Abrams, for Senator Mitch McConn

727 S.W.2d 883 (1987) Melvin James SPRUNG, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEGWER MATERIALS, INC., Defendant-Respondent. No. 68670. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. April 14, 1987. *884 Charles Merz, Godfrey P. Padberg, St. Louis, for plaintiff-appellant. Albert E. Schoenbeck, Brent W. Baldwin, St. Louis, for defendant-res

CLARK, Circuit Judge: An offer of commitment by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to guarantee an 18 million dollar private bond issue for the development of San Antonio Ranch New Town (Ranch) spawned this environmentalist litigation against defendants James T. Lynn, Secretary of HUD, and San Antonio Ranch, Ltd., the developer. Charging violations of the National Environmental Policy Act of

790 F.2d 1174 43 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 385,40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,148, 54 USLW 2632,4 Fed.R.Serv.3d 721 INTERNATIONAL WOODWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO AND ITS LOCALNO. 5-376, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 83-4616. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. June 2, 1986

502 F.2d 43 7 ERC 1033, 4 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,844 SIERRA CLUB et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Appellees,Edwards Underground Water District et al.,Intervenors-Appellants-Cross Appellees,v.James T. LYNN, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housingand UrbanDevelopment, et al., Defendants-Appellees-CrossAppellants, San Antonio Ranch,Ltd., Defendant-Appellee-CrossAppellant, Texas Water Quality C