Cases

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

JUSTICE MARQUEZ delivered the Opinion of the Court T1 We granted certiorari review to address a doctrine that has been described as "long cherished by law school professors and dreaded by most law students: the infamous rule against perpetuities." Byke Constr. Co. v. Miller, 140 Ariz. 57, 680 P.2d 193, 194 (Ct.App.1984). Specifically, we have been asked to determine whether section 15-11-1106(2), C.R.S. (2013

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL July 14, 2020 138 JULY, 2020 335 Conn. 138 Johnson v. Preleski ANTHONY JOHNSON v. BRIAN PRELESKI, STATE’S ATTORNEY (SC 20104) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js.

OPINION IRENAS, Senior District Judge: Presently before the Court are three separate Motions for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 117, 120, 124) Plaintiffs claims arise from an allegedly unlawful police stop and, when Plaintiff complained of the misconduct, a retaliatory criminal prosecution. I. Despite many of the pertinent facts of this case having been captured on vi

Opinion issued May 7, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00523-CV ——————————— LINDA S. NOWLIN, Appellant V. LORI KEATON, Appell

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: __________ 3 Filing Date: February 2, 2017 4 NOS. 34,257 and 34,564 (consolidated) 5 COLETTE C. JURY, 6 Petitioner-Appellant, 7 v. 8 VICTOR R. JURY, 9 Respondent-Appellee. 10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 11 Deborah Davis Walker, District Judge 12 Caren I. Friedman 13 Santa Fe, NM 14 Bishop Law P.C. 15 Julie Bishop 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 for Appellant 18 Kerry Kierna

818 A.2d 914 (2003) OMNICARE, INC., Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. NCS HEALTHCARE, INC., Jon H. Outcalt, Kevin B. Shaw, Boake A. Sells, Richard L. Osborne, Genesis Health Ventures, Inc., and Geneva Sub, Inc., Defendants Below, Appellee. Robert M. Miles, Guillerma Marti, Anthony Noble, Jeffrey Treadway, Tillie Saltzman, Dolphin Limited Partnership I, L.P., Ramesh Mehan, Renee Mehan, Renee Mehan Ira, Saroj Mehan, Maneesh Mehan, Rahul Mehan, Joe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Sentencing Memorandum, filed November 20, 2014 (Doc. 62)(“Senteneing Memorandum”). The Court held a sentencing hearing on December 4, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court should impose a 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(1), beca

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1894L Filed: May 2, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ELIZABETH ORR, et al., * * * Plaintiffs, * * v.

718 F.Supp. 1334 (1989) MARTIN OIL SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. KOCH REFINING CO., et al., Defendants. No. 81 C 1844. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. March 21, 1989. *1335 *1336 William H. Bode, Randall H. Bryant II, John M. Mason, William H. Bode & Assoc., Washington D.C

508 F.Supp.2d 295 (2007) GREEN MOUNTAIN CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH DODGE JEEP; Green Mountain Ford Mercury; Joe Tornabene's GMC; Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers; DaimlerChrysler Corporation; and General Motors Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. George CROMBIE, Secretary of the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources; Jeffrey Wennberg, Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation; and Richard Valentinetti, Director of the Air Pollution Co

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM 1 Presently before this three-judge District Court are eleven consolidated actions challenging as unconstitutional the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Pub.L. No. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81 (2002) (“BCRA”) and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief to prohibit its enforcement. The wide range of legal challenges raised by this litigati

HEARING OFFICER’S REPORT KENNETH R. HARKINS, Hearing Officer. This congressional reference case is concerned with a private bill to compensate Frederick Paul for legal services performed between January 1, 1966, and December 18, 1971, in connection with enactment of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971 (ANCSA).1 The bill was referred to the Claims Court by the Senat

638 F.2d 404 7 Media L. Rep. 1360 Steven A. PICO, by his next friend, Frances Pico, JacquelineGold, by her next friend, Rona Gold, Russell Rieger, by hisnext friend, Samuel Rieger, Glenn Yarris, by his nextfriend, Richard Yarris, and Paul Sochinski, by his nextfriend, Henry Sochinski, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BOARD OF EDUCATION, ISLAND TREES UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICTNO. 26, Richard Ahrens, Fr