Cases

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT THE MEADOWS OF MIRAMAR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, NO. 1, INC., a Florida non-profit corporation, Appellant, v. LUIS M. RODRIGUEZ and UNKNOWN TENANT, Appellees. No. 4D13-3206 [January 21, 2015] Appeal from the Circu

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 15, 2014 LUIS RODRIGUEZ v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2008-A-415 Cheryl Blackburn, Judge No. M2013-01723-CCA-R3-HC - Filed February 13, 2014 The Petitioner, Luis Rodriguez, appeals the Davidson County Criminal Court’s summary dismis

FILE COPY M A N D A T E TO THE 93RD DISTRICT COURT of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 20th day of November, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between Martina D. Rodriguez, Appellant, v. Lui

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13-14-00273-CV Martina D. Rodriguez v. Luis Antonio Pimentel and Petronila M. Pimentel On Appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas Trial Cause No. C-2785-07-B JUDGMENT

NUMBER 13-14-00273-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MARTINA D. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. LUIS ANTONIO PIMENTEL AND PETRONILA M. PIMENTEL, Appellees. On appeal from the 93nd District Court of

En el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico Dr. Luis M. Rodríguez Mora, et al. Demandante-Peticionario Certiorari V. 98TSPR169 Dr. José Arturo García Lloréns, et al. Demandados-Recurridos Número del Caso: CC-97-509 Cons. CC-97-536 Abogados de la Parte Peticionaria: Lic. Bamily López Ortiz Lic. Mirta E. Rodríguez Mora Abogados de la Parte Recurrida: Lic. Nereida Melénd

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE § COMPANY, SUNSETS WEST, INC., and No. 08-15-00173-CV R.M. PERSONNEL, INC. § Appeal from the Appellants, §

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE § COMPANY, SUNSETS WEST, INC., and No. 08-15-00173-CV R.M. PERSONNEL, INC. § Appeal from the Appellants,

MESKILL, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Luis Rodriguez was convicted following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Ross, J., of possession with intent to distribute heroin and conspiracy to distribute heroin. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. Rodriguez now moves for a new trial arguing,

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § New Hampshire Insurance Company, § No. 08-15-00173-CV Sunsets West, Inc. and R. M. Personnel, Inc., § Appeal from the Appellants, § County Court at Law No. 3 v.

PER CURIAM. *239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264

PER CURIAM. *239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264

In re Rodriquez, Luis M.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. J, No. 671-137; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 11-CA-589. Denied.

BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Luis Manuel Rodriguez-Lara (“Rodriguez”), an alien convicted of reentry after deportation, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to appoint an expert to assist him in pursuing his equal protection and fair cross-section challenges to the composition of the jury pool in the Fresno Division of the Eastern District o

JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge. |2The plaintiff, Luis Rodriguez, has appealed a judgment of the trial court granting Progressive Security Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment and denying plaintiffs counter motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 25, 2008, plaintiff was injured in a two-vehicle accident

OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice. Luis Raul Camacho, acting pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his theft liability suit against a prison official under Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code. In his sole issue, Camacho contends that the trial court

ORDER JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge. BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 32) and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. 33). Upon consideration, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.

SELYA, Circuit Judge. We confront today a script that has become all too familiar in Puerto Rico: employees of a government agency decry as political discrimination adverse employment actions taken in the wake of an election that produced a regime change. The court below ruled, among other things, that the complaint failed to state a claim for relief because it did not assert fact

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Saar v. Wellesley at Lake Clarke Shores Homeowners Ass’n, 68 So.3d 417 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (reversing foreclosure judgment where the claim of lien overstated the amount due). WARNER, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant Sergio Donato Guzman-Ferreiras (“Guzman”) appeals the order of the district court entered July 21, 2016, denying his petition for a writ of error corara nobis vacating his conviction. Guzman’s petition arose from his March 19, 2004, judgment of conviction upon his guilty plea to transportation of illegal aliens within the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(A)(ii).