Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “MAIER v. 3M COMPANY”
LOURIE, Circuit Judge. This case, on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, raises the question whether an accused patent infringer’s suit for a declaration of non-infringement should be dismissed because the patent involved is part of an interference proceeding in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). The district court dismis
Afg Industries, Inc. And Asahi Glass Company, Ltd. v. Cardinal Ig Company, Inc., and Andersen Windows, Inc.public domain
375 F.3d 1367 AFG INDUSTRIES, INC. and Asahi Glass Company, Ltd., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CARDINAL IG COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee, andAndersen Windows, Inc., Defendant. No. 03-1078. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 13, 2004. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard D. Kelly, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Ma
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SALT MEADOWS § HOMEOWNERS § ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., § No. 94, 2023 § Plaintiffs Below, § Court Below: Superior Court Appellants, § of the State of Delaware § v. § C.A. No. S17C-05-018 (S) § ZONKO
NLRB v. Neises Construction Corporatiopublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1774 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NEISES CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Respondent. ____________________ Petition of the National Labor Relations
NLRB v. Neises Construction Corporatiopublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-1774 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. NEISES CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Respondent. ____________________ Petition of the National Labor Relations
Gemtron Corp. v. Saint-Gobain Corp.public domain
572 F.3d 1371 (2009) GEMTRON CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SAINT-GOBAIN CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2009-1001. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 20, 2009. *1373 David L. De Bruin, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Marshal
Marketquest Grp., Inc. v. BIC Corp.public domain
(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MARKETQUEST'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 205]; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIC CORP.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 216]; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BIC USA AND NORWOOD'S MOTION
Relume Corp. v. Dialight Corp.public domain
63 F.Supp.2d 788 (1999) RELUME CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DIALIGHT CORPORATION, Ecolux, Inc., Precision Solar Controls, Inc., Lumileds Lighting BV, Philips Lighting BV, and Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendants. No. 98-CV-72360. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 26, 1999. *789
Engate, Inc. v. Esquire Deposition Services, L.L.C.public domain
331 F.Supp.2d 673 (2004) ENGATE, INC., Plaintiff, v. ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES, L.L.C. and Atkinson-Baker, Inc. Defendants. No. 01 C 6204. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 20, 2004. *674 *675 *676 Joseph A. Grear, Law
In re Bergpublic domain
MICHEL, Circuit Judge. Todd A. Berg, Donley D. Rowenhorst, James G. Berg and William K. Leonard (collectively, “Berg”) appeal the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (the “PTO’s”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the “Board”) upholding the examiner’s rejection of all the claims of patent application Serial No. 07/9.18,360 (the “application”), based on certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,201,
Sides, Thomas Raypublic domain
.e-" l , _ E a copy of the order of appointment is 'appended. W,@U' 15 No.` ' IN THE_ sUPREME_ CoURT oF TH`E UNITED_ sTATEs ]h @\.EJQ J\\~»Jr Q§\;: 1 maj l?q\/ 51'<{6 _PETiTioNER @@Uvoeocr~M/u areas (You`r Name) _ l . mens lay @m§ ‘ -v`s. - ' ,- - . - - » ' - '- _ Auel/él@@sta,©lea< ~~ 642 imc of fixed ,_-REsPoNDENT<s) ` Couf+ clc Cf\-_~\\r\c¢\ jqpp€q/ 5 n MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPE'RIS The petitioner asks leave to file the attached petition for a writ of cert
OPINION GORDON THOMPSON, Jr., District Judge: These appeals arise from an action for injunctive relief and damages based on trademark infringement and unfair competition. Jurisdiction was properly laid in the District Court by virtue of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq.) and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), (b). Jurisdiction here is under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 15 U.S.C. § 1121. Plaintiffs ap
Alvarado, Jose Zamarripapublic domain
!, § (;OF 1 1111)11»'161)`011 101 1110 C[ 51\)
502 F.2d 802 183 U.S.P.Q. 5 PACHMAYR GUN WORKS, INC., a corporation, and FirearmAccessories, Inc., a corporation d/b/a the MershonCo., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.OLIN MATHIESON CHEMICAL CORP. WINCHESTER WESTERN DIVISION, acorporation, Defendant-Appellee.PACHMAYR GUN WORKS, INC., a corporation, and FirearmAccessories, Inc., a corporation d/b/a the MershonCo., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
General Motors Corp. v. Cadillac Marine & Boat Co.public domain
226 F.Supp. 716 (1964) GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CADILLAC MARINE & BOAT CO., and Ash Craft Co., Michigan corporations, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3176. United States District Court W. D. Michigan, S. D. February 12, 1964. *717 *718 Barnes, Kisselle, Laughlin & Raisch, Detr