Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Lucas v. United States Department of Education”
United States v. Lucaspublic domain
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Defendant Richard Lucas ("Defendant") stands accused by way of a one-count Indictment returned on July 11, 2017, with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute 5 kilograms or more of cocaine, in violation of
Lucas v. Spellingspublic domain
408 F.Supp.2d 27 (2006) Theodore R. LUCAS, Plaintiff, v. Margaret SPELLINGS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education. Defendant. Civ.A. No. 01-2393 JMF. United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 10, 2006. *28 John F. Karl, Jr., Karl & Tarone, Stephen C. Leckar, Butera & Andrews, Washington, DC, for Plain
Lucas v. Paigepublic domain
435 F.Supp.2d 165 (2006) Theodore R. LUCAS, Plaintiff, v. Rod PAIGE, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, Defendant. Civil Action No. 01-2393 (JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 14, 2006. *166 John F. Karl, Jr., Karl & Tarone, Stephen C. Leckar, Butera & Andrews,
United States v. Lucaspublic domain
670 F.3d 784 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Trevor LUCAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-1512. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 20, 2011. Decided February 29, 2012. *786 Rita M. Rumbelow (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Madison, WI, for
United States v. Lucaspublic domain
640 F.3d 168 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander LUCAS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-6035, 09-6061. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: December 8, 2010. Decided and Filed: May 11, 2011. *169 ARGUED: Monica L. Thompson, DLA Piper LLC (US), Chicago, Illinois, for Ap
Taylor v. Lucaspublic domain
[Cite as Taylor v. Lucas, 2025-Ohio-2840.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Asia Taylor, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 24AP-472 (M.C. No. 2023 CVG 33857) v. : Brandy Lucas, :
Lucas v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHARON LUCAS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-00143 (TFH) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Sharon Lucas’ Partial Motion for Summary
United States v. Lucaspublic domain
817 F.Supp.2d 151 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, v. Jon LUCAS and Lamar Richardson, Defendants. No. 08-CR-6264 CJS. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 24, 2010. *154 Charles E. Moynihan, U.S. Attorney's Office, Rochester, NY, for United States of America. Robert G. Smith, Federal Public Defender, Maurice J.
390 F.Supp. 1310 (1975) Ruby M. LUCAS, and Darin E. Lucas, infant minors, by their mother and next friend Belmira Lucas v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, United States of America, Civ. A. No. 4845. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. February 25, 1975. *1311 Thomas W. Pearlman, Providence, R. I
State v. Lucaspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-714 No. COA21-685 Filed 1 November 2022 Macon County, No. 18 CRS 000493 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DANIEL LUCAS, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 2 February 2021 by Judge William H. Coward in Macon County Superior Court. Heard in the Cour
State v. Lucaspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-714 No. COA21-685 Filed 1 November 2022 Macon County, No. 18 CRS 000493 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DANIEL LUCAS, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 2 February 2021 by Judge William H. Coward in Macon County Superior Court. Heard in the Cour
State v. Lucaspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCCOA-714 No. COA21-685 Filed 1 November 2022 Macon County, No. 18 CRS 000493 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DANIEL LUCAS, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 2 February 2021 by Judge William H. Coward in Macon County Superior Court. Heard in the Cour
In Re Guardianship of Lucas Moreales Velasquezpublic domain
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In re VELASQUEZ, Minor. MARIO VELASQUEZ-TOMAS, Guardian of LMV FOR PUBLICATION November 10, 2022 Appellant.
Windsor v. United Statespublic domain
DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Edith Windsor sued as surviving spouse of a same-sex couple that was married in Canada in 2007 and was resident in New York at the time of her spouse’s death in 2009. Windsor was denied the benefit of the spousal deduction for federal estate taxes under 26 U.S.C. § 2056(A) solely because Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), 1 U.S.C. § 7, defines the words “marriage” and “sp
Davidson v. United States Department of Statepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge Granting Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to test sufficiency of ANSWER I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Mr. Lawrence U. Davidson, III, pro se,
State v. Lucaspublic domain
[Cite as State v. Lucas, 2020-Ohio-1602.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108436 v. : CHARLES LUCAS, :
In Re Lucas H.public domain
05/26/2021 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 19, 2021 Session IN RE LUCAS H. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004555-18 James F. Russell, Judge ___________________________________
Lucas v. District of Columbiapublic domain
*178 MEMORANDUM OPINION Thomas F. Hogan, Senior United States District Judge Allan Earl Lucas, Jr. (the “plaintiff’) commenced this federal lawsuit against the District of Columbia (the “defendant”) to recover money damages for lost earnings and retirement benefits ste
Commonwealth v. Lucaspublic domain
Cordy, J. This case concerns the constitutionality of G. L. c. 56, § 42 (§ 42), which criminalizes certain false statements about political candidates or questions submitted to voters. 1 Melissa Lucas was charged with violating the statute after her political action committee p
*305 MEMORANDUM JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge. Plaintiffs Stanley and Marisol Laskowski initiated this action against the United States of America Department of Veterans Affairs for damages pursuant to the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq. The plaintiffs allege medical malpractice against the medical professiona