Cases

Adkins, J. This case presents yet another opportunity for clarification of when epidemiological studies relied upon by an expert provide a sufficient factual basis for the expert's testimony. Specifically, we shall consider whether an expert's opinion on causation, relying on epidemiological studies, suffers from the same "analytical gap" identified in Rochkind v. Stevenson

COFFIN, Chief Judge. This petition by Statler Industries, Inc. (Statler Tissue Company) to review a National Labor Relations Board order 1 and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement raise issues concerning the supportability of findings of violations of Sections 8(a)(1

910 A.2d 1171 (2006) Lynn WARNER v. CLARENDON INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 2005-415. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: May 11, 2006. Opinion Issued: November 2, 2006. *1172 Cleveland, Waters and Bass, P.A., of Concord (Mark D. Wiseman on the brief and orally), for the plaintiff. Mallory & Friedman PLLC

288 F.Supp.2d 127 (2003) Lynn WARNER v. FRONTIER INSURANCE CO. v. Clarendon National Insurance Co. No. CIV. 02-451-JD. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. October 29, 2003. *128 Mark D. Wiseman, Cleveland, Waters & Bass PA, Concord, NH, for plaintiff. Doreen F. Connor, Wiggin & Nourie, Mancheste

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Timothy S. Hillman, United States District Judge Introduction Plaintiff Harry De Prins (“Plaintiff’ or “De Prins”) asserts a single claim against Defendants Michael J. Michaeles, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donald Belanger and Trustee, of the Donald Belanger Irrevocable Trust,

ORDER R. BROOKE JACKSON, District Judge. These cases are before the Court on motions to dismiss filed by defendant Cinemark. On November 27, 2012 the Court referred the seven cases then pending to United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for various purposes including the preparation of a recommendation on the motions to dismiss. On January 24, 2013 the magistrate judge issued his recommendation

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. Defendant raises First Amendment and equal protection challenges to the Town of Babylon’s regulatory scheme governing the placement of noncommercial signs on residential property. After defendant erected freestanding signs critical of local law enforcement practices on the lawn of his Lindenhurst home, a building inspector for

*1140 Opinion LIU, J. These two cases ask whether employers or landowners owe a duty of care to prevent secondary exposure to asbestos. Such exposure, sometimes called domestic or take-home exposure, occurs when a worker who is direct

905 F.Supp. 65 (1995) Donald H. BROWN, John Markowicz and Paul Pushlar, Plaintiffs, v. Francis COSTELLO, Town of Fenner, Michael Larkin, Lynn Keator, and David Shephard, Defendants. No. 93-CV-149. United States District Court, N.D. New York. October 31, 1995. *66 Donald H. Brown, Chittenango, NY, Plaintiff, pro se.

803 F.Supp. 121 (1992) J. Ross HAFFEY v. Bob TAFT, Secretary of State of Ohio. No. C-2-92-851. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D. October 8, 1992. *122 Edward G. Bohnert, Bernard, Haffey & Bohnert Co., L.P.A., Lyndhurst, Ohio, for plaintiff. *123 Patrick A. Devine, Cherry

770 F.Supp. 78 (1991) Albert M. KLEIN, Blanche Tave and Daniel Slane, Plaintiffs, v. Harry E. GOETZMANN, Jr., John L. Bartolo, Lynn H. Smith, Henry A. Panasci, Jr., Chris J. Witting, Alvin O. Beiling, Robert C. Hayman, Thomas J. Prinzing and James J. Mosher, Defendants. No. 88-CV-780. United States District Court, N.D. New York. July 12, 1991.

361 B.R. 337 (2007) In re ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, et al., Debtors, ACC Bondholder Group, Appellants, v. Adelphia Communications Corporation, et al., Appellees. Nos. 02-41729, M47 (SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 24, 2007. *338 *339

Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti

Cutter, J. Moschella seeks damages from the city in this action of tort under Gr. L. c. 84, § 15, for injuries sustained on September 17,1960, because of a defect in a pub-*81lie way. The case was submitted on a written stipulation which meets the requirements of a case stated. See Hayes v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. 310 Mass. 81, 83; Quintin Vespa Co. I

256 B.R. 1 (2000) In re TOY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC., Debtor. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Toy King Distributors, Inc. Plaintiff, v. Liberty Savings Bank, FSB, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 90-00528-BKC-6C1. Adversary No. 91-022. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. November 9, 2000. *2

This case comes to us for a trial de novo upon an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage. The court entered judgment for the amount found due on the note secured by the mortgage and adjudged that the plaintiff be entitled to the possession of all of the property described in the chattel mortgage, and that the same be sold by the sheriff pursuant to law, and the proceeds applied upon the debt and that in event there be a deficiency that the plaintiff