Cases

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 51 The People &c., Appellant, v. Luis A. Rodriguez, Respondent. William H. Branigan, for appellant. Samuel Barr, for respondent. The Legal Aid Society, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM. Luis Rodriguez appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. Although Rodriguez raises several issues on appeal, only one merits discussion. Rodriguez argues that the trial court erred in summarily denying ground two of his motion, wherein he alleged that his counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him that his sentence potentially violated do

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-12-00629-CV Luis A. URIBE, Appellant v. Sara Rodriguez URIBE, Appellee From

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00629-CV Luis A. URIBE, Appellant v. Sara Rodriguez Sara Rodrigu

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00628-CV Luis A. URIBE, Appellant v. Sara Rodriguez URIBE, Appellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 26, 2013 No. 04-12-00628-CV Luis A. URIBE, Appellant v. Sara Rodriguez URIBE, Appellee From the

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA LUIS RODRIGUEZ, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D14-1297 SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATIONS AND SEDGWICK CMS, Appellees. _____________________________/ Op

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00908-CV Luis Alfonso Lara RODRIGUEZ, Judith A. Gomez, and All Other Occupants, Appellants v. Marina SANCHEZ,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 22, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-563 Lower Tribunal No. 14-17706 ________________ American Sales and Management Organization LLC d/b/a Eulen America,

PER CURIAM: Luis Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income (collectively, “disability benefits”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). On appeal, Rodriguez argues that the ALJ erred in determining, at step three of the sequential evaluation, that his mental impairments did not meet

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Same case below, 612 F.3d 1049.

Broderick, C.J. The defendant, Luis A. Rodriguez, appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Vaughan, J.) denying his motion to suppress evidence of his possession of controlled drugs, discovered as a result of a warrantless entry by the police into his hotel room. We affirm. *102I

*657OPINION OF THE COURT Robert E. Torres, J. In this foreclosure action, the defendant Jorge Luis Rodriguez seeks an order, pursuant to CPLR 3408 and Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 NYCRR) § 202.12, finding that the plaintiff U.S. Bank, N.A. (US Bank), and its loan servicer, Wells Fargo Bank (Wells Fargo), violated their duty to negotiate in good

612 F.3d 1049 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Luis A. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant. No. 09-2347. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 15, 2010. Filed: July 22, 2010. *1050 Christopher P. Keleher, Querrey & Harrow, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued, for appellant. David A. Ba

OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court is defendants Carmen G. Rodriguez-Diaz’s (“Rodriguez-Diaz”), Cesar E. Caminero-Ramos’ (“CamineroRamos”), Hector R. Malave-Rodriguez’s (“Malave-Rodriguez”), and Pedro Vazquez-Montañez’s (“Vazquez-Montañez”) motion to dismiss the case on Eleventh Amendment and qualified immunity grounds, and for failure to state a claim. (Docket No. 9.) For the reaso

PER CURIAM. *239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264

PER CURIAM. *239Affirmed. Concluding that the trial court did not grossly abuse its discretion when it vacated the default and default final judgment, we affirm. See Kathleen G. Kozinski, P.A. v. Phillips, 126 So.3d 1264

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR BOND AND DENYING MOTION FOR HEARING PATRICIA A. SEITZ, District Judge. This case involves a failed series of concerts in Argentina involving Daddy Yankee, a multiple Grammy award-winning singer of Reggaeton music. Plaintiffs entered into two contracts to promote and produce ten Daddy Yankee concerts scheduled for November o

*1259ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

OPINION AND ORDER PEDRO A. DELGADO-HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 26). For the reasons explained below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 14, 2011, plaintiff Luis A. Ayala-Colón Sucres., Inc. (“AYACOL”) filed a complaint in admiralty against defenda