⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lucas v. Credit Corp Solution, Inc.”

District Court, N.D. California · 2018-04-18 · Published · cited 14× · 307 F. Supp. 3d 993
In May 2017, Dr. Shinn and Adam Kim say they met with an attorney to discuss opening a fraud investigation into Green Life Solar's conduct. (Shinn Decl., ¶¶ 24-25, Ex. P; Kim Decl. ¶¶ 7-8). That attorney asked the Monmouth County, New Jersey prosecutor to investigate the matter, and defendants say that the prosecutor's investigation is still pending. (Shinn Decl. ¶ 25, Ex. P; Kim Decl. ¶ 8). Shortly after, TCC wrote defendants to advise tha
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014-09-17 · Published · cited 5× · 68 F. Supp. 3d 870; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 129899; 98 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,157; 2014 WL 4637193
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN J. THARP, Jr., United States ■ District Judge In this proposed class action, five African American laborers allege that defendant Vee Pak, Inc., a manufacturing and packaging business, directly and through its relationships with the three defendant temporary employment agencies, discriminates against African American temporary workers, largely in favor of Latin
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-02-22 · Published · cited 0×
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-15406 FEB 22, 2012 JOHN LEY
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2018-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 588 B.R. 798
John P. Gustafson, United States Bankruptcy Judge This Adversary Proceeding is before the court on Plaintiff-Trustee Scott E. Eisenberg's ("Plaintiff-Trustee") Motion for Summary Judgment [Adv. Doc. # 28]1 , Defendant Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority's ("Defendant" or "Port Authority") Motion for Summary Judgment [Adv. Doc. # 29], Defendant's Opposition Reply to Trustee's Motion [Adv. Doc. # 32], and
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-07-03 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 16, 2013 Session COPPER BASIN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ET AL. v. FISERV SOLUTIONS, INC., d/b/a INTEGRASYS Appeal from the Chancery Court for Polk County No. 2011-CV-26 Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor No. E2012-02145-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 3, 2013 This action sounding in negligence and breach o
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-08-11 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0218p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ TINA ZAI, individually and as a Trustee of her │
District Court, C.D. California · 2016-08-02 · Published · cited 1× · 198 F. Supp. 3d 1089; 2016 WL 4150756; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105198
Proceedings: Order: (1) DENYING Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, a New Trial on Induced Infringement, (Doc. No. 692); (2) FINDING the Equitable Defenses of Implied License and Laches Do Not Bar Plaintiffs Claims, (Doc. Nos. 654, 698); and (3) GRANTING IN PART Plaintiffs Motion for Entry of Judgment, an Award of Supplemental Damages, an Accounting of Infringing Sales, and Pre-Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest, (
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014-10-27 · Published · cited 1× · 2014 IL App (2d) 131058; 2014 WL 4460496
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Pace Communications Services Corp. v. Express Products, Inc., 2014 IL App (2d) 131058 Appellate Court PACE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES CORPORATION and Caption TUNICA PHARMACY, INC., Individually and as the Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-03-30 · Published · cited 3× · 247 F. Supp. 3d 356; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47998
*359OPINION & ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, a group of individuals, companies, credit unions, and trade associations affiliated with New York City’s medallion taxicab Industry, bring this action against the City of New York (the ‘“City”), the New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission (the “TLC”), and TLC Chai
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023-10-20 · Published · cited 2× · 226 N.E.3d 1073; 2023 Ohio 3807
[Cite as GigSmart, Inc. v. AxleHire, Inc., 2023-Ohio-3807.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO GIGSMART, INC., : APPEAL NO. C-230109 TRIAL NO. A-2201795 Plaintiff-Appellee, : : O P I N
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005-06-24 · Published · cited 31× · 922 So. 2d 61; 2005 WL 1492205
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 63 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 64 Bentley Systems, Incorporated ("Bentley Systems"), and Bentley Systems Europe B.V. ("Bentley Systems Europe") (hereinafter
District Court, C.D. California · 2004-06-22 · Published · cited 26× · 227 F.R.D. 313; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28031; 2004 WL 3314567
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MORROW, District Judge. Plaintiff commenced this contract action on November 11, 2002, naming MGA Electronics, Inc., and Roger T. Featherston as defendants. After MGA filed for bankruptcy, the court granted plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint that asserted claims against Roger A. Featherston, MGA Midwest, LLC, RTF Associates, LLC, and Chandle
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003-12-31 · Published · cited 17× · 802 N.E.2d 1228; 345 Ill. App. 3d 645; 280 Ill. Dec. 707; 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 1593
802 N.E.2d 1228 (2003) 345 Ill. App.3d 645 280 Ill.Dec. 707 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. INDEPENDENT MACHINE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant. No. 1-02-2163. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. December 31, 2003.
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-02-26 · Published · cited 4× · 237 N.E.3d 274; 2024 Ohio 698
[Cite as Universal Steel Bldgs. Corp. v. Dues, 2024-Ohio-698.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY UNIVERSAL STEEL BUILDINGS CORP., DBA OLYMPIA STEEL BUILDINGS CORPORATION, CASE NO. 10-22-07 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT, v. DANIEL DUES, ET AL., OPIN
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003-12-31 · Published · cited 0×
FOURTH DIVISION December 31, 2003 No. 1-02-2163 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC., ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, ) Cook County. )
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024-03-07 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 18-CV-1257 & 19-CV-0064 NICHOLAS ANTHONY CZAJKA, APPELLANT, v. HOLT GRAPHIC
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 379 F. Supp. 3d 1191
MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1194In this employment action, plaintiff Robert Collier, Jr. contends that his former employer, Harland Clarke Corp., terminated his employment and retaliated against him because of his age and disability in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.§ 621 et seq
District Court, S.D. New York · 2002-05-10 · Published · cited 13× · 201 F. Supp. 2d 236; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8411; 2002 WL 959574
201 F.Supp.2d 236 (2002) GENEVA PHARMACEUTICALS TECHNOLOGY CORP., (as successor in interest to Invamed, Inc.), Plaintiff, v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC., Brantford Chemicals Inc., Bernard C. Sherman, Apotex Holdings Inc., Apotex Inc. and Sherman Delaware, Inc., Defendants Apothecon, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., Brantford Chemicals Inc., Bernard C. Sherman, Apotex Holdings Inc., Apotex Inc. and Sherman Delaware, Inc., Defen
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2018-12-04 · Published · cited 10× · 594 B.R. 442
R. KIMBALL MOSIER, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge General Aeronautics Corporation and other related companies have tried to build and market gyroplanes for over 30 years, but business has not been easy. Funding shortfalls have been common, and the company could not afford to pay employees their full compensation for significant stretches of time. When the last shortfall hit in early 2015, many of its remaining employees resigned or were laid
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-07-28 · Published · cited 15× · 267 F. Supp. 3d 174
MEMORANDUM OPINION KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Named Plaintiffs Vernon Ross and Debra Josey (“Plaintiffs") allege that Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”) has “engaged in a pattern or practice of employment discrimination” that is “manifest[] in Lockheed Martin’s performance appraisal system.” (Compl., ECF No. 1, ¶ 11.) According to Ross and Josey, Lockheed’s annual emp