Cases

Throughout the administrative review process, the parties in this case disputed the same two points: whether Martinez was injured in the course and scope of her employment and whether she was disabled. The benefit review officer's report listed two unresolved issues: "Did [Martinez] sustain a compensable injury ...?" and "Did [Martinez] sustain a disability ...?" Under the compensability heading, the benefit review officer noted that SORM's ultimate "[p]osi

281 F.Supp.2d 902 (2003) Jaime PEQUENO-MARTINEZ, v. E.M. TROMINSKI, INS District Director and John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States. Oswaldo Calderon-Terrazas, v. Aaron Cabrera, Acting Director, HLG/DO, the Immigration & Naturalization Service, and John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General. Eugenio Reyna-Montoya, v. Aaron Cabrera, Acting Director, HLG/ DO, the Immigration & Naturalization Service

377 F.Supp.2d 1138 (2005) Juanita MARTINEZ, Plaintiffs, v. CORNELL CORRECTIONS OF TEXAS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, Management and Training Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and Rudy Estrada, Cody Graham, and Luis Gallegos, in their individual capacities, Defendants. No. CIV. 04-0255 JB/RLP. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. April 18, 2005.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant Management and Training Corporation to Respond to Plaintiffs First Sets of Discovery Requests, filed December 28, 2004 (Doc. 80). The primary issue is whether the Court should compel Defendant Management and Training Corporation (“MTC”) to produce communications

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff Juanita Martinez and Defendant Luis Gallegos’ Stipulated Motion for In Camera Inspection, filed January 31, 2004 (Doc. 108). The Court held a hearing on this *212motion on February 3, 2005. On February 7, 2005, the Court entered an Orde

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants Management & Training Corporation’s (“MTC”) and Cody Graham’s Motion and Memorandum in Support to Enlarge Time Allotted for Deposition of Plaintiff, filed December 17, 2004 (Doc. 76), and the Defendant Luis Gallegos’ Response and Joinder in the Defendants Management and Training Corpo

ORDER DENYING SECUREW2 B.V.’S RULE 12(b)(2) MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ALL DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Plaintiff Cloudpath. Networks, Inc. (“Cloudpath”) sues various parties (eollec-*966tively, “Defendants”) for

598 F.3d 549 (2010) Armando MARTINEZ; Alinda Martinez, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.; WFC Holdings Corporation; Wells Fargo & Company; Wells Fargo Financial Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-17277. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Decem

426 F.Supp.2d 1163 (2006) Yvonne A'Rae LAISURE-RADKE, et al., Plaintiff's, v. PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CO3-3654RSM. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, At Seattle. March 31, 2006. *1164 *1165 *1166 Arnold Anderson (Andy)

174 F.Supp.2d 1125 (2001) Tina Gomes JAMES, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant. No. C00-614R. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma. April 13, 2001. *1126 Mary Lynn Greiner, Seattle, WA, Elie Halpern, Elie Halpern & Assoc., Olympia, WA, for plaintiff.

BATTAGLIA, J. The rapid rise of social networking websites, 1 themselves a branch of social media, 2 once again gives us cause to explore the authentication of documents related to this genre, under Maryland Rule

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARMANDO MARTINEZ; ALINDA  MARTINEZ, on behalf of themselves and a class of others similarly situated, No. 07-17277 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v.  CV-06-03327- WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, RMW/RS INC.; WFC HOLDINGS CORPORATION; O

62 P.3d 331 (2002) 133 N.M. 240 2003-NMCA-023 Floyd B. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jake SEGOVIA and Becky Segovia, Defendants-Appellees. No. 22,139. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. October 10, 2002. *332 William H. Lazar, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant. Daniel P. Ulibarri,

298 S.W.3d 663 (2009) Abel LUCIO, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. The JOHN G. AND MARIE STELLA KENEDY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION, Appellee. No. 13-08-00077-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. June 25, 2009. Rehearing Overruled September 17, 2009. *665 Charles B. Frye, Lindeman & Frye, Houston, TX, fo

KIMBA M. WOOD, United States District Judge This case arises out of harms allegedly suffered by Plaintiff Mary Tardif ("Tardif") during the 2012 Occupy Wall Street protests, in which Tardif participated. Tardif brings a variety of state and federal claims against the City of New York ("City"), the New York City Police Department ("NYPD"), Sergeant Thomas McManus, Police Officer Marsha Rumble, and Police Officer Felix Schmidt. At thi

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: This is a copyright infringement dispute between PaySys International, Inc. (“Pay-Sys”) and defendants Atos Se, Worldline SA (“Worldline”) and Atos IT Services Ltd. (“Atos IT”) regarding CardPac, a computer program owned by PaySys. Now before the Court is defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. (EOF No. 201.) Defendants assert that PaySys’

WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge *984Plaintiff Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Inc., and four of its health care providers bring this lawsuit against Wisconsin Attorney General Joshua Kaul, the District Attorney for Dane County Ismael Ozanne, in his official capacity and as a representative of a defendant class of District Attorneys, the Secretary of the Department of

NUMBER 13-08-00077-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRIS

900 S.W.2d 777 (1995) SHARM, INC., d/b/a Bingo Gardens, Appellant, v. Santos MARTINEZ, Appellee. No. 13-93-388-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. March 16, 1995. *780 Robert L. Guerra, John R. Griffith, Thornton, Summers, Biechlin & Dunham, McAllen, Portia J. Bott, Cooper & Huddleston, Dallas, Reynaldo Ortiz,

William Alsup, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION In this patent infringement action, each side moves for summary judgment on one asserted claim. For the reasons stated below, the patent owner's motion for summary judgment of infringement is DENIED . The accused infringer's motion for summary judgment of non-infringement and on damages is GRANTED to the exten