Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CLAUDETTE LUTZ,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 03-15745 GLENDALE UNION HIGH SCHOOL,  D.C. No. CV-98-01076-EHC DISTRICT NO. 205; GOVERNING BOARD OF GLENDALE UNION HIGH OPINION SCHOOL, DISTRICT NO. 205, Defendants-Appellants.

MEMORANDUM * Claudette Lutz appeals the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, Glendale Union High School District (“Glendale,” or “the District”), in her suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (“ADA”). We reverse. The facts are familiar to the parties, so we do not recite them here except as necessary to explain our decision.

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: We probe the mysteries of demanding a jury trial under Fed.R.Civ.P. 38(b). I Lutz, a longtime teacher and assistant principal at schools in Glendale Union High School District, sued Glendale 1 in Arizona state court, claiming she was fired in

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, Senior United States District Judge The Secretary of Labor ("the Secretary") brought this action against Defendants Austin Electric Services and Toby Thomas ("Defendants") for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). Before the Court is the Secretary's motion to strike Defendants' jury demand from their Answer to the Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 263.) For the foregoing reasons, the

OPINION OWENS, Circuit Judge: Arthur Clemens, Jr., sued his employer Qwest Corporation (“Qwest”) for Title VII violations. A jury awarded damages for back pay and emotional distress, as well as punitive damages. On appeal, Clemens challenges the district court’s refusal to consider adjusting his lump

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARTHUR CLEMENS, JR., Nos. 15-35160 Plaintiff-Appellee/ 15-35183 Cross-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:13-cv-01793-JPD CENTURYLINK INC., Defendant, OPINION and QWEST CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee.

MEMORANDUM ** Ronald Dwane Brook appeals pro se a judgment entered after a four-day jury trial in his civil rights action alleging prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. We affirm. DISCUSSION 1. Dismissal of State Law Claim The district court properly dismissed Brook’s claim that prison officials violated Cal

MEMORANDUM ** Ronald Dwane Brook appeals pro se a judgment entered after a four-day jury trial in his civil rights action alleging prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. We affirm. DISCUSSION 1. Dismissal of State Law Claim The district court properly dismissed Brook’s claim that prison officials violated Cal

Filed 12/21/22; Modified and Certified for Pub. 1/20/23 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. B302426, B303196 MARY LYNN RAPIER et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. BC641254) v. ENCINO HOSPI

609 F.Supp.2d 181 (2009) Jose Manuel RAMIREZ-SUAREZ, Plaintiff v. FOOT LOCKER INC., et al., Defendant(s). Civil No. 08-2052 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 23, 2009. *182 Carlos Concepcion-Castro, Carlos Concepcion-Castro Law Office, Guaynabo, PR, for Plaintiff. Angel X. Viera-Vargas, Luis D. Ort

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1281 JOHN H. MACSHERRY, JR., Plaintiff − Appellee, v. SPARROWS POINT, LLC; COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.; MICHAEL ROBERTS, Defendants – Appellants. No. 19-1321 JOHN H. MACSHERRY, JR.,

CODRINGTON J. *504I. INTRODUCTION This is plaintiff and appellant Patrick Barber's second appeal in this case and raises an issue of first impression.1 Upon remand from Barber's first appeal ( Barber I ) , defendant and respondent, the California State Personnel Board

See dissent Filed 5/17/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO PATRICK BARBER, Plaintiff and Appellant, E068719 v. (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS1108683) THE CALIFORNIA STATE OPINION PERSONNEL BOARD, Defe

596 F.3d 1007 (2010) Jill TRAXLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-35641. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted September 2, 2009. Filed February 26, 2010. *1009 Daniel J. Snyder, Law Offices of Daniel Snyder, Portland, OR, for the plaintiff-appel

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JILL TRAXLER,  No. 08-35641 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. 3:06-cv-01450-KI MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court

Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-22-2006 Spencer v. Wal Mart Stores Inc Precedential o

588 F.3d 1261 (2009) Tannislado ALVARADO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAJUN OPERATING COMPANY, dba AFC Enterprises, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-15549. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 2, 2009. Filed December 11, 2009. *1262 Richard M. Martinez, Law Office of Richard M. Mar

Dooley, J. ¶ 1. Plaintiff, Robert A. Bloomer, Jr., brought this action against defendant, David Gibson, for malpractice in connection with his representation of plaintiff in a federal criminal case. The action was eventually tried to court on a theory of breach of contract and resulted in a verdict for defendant. On appeal, plaintiff argues that the court erred in denying him a trial by jury and in applying an “actual innocence”

789 F.Supp.2d 1221 (2011) Roslyn McCOY, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY — Army Corps of Engineers and Honorable John McHugh, Secretary of the Army, collectively, Defendants. No. CIV. S-09-1973 LKK/CMK. United States District Court, E.D. California. June 1, 2011. *1224 S. John Ota, Law Offices of John Ota, Alameda, CA, for Pl