Cases

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. In her action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff Veronica Mard appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment in favor of defendants Town of Amherst et al. Mard complains that the defendants terminated her injury leave benefits without providing adequate notice or opportunity to be heard, in violation of her right to due process under the Fou

Lee Fang v Town of Amherst (2025 NY Slip Op 02677) Lee Fang v Town of Amherst 2025 NY Slip Op 02677 Decided on May 2, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 43

BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by the Town of Amherst, New Hampshire; from an injunction granted by the district court. The injunction, granted on cross-motions for summary judgment, directed the town to grant permits to Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc. (“Omnipoint”), to build facilities to provide wireless telephone services. The case presents difficult issu

398 Mass. 793 (1986) 502 N.E.2d 128 TOWN OF AMHERST vs. ATTORNEY GENERAL. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. October 9, 1986. December 15, 1986. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, & LYNCH, JJ. Robert W. Ritchie, Town Counsel (Alan Seewald & Robert Troxell with him) for the plaintiff.</

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for false arrest, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution resulting from his arrest and subsequent criminal prosecution for obstructing governmental administration in the second *1237degree (Penal Law § 195.05). As we noted in a prior appeal, Supreme Court conducted a nonjury trial, following which the court “expressly found defend

Matter of Foxcroft Vil., LLC v Town Assessor of the Town of Fallsburg (2019 NY Slip Op 07822) Matter of Foxcroft Vil., LLC v Town Assessor of the Town of Fallsburg 2019 NY Slip Op 07822 Decided on October 31, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department </

Mancino v Town of Glenville (2025 NY Slip Op 00357) Mancino v Town of Glenville 2025 NY Slip Op 00357 Decided on January 23, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La

Matter of Lost Lake Resort, Inc. v Board of Assessors for the Town of Forestburgh (2023 NY Slip Op 06297) Matter of Lost Lake Resort, Inc. v Board of Assessors for the Town of Forestburgh 2023 NY Slip Op 06297 Decided on December 7, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department</

Matter of Empire Realty Invs. I LLC v Board of Assessment Review of the Town of E. Greenbush (2022 NY Slip Op 06052) Matter of Empire Realty Invs. I LLC v Board of Assessment Review of the Town of E. Greenbush 2022 NY Slip Op 06052 Decided on October 27, 2022 Appellate Divi

Matter of Granica v Town of Hamburg (2020 NY Slip Op 01542) Matter of Granica v Town of Hamburg 2020 NY Slip Op 01542 Decided on March 5, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporti

OPINION OF THE COURT Michael C. Lynch, J. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge respondent’s response to her request for documents in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law § 84 et seq. [hereinafter FOIL]). Respondent contends that petitioner is not entitled to the documents because the records are exempt from disclosure. On

Matter of Yonkosky v Town of Hamburg (2018 NY Slip Op 00586) Matter of Yonkosky v Town of Hamburg 2018 NY Slip Op 00586 Decided on February 1, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Re

Clark, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Meyer, J.), entered December 30, 2014 in Franklin County, which granted petitioner’s applications, in four proceedings pursuant to RPTL article 7, to reduce the 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 tax assessments on certain real property owned by petitioner. In these four proceedings, petitioner challenges the 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 tax assessments of real proper

Peters, P.J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Krogmann, J.), entered January 28, 2014 in Warren County, which granted petitioner’s applications, in two proceedings pursuant to RPTL article 7, to reduce the 2007 and 2008 tax assessments on certain real property owned by petitioner. Petitioner operates a Home Depot retail store on a 10.62-acre par

Clark, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Meyer, J.), entered December 30, 2014 in Franklin County, which granted petitioner’s applications, in four proceedings pursuant to RPTL article 7, to reduce the 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 tax assessments on certain real property owned by petitioner. In these four proceedings, petitioner challenges the 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 tax assessments of real proper

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 12-1600 PAUL F. SENRA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. THE TOWN OF SMITHFIELD; DENNIS FINLAY, individually and in his official capacity; PETER SCORPIO, individually and in his official capacity; SUSAN PILKINGTON in her official capacity, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UN

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 98-2061 TOWN OF AMHERST, NEW HAMPSHIRE, Defendant, Appellant, v. OMNIPOINT COMMUNICATIONS ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee. APPE

This action brought by the town of Amherst is to recover of the county of Erie the amount of unpaid *Page 367 taxes on the town roll for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 1931, returned to the County Treasurer by the town tax receiver (hereinafter referred to as collector). In December, 1930, the plaintiff town board prepared and filed with the Board of Supervisors of the county of Erie a budget of estimated expenses totaling $253,827, which aft

Matter of Brookdale Senior Living Solutions & Meriweg Latham LLC v Town of Colonie Bd. of Assessment Review (2020 NY Slip Op 05006) Matter of Brookdale Senior Living Solutions & Meriweg Latham LLC v Town of Colonie Bd. of Assessment Review 2020 NY Slip Op 05006 Decided on September 17, 20

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. In this case, the plaintiff T-Mobile Northeast LLC (“T-Mobile”) alleges that the Town of Islip (“the Town”) and the Planning Board of the Town of Islip (“the Board” and together with the Town, “the Defendants”) denied its request for a special use permit to construct a public utility wireless telecommunication facility, in violation of the Telecommun