Cases

Case: 21-11031 Document: 89-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 21-11031 ____________

Case: 20-70022 Document: 00516113390 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/01/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

Case: 17-70012 Document: 00516806960 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 30, 20

Case: 20-70022 Document: 00516702531 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 5, 2023

People v Lumpkin (2022 NY Slip Op 00477) People v Lumpkin 2022 NY Slip Op 00477 Decided on January 27, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Case: 16-70027 Document: 00515739449 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/09/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

People v Lumpkin (2021 NY Slip Op 00460) People v Lumpkin 2021 NY Slip Op 00460 Decided on January 28, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

Case: 20-70005 Document: 00515911045 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 23, 2021

Case: 19-70014 Document: 00515736266 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/08/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-70014 FILED

310 Ga. 139 FINAL COPY S20A0734. LUMPKIN v. THE STATE. S20A0879. GREEN v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. A Gwinnett County jury found Anthony Lumpkin and Eddie Green guilty of murder and other offenses in connection with the shooting death of Nicholas Jackson II. Both appellants argue that the trial court erred by denying their motions to suppress evidence seized during a traffic stop. In addition, Lumpkin challenges the sufficiency of the evidence

[Cite as State v. Lumpkin, 2013-Ohio-810.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 2011-CA-80 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 11-CR-244 v.

VAUGHN, Judge. Although plaintiffs alleged that they caused a plan to be prepared, that defendant Lumpkin had seen the plan and was aware that plaintiffs intended to develop the property according to that plan, plaintiffs did not plead the existence of a mutually agreeable plan of development. Defendants, in their answer, expressly denied the existence of such a plan. Defendant Lumpkin, in her affidavit filed in support of the

136 Ga. App. 828 (1975) 222 S.E.2d 669 LUMPKIN v. THE STATE. 51310. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Submitted September 30, 1975. Decided December 2, 1975. Stephen M. Friedberg, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, R. David Petersen, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. STOLZ, Judg

THOMPSON, Presiding Justice. This is a mandamus action in which a taxpayer seeks a writ requiring a school district to return “excess proceeds” collected pursuant to an educational sales and use tax approved by referendum. The superior court denied the writ, the taxpayer appealed, and we affirm. In 2001, voters in the Clarke County School District approved a one percent educational sales and use tax (ELOST) for

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-2-21653-9, Patricia H. Clark, J., entered December 8, 1999. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Becker, A.C.J., and Cox, J.

BENHAM, Justice. Appellee Stiles Apartments, Inc. filed an action for temporary and permanent injunctive relief against appellant the Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County regarding a parking area located on its property in the busy Five Points shopping district in Athens. In 1954, appellee and appellant’s predecessor City of Athens entered into the following contractual agre

Miller, Judge. William and Belinda Warnell appeal from the grant of summary judgment to the Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County (the “County”) in their suit arising from a collision between William’s vehicle and a police car owned by the County. The Warnells contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based on their failure to present their claims to t

OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: Defendants, Smith and Lumpkin, were convicted by a jury of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle and kidnapping. On August 30, 1969, a ear was stolen in Steubenville, Ohio and driven to Carnegie, Pennsylvania, where the ride was ended by

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Cir*756cuit denied. Messrs. Pinckney L. Cain and R. Beverley Herbert for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel 0. Clark, Jr., Messrs. Sewall Key and Newton K. Fox, and Miss Helen R. Carloss

249 Ga. 834 (1982) 295 S.E.2d 86 LUMPKIN v. THE STATE. 38479. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided September 23, 1982. *838 David R. Montgomery, for appellant. Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, for appellee. SMITH, Justice. This case comes to us by certiorari from the Cour