Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “M. v. Zavaras”
M.M. v. Zavaraspublic domain
BROWN, Senior District Judge. Plaintiff, an indigent inmate confined in the Colorado Women’s Correctional Facility in Canon City, Colorado, filed this § 1983 civil rights class action alleging that the defendant, Executive Director of the Department of Colorado Corrections, had denied her funds for transportation and medical expenses for abortion services in violation of the 8th a
M.M. v. Zavaraspublic domain
939 F.Supp. 799 (1996) M.M., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Aristedes W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, in his official capacity, Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-WM-2010. United States District Court, D. Colorado. September 17, 1996. *800 Mark Silv
Koucherik v. Zavaraspublic domain
940 P.2d 1063 (1996) Richard KOUCHERIK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Aristedes ZAVARAS, Executive Director of the Department of Corrections and Donna Thurlow, Administrator of Time/Release Operations, Department of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees. No. 96CA0262. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I. November 29, 1996. Rehearing Denied December 27, 1996.
James M. Crater v. Roy Romer Aristedes Zavaraspublic domain
60 F.3d 837NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. James M. CRATER, Plaintiff-Ap
Beerheide v. Zavaraspublic domain
997 F.Supp. 1405 (1998) Charles E. BEERHEIDE, Sheldon Perlman, and Allen Isaac Fistell, Plaintiffs, v. Aristedes W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, Gerald M. Gasko, Acting Deputy Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, Dona Zavislan, Food Service Administration, Colorado Department of Corrections, William T. Potter, Volunteer Service Coordinator, Colorado Department of Corrections, and Does 1 Through 10, Def
P.R. v. Zavaraspublic domain
ORDER AND JUDGMENT.* SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate records, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of these appeals. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The cases are therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiffs in each
Butler v. Zavaraspublic domain
PER CURIAM. Rickey Lynn Butler appeals from an order of the Crowley County District Court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm the order of the district court. I In January 1996, Butler filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Crowley County District Court. The petition alleged that he was an inmate in the Colorado Department of Corrections (DOC),
Penrod v. Zavaraspublic domain
PER CURIAM. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Donald Pernod currently is serving a se
Jones v. Zavaraspublic domain
926 P.2d 579 (1996) Charles Franklin JONES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Aristedes W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, and His Staff at Arrowhead Correction Center, Respondents-Appellees. No. 96SA71. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. November 12, 1996. *580 Charles Franklin Jones, Jr., Cañ
Hall v. Zavaraspublic domain
916 P.2d 634 (1996) James Edward HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aristedes W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections; Ben Griego, Head of Classification for the Colorado Department of Corrections; Dennis Kleinsasser, Director of Correctional Programs; Margo Vaughan, Central Offender Management Specialist; Peggy Heil, Administrator of the Sex Offender Program at the Territorial Correctional Facility; Gloria Green, former mem
Vasquez v. Zavaraspublic domain
Justice SCOTT delivered the Opinion of the Court. The appellant, Paul Luna Vasquez, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Crowley County District Court, seeking immediate release from custody, or, in the alternative, an order to show cause why he should remain in custody. The district court dismissed the petition for habeas corpus without holding a hearing, and denied the motion to show cause. A
Furnari v. Zavaraspublic domain
914 P.2d 508 (1996) Lance L. FURNARI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aristedes ZAVARAS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections and Larry Trujillo, Chairman and Hearing Officer for the Colorado Parole Board, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95CA0568. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. February 1, 1996. *509 Bob Mullan, Denver,
Jose M. Escobar v. Aristedes Zavaras, Donice Neal, Gary Watkins, J. Early, R. Rodenbeck, and A. Montoyapublic domain
149 F.3d 1190 98 CJ C.A.R. 2818 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
Josephine Brown v. Aristedes Zavaras, Robert Furlongpublic domain
HENRY, Circuit Judge. Pro se plaintiff Josephine Brown appeals the summary judgment order of the district court dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
105 F.3d 670 96 CJ C.A.R. 2065 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,
Rodriguez v. Zavaraspublic domain
42 F.Supp.2d 1059 (1999) Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Aristedes ZAVARAS, Executive Director of Colorado Department of Corrections, Respondent. No. Civ.A. 96-D-2559. United States District Court, D. Colorado. April 1, 1999. *1060 *1061 *1062
Martinez v. Zavaraspublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Convicted of first-degree murder in state court, John Jacob Martinez brought a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition in federal district court arguing that his Sixth Amendment right to conflict-free representation was violated. In denying habeas relief, the district court found that Martinez had voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly waived his right to co
Litwinsky v. Zavaraspublic domain
132 F.Supp.2d 1316 (2001) Timothy LITWINSKY, Petitioner, v. Aristedes ZAVARAS and The Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents. No. 99-K-1234. United States District Court, D. Colorado. January 23, 2001. Andrew Burch Reid, Boulder, CO, for Petitioner. Roger Griffin Billotte, Attorney General's Office Criminal Enforcement Appellate, Denver, CO, f
Houchin v. Zavaraspublic domain
919 F.Supp. 1480 (1996) William C. HOUCHIN, Jr., Petitioner, v. Aristedes W. ZAVARAS, Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, Respondent. Civil A. No. 93-K-2651. United States District Court, D. Colorado. March 28, 1996. *1481 Jean E. Dubofsky, Boulder, CO, for petitioner. Wendy J. Ritz, Assistant Attorney General, D
Michael Lucius White v. State of Colorado Roy Romer Aristedes Zavaras Dave Holt Roderic Gottula Joseph McGarrypublic domain
TACHA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff, appearing pro se, appeals 1 the district court’s decision granting *366 defendants summary judgment on his claims asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Rehabilitation Act, see 29 U.S.C. § 794, and the America