Cases

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Luis Posada-Guevara has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Posa-da-Guevara has filed a response.- We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rele

ORDER KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered Defendant Luis Posada Carriles’ “Motion Requesting Issuance of Subpoenas Duces Tecum for Relevant Records from Ann Louise Bardaeh, Larry Rohter and The New York Times Regarding Interview of Defendant” (“Motion”). For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND

486 F.Supp.2d 599 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Luis Posada CARRILES. No. EP-07-CR-00087-KC. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. May 8, 2007. *600 David B. Deitch, John Williams Van-Lonkhuyzen, Paul Edward Ahern, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney,

ORDER REGARDING REDACTION OF NATURALIZATION INTERVIEW TAPES AND TRANSCRIPTS KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered the government’s “Submission and Motion Regarding Recordings and Transcripts of Defendant’s Naturalization Interview and Removal Proceedings” (“Government’s Motion”) and “Submission of the United States Regarding Fifth Amendment Issues Raised in Defenda

481 F.Supp.2d 792 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Luis POSADA CARRILES. No. EP-07-CR-00087-KC. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. April 6, 2007. David B. Deitch, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for United States of America. ORDER CARDONE, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered "

541 F.3d 344 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luis POSADA CARRILES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 07-50737. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 14, 2008. *346 John F. DePue (argued), John W. Van Lonkhuyzen, Paul Edward Ahern, U.S. *347 Dept. of Justice, Nat.

654 F.Supp.2d 557 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis Posada CARRILES, Defendant. No. EP-07-CV-87-KC. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. August 25, 2009. *561 David B. Deitch, John Williams Vanlonkhuyzen, Paul Edward Ahern, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Joseph H. Gay, Jr., As

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL LUIS ESPINET GARCÍA APELACIÓN procedente del Apelado Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Carolina v.

MEMORANDUM ** Luis Alberto Medina Posada, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief *871under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

MEMORANDUM ** Luis Alberto Medina Posada, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief *871under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), rendered January 28, 1985, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 97-1065 IVAN RUIZ, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. POSADAS DE SAN JUAN ASSOCIATES, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 97-1065 IVAN RUIZ, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. POSADAS DE SAN JUAN ASSOCIATES,

NUMBER 13-22-00172-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JOSE LUIS ROBLES A/K/A JOSE ROBLES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 103rd District Co

*347 B.D. PARKER, JR., Circuit Judge.. Luis Agudelo appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern ■ District of New York (Richard Owen, /.), sentencing him principally to 97 months’ imprisonment after a jury found him guilty on heroin-related charges. See

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review the BIA’s ruling on a motion to reopen or reconsider for abuse of discretion. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008). A review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioner

CHARLES R. SCOTT, District Judge: Following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, appellants Arturo Posada, Luis Romero and Ray Vera were each convicted of conspiracy to distribute quaaludes in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, possession with intent to distribute quaaludes in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and distribu

MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioners’ motion to reopen removal proceedings. We review the BIA’s ruling on a motion to reopen or reconsider for abuse of discretion. Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008). A review of the administrative record demonstrates that petitioner

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL XI BANCO POPULAR DE Certiorari PUERTO RICO Procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Peticionaria Sala de GUAYNABO TA2026CE00489 v.

WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Estrada-Posadas (Estrada) petitions for review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board). The Board dismissed Estrada’s appeal, affirming an immigration judge’s order of deportation and denial of voluntary departure. Estrada claims that she qualifies for refugee status due to a well-founded fear of persecution, and thus is entitled to re