Cases

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR LUKE REYNOLDS, ) No. ED109902 ) Plaintiff, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court vs. ) of the City of St. Louis

KEARSE, Circuit Judge. Defendant Luke Jones (“Jones” or “Luke”) appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut convicting him, following a jury trial before Alan H. Nevas, Judge, on one count of conducting an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and C

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0045p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: FLINT WATER CASES. │ _____________

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-18-00353-CR WINSTON LUKE MCDANIEL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 43956 CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0687 Filed October 26, 2016 LUKE A. GIEGERICH, Petitioner-Appellee, vs. SAMANTHA A. LAHR, Respondent-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Dubuque County, Monica L. Ackley, Judge. Samantha Lahr appeals the district court’s order placing physical care with Luke Giegeri

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................... 1284 A. Procedural Background................................ 1284 B. Factual Backgr

Flaum, Circuit Judge. Rickey I. Kanter pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Due to his felony conviction, he is prohibited from possessing a firearm under both federal and Wisconsin law. At issue in this case is whether the felon dispossession statutes-

ROBERTS, J. The Appellant, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, appeals an order entered by the *571trial court that denied its motion to determine the interest rate payable on judgment. The Appellant argued that the 2011 amendment to section 55.03 applied to any post-judgment interest accrued after the date the 2011 amendment became effective. The trial court disagreed and

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 26, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D15-1634 Lower Tribunal No. 13-6984 ________________ R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company,

SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-appellants Aaron Harris, Lonnie Jones, and Luke Jones each were convicted after separate jury trials before Judge Nevas of charges related to their participation in an extensive drug trafficking enterprise in Bridgeport, Connecticut. Specifically, Harris was convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, cocaine, and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and was sentenced to life

206 F.Supp.2d 236 (2002) Maria ZUKOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. ST. LUKE HOME CARE PROGRAM, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 98-2211 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 14, 2002. *237 Idalia M. Diaz-Pedrosa, Carlos Fernandez-Nadal, Moreda & Moreda, San Juan, PR, Calle Salmon 45-A, Playa de Ponce, Ponce, PR, Gilberto

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 13, 2013 Session LARRY SCOTT REYNOLDS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-67618 Don R. Ash, Judge No. M2012-01978-CCA-R3-PC - Filed May 1, 2013 Larry Scott Reynolds (“the Petitioner”) was convicted by a jury of first degree premeditated murder

KEARSE, Circuit Judge. Defendant Luke Jones (“Jones” or “Luke”) appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut convicting him, following a jury trial before Alan H. Nevas, Judge, on one count of conducting an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: On June 25, 1990, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction generally directing Sheriff William Belt (Belt) of Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana, all other Louisiana sheriffs, and the District of Columbia (the District) to ensure that all prisoners held in Louisiana parish jails pursuant to agreement

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 18, 2010 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LARRY SCOTT REYNOLDS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-61326 Don R. Ash, Judge No. M2009-00185-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 16, 2010 A Rutherford County jury convicted the Defendant, Larry Scott Reynolds, of first degree prem

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA William Penn School District; : Panther Valley School District; : The School District of Lancaster; : Greater Johnstown School District; : Wilkes-Barre Area School District; : Shenandoah Valley School District; : Jamella and Bryant Miller, parents of : K.M., a minor; Sheila Armstrong, : parent of S.A., minor; Tracey Hughes, : parent of P.M.H., minor; Pennsylvania : Association of R

LABARGA, C.J. In these consolidated cases, the Florida Bankers Association (FBA) and Robert Reynolds appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit, in and for Leon County, validating bonds proposed to be issued by the Florida Development Finance Corporation (FDFC), a public body corporate and politic in the State of Florida. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(2), Fla. Const. The purpo

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC14-1603 ____________ FLORIDA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellant, vs. FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellees. ____________ No. SC14-

[1] An appeal by Wanda Long Heard and Juanita Long Vick from an order entered by the district court in the matter of the estate of M.L. Long. [2] In this action there are two purported wills, two petitions for probate, two will contests, and two groups of relatives aligned against each other. We will refer to one group as the "proponents" and the other as the "contestants." Mr. Long's survivors are: "PROPONENTS": Imogene Long (widow) Tara Long Mitche

Luke, J. 1. Where a conspiracy is shown, the act of one becomes the act of all, in so far as the furtherance of the conspiracy is concerned; and each is as fully responsible for the acts of the others in carrying out the common purpose as if he himself had committed the acts. Penal Code (1910), § 1025; Horton v. State, 66 Ga. 690; Byrd v. State, 68 Ga. 661 (1) ; Handley <