Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 21, 2024 No. 04-23-00334-CR IN RE CERVANTES, et al. Original Proceeding 1 ORDER 1 This proceeding arises out of eighty-five civil bond fo

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00334-CR IN RE CERVANTES, et al. Original Proceeding 1 1 This proceeding arises out of eighty-five civil bond forfeiture cases involving the State of Texas and the following defend

NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion

MANION, Circuit Judge. Gustavo Nunez-Moron, a citizen of Mexico, sought cancellation of removal, waiver of inadmissibility, and adjustment of status based on alien-relative petitions from his wife, a United States citizen, and his father, a legal permanent resident. Concluding that Nunez was inadmissible because he had re-entered the United States after previously being removed, t

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2023 TSPR 9 Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus Inactivo de octubre de 2020 a 211 DPR ___ diciembre de 2022 Número del Caso: EM-2023-1 Fecha: 31 de enero de 2023 Materia: Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus Inactivo de octubre de 2020 a diciembre de 2022. Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del proceso de compilación y pub

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus 2020 TSPR 145 Inactivo de marzo 2019 a agosto 2020 205 DPR _____ Número del Caso: EM-2020-18 Fecha: 30 de noviembre de 2020 Materia: Resolución del Tribunal. Este documento constituye un documento oficial del Tribunal Supremo que está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del proceso de compilación y public

519 F.Supp.2d 201 (2007) Inés CORUJO-MARTI, Plaintiff, v. TRIPLE-S, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 05-2070 (ADC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 27, 2007. *202 *203 Enrique J. Mendoza-Mendez, Mendoza Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Pedro J. Manzano-Yates, E

390 F.Supp.2d 94 (2005) Alcides Roman ROMAN, et al., Plaintiffs v. Carlos O. DELGADO ALTIERI, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 01-1544 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 5, 2005. *95 *96 *97 *98

CORRECTED OPINION KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: The eight appellants in this case were convicted on both counts of a two-count indictment charging them with (Count I) violating 21 U.S.C. § 955c by conspiring with each other and with persons unknown to possess with intent to distribute marijuana while aboard a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 955a(a), and (Coun

Opinión disidente emitida por el Juez Asociado Señor Co-rrada del Río. Que consideramos factores determinantes en nuestra vida la ciudadanía de los Estados Unidos de América y la aspiración a continuamente enriquecer nuestro acervo democrático en el disfrute individual y colectivo de sus derechos y prerrogativas; la lealtad a los postulados de la Constitución Federal', la convi-vencia e

ORDER ON TRUSTEES CORPS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Docs.6, 7.) LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Defendant MTC Financial, Inc. dba Trustee Corps (“Trustee Corps”) seeks to dismiss plaintiff Maria De Jesus Cisneros (“Ms. Cisneros’ ”) home loan and default claims on grounds, among others, that Trustee Corps is not subject to Ms. Cisneros’ claims in its limited role as

794 F.2d 1503 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Julio VIDAL-HUNGRIA, Jader Meza-Castillo, Jose Castro-Lahoz,Alberto Robinson-Vasquez, Alfonso Galvis-Diaz,Angel Ferreira-Navas, EnriqueAaron-Pinto, JacintoAlava-Solano,Defendants-Appellants. No. 85-5079. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 25, 1986.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

Mr. Justice Wolf delivered the opinion of the court.' This is a case in which little or nothing was' done in the; court below to simplify the issues. Por one reason or another ’ not fully explained, the appellants were allowed to include hi" the complaint a number of irrelevant and impertinent matter^,"' some of them having no apparent relation to the alleged' causes of action. The fundamental theory of the compl

Mr. Chief Justice Hernández delivered the opinion of the court. *15By a public deed executed before Notary Manuel F. Bossy on August 18, 1909, in .the city of San Juan, Ramón Wolff Aboy and Gustavo Mourraille, the latter in his own. right and as manager of the Puerto Beal Central of which he, Ms mother, Nancy Nerón Longpré, and his brother and sisters Mati

El Juez Peesidente Sb. HeRnáudez emitió la opinión del tribunal. Por escritura pública otorgada en esta ciudad de San Juan a 18 de agosto de 1909 ante el Notario don Manuel F. Rossy, Ramón Wolff Aboy y Gustavo Mourraille, éste último por sí' y como administrador de la Central Puerto Real de que era dueño en unión de su madre Nancy Nerón Longpré y de sus, hermanos Matilde, Amada, Emilia y Víctor Mourraille, ce-l

El Juez Asociado Se. Wole, emitió la opinión del tribunal. Este es nn caso en el cnal poco o nada se hizo en la corte inferior por simplificar las cuestiones en controversia. Por una n otra razón que no aparece enteramente explicada, se permitió a los apelantes incluir en la demanda un gran nú-mero de cuestiones que son innecesarias e impertinentes, algu-úas de las cuales no tienen al parecer ninguna relación con

Me. Justice del Toeo delivered the opinion of the court. Teresa Capó Vázquez, widow of Rivera, filed a complaint in the District Court of Guayama • praying the court to adjudge the plaintiff to he the owner of a joint interest of 8.77 acres of land in a property of 104 acres, the remainder of *657a property of greater area which is described. The complain

El Juez Asociado Sr. del Toro, emitió la opinión -del tribunal. Doña Teresa Capó Vázquez, viuda de Rivera, entabló de-manda en la Corte de Distrito de Gruayama pidiendo a la corte qne declarara qne la demandante tenía derecho a nn condominio sobre ciento cuatro cnerdas de terreno, resto de una finca mayor que se describe, equivalente a ocho cnerdas setenta y siete centésimas de otra. La demanda fue excep-ciona

*105SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from the opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, J.), vacating the Injunctions against Argentina upon the occurrence of two conditions precedent. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case and therefore addre