Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Electronics Co. Ltd.”
MOORE, Circuit Judge. Appellants Liown Electronics Co.; Shenzhen Liown Electronics Co.; and Liown Technologies/Beauty Electronics, LLC (collectively, “Liown”), and enjoined distributors Boston Warehouse Trading Corp.; Abbott of England (1981), Ltd.; BJ’s Wholesale Club., Inc.; Von Maur, Inc.; Zulily, Inc.; Smart Candle, LLC; Tuesday Morning Corp.; Ambient Lighting, Inc.; The L
Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Iancupublic domain
Dyk, Circuit Judge. Luminara Worldwide, LLC, ("Luminara") appeals from three inter partes review ("IPR") decisions, in which the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("the Board") held unpatentable a total of 31 claims across Luminara's three patents. On appeal, Luminara *1305 challenges the
Blackbird Tech LLC v. Elb Electronics, Inc.public domain
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Reyna. Moore, Circuit Judge. Blackbird Tech LLC ("Blackbird") appeals the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware's entry of judgment of noninfringement of claim 12 of U.S. Patent No. 7,086,747 ("'747 patent") based on its construction of
Case: 21-2369 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NIPPON SHINYAKU CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-2369 ______________________ Appeal from the United States
Case: 21-2369 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 02/08/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NIPPON SHINYAKU CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2021-2369 ______________________ Appeal from the United States
Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. v. the Toro Companypublic domain
MOORE, Circuit Judge. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin granted Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc.’s motion for a preliminary injunction precluding The Toro Company and Exmark Manufacturing Co., Inc. from making, using, selling, and offering to sell lawnmowers equipped with platform suspension systems that infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,186,475 (“the
ORDER ON ROLLING OPTICS AB’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IMPROPERLY WITHHELD (#192). KELLEY, United States Magistrate Judge I. Introduction Crane Security Technologies, Inc., is the exclusive licensee of the five U.S. patents at issue in this case.1 The patents “relate generally to optical systems that project synthetic images that ‘move’ and that