Cases

*129 ¶ 1. Eaton, J. David A. Gauthier appeals the Washington Superior Court, Civil Division’s entry of summary judgment in favor of employer Green Mountain Coffee Roasters 1 (Green Mountain) on his complaint for workers’-compensa

Vernon S. Broderick, United States District Judge Before me are four motions to dismiss filed by Defendant Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. ("Keurig" or "Defendant"),1 formerly known as Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and as successor to Keurig, Incorporated, in this multi-district litigation. This Opinion & Order addresses all pending motions, which seek dismissal of four separate amended complain

*1362TRANSFER ORDER MARJORIE O. RENDELL, Acting Chairman. Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiff in one Southern District of New York action moves to centralize this litigation in that district. The litigation consists of eight actions pending in the Eastern District of California, the District of D

14‐199‐cv Employeesʹ Retirement System, et al. v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2014 (Argued: December 1, 2014 Decided: July 24, 2015)

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 23-3-17 Vtec Mountain Top Inn & Resort Jurisdictional Opinion Appeal (#1-391) Decision on Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment This is an appeal from a February 23, 2017, jurisdictional opinion by the District #1 Environmental Commission Coord

Defendant Maple Parent Holdings Corp. ("Maple Parent") is a private entity that indirectly owns non-party Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., a leader in specialty coffee and single-serve brewing systems.7 Non-party JAB Holdings Company S.à r.l. ("JAB") controls Maple Parent.8 Plaintiffs City of North Miami Beach General Employees' Retirement Plan and Maitland Police Officers and Firefighte

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Bennington Unit Case No. 317-11-17 Bncv 207 South St Bennington VT 05201 802-447-2700 www.vermontjudiciary.org Gates vs. Mack Molding Co., Inc. DECISION ON MOTION This is a civil employment matter, pretr

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2022 VT 24

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: Defendants, Sturm Foods, Inc., and its parent company Treehouse Foods, Inc., manufactured single-serve coffee cups for use in Keurig machines and marketed them under the name Grove Square Coffee (“GSC”). The eight named Plaintiffs each purchased GSC, but were extremely unsatisfied with their purchase. They claim that Defendants packaged, marketed, distrib

Memorandum Opinion RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. This putative class action lawsuit arises out of a complaint filed by Cecile L. Zaycer (“Plaintiff’ or “Zaycer”) on behalf of herself and other persons similarly situated who purchased a Weis brand single-serve coffee product in Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and/or West Virginia. Plaintiff has sued Defendants Sturm Foods, In

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES ex rel. MELISSA ) STAGGERS and RHONDA ) KURDELMEYER, ) ) Plaintiffs-Relators, ) ) v. ) Case No. 15-cv-392 (TSC/GMH)

EATON, J. ¶ 1. This appeal from cross-motions for summary judgment involves a long-standing dispute between a condominium unit owner, Roy H.A. Watson III, and the organization that manages his condominium, The Village at Northshore I Association (Association). The legal issues center around the application of two laws, the Condominium Ownership Act (COA) and the Common Interest Ownershi

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH ) GENERAL EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT PLAN and ) MAITLAND POLICE OFFICERS ) AND FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT ) TRUST, on behalf of themselves and all ) other similarly situated stockholders of ) Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., ) )

CARROLL, J. *162 ¶ 1. This case is about two separate exceptions to the exclusivity rule of workers' compensation, the first of which applies when an employee is injured other than by accident, and the second of which applies when a person or entity can be held personally liable for an empl

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: Reporter@vtcourts.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2025 VT 17

CHIN, Circuit Judge: In this putative securities class action, plaintiffs-appellants are five employee retirement systems (“Plaintiffs”) that purchased or otherwise acquired common stock in Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (“Green Mountain”), the manufacturer of the Keurig single-cup brewing system. Plaintiffs allege that Green Mountain and certain of its executives (“Defendants”) made fraudulent misrepresentations about G

Case: 19-20298 Document: 00515532811 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-20298

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE AMERICAN BOTTLING ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N19C-03-048 AML CCLD ) MIKE REPOLE and BA SPORTS, ) NUTRITION, LLC, )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE AMERICAN BOTTLING ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. N19C-03-048 AML CCLD ) v. ) ) BA SPORTS NUTRITION, LLC and ) THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE AMERICAN BOTTLING COMPANY, Plaintiff, C.A. No. N19C-03-048 AML CCLD V. MIRE REPOLE, BA SPORTS NUTRITION, LLC and THE COCA-COLA COMPANY Nee Nee Nee ee ee ee ee ee ee” ee ee” ee” Defendants. Submitted: September 21, 2020 Decided:December 30, 2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION Upon Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint: GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Garrett B. Moritz, Esquire, Anne M. Steadman, Esquire, of ROSS ARO