Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Lucas v. Baca”
Lucas v. Breg, Inc.public domain
ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [ECF Nos. 55, 76] Hon. Cynthia Bashant, United States District Judge This case arises out of alleged misrepresentations and omissions made by Defendant Breg in connection with the marketing and sale o
Cordova v. Bacapublic domain
OPINION KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: We must evaluate under AEDPA a state court’s decision to apply harmless error review where a criminal defendant was not represented by counsel at trial, following a defective waiver of his right to counsel. Facts Petitioner Henry Cordova was arrested outside his home after an altercation involving his neighbors. He was handcuffed by
Cordova v. Bacapublic domain
346 F.3d 924 Henry Lee CORDOVA, Petitioner-Appellee,v.Leroy BACA, Sheriff of Los Angeles County; Deanne Myers, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge; Steven Cooley, Los Angeles District Attorney; Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of California, Respondents-Appellants. No. 02-55713. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 14, 2003 — P
Lucas v. Mississippi Housing Authority No. 8public domain
441 So.2d 101 (1983) Annette LUCAS, et al. v. MISS. HOUSING AUTHORITY # 8. No. 53752. Supreme Court of Mississippi. July 27, 1983. Rehearing Denied December 14, 1983. *102 Richard W. Hamilton, Rex Gordon, Sr., Gordon, Myers & Gordon, Pascagoula, for appellant. Roger T. Clark, Gulfport, Joe R. Colingo,
United States v. Bacapublic domain
Opinion of the Court FERGUSON, Judge: Tried by special court-mai’tial, the accused was found guilty of absence without leave, leaving his post without being properly relieved, and larceny, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Articles 86, 113, and 121, 10 USC §§ 886, 913, and 921, respectively. He was sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of $55.00 per month for six months, and confinem
C'De Baca v. Commissionerpublic domain
OPINION. Black, Judge; The Commissioner has determined deficiencies in income tas and additions to tax for the years 1953 and 1954, as follows: [[Image here]] [[Image here]] The deficiency for 1953 is due to the following adjustment: Adjustme
Slesarik v. Luna Countypublic domain
13 F.3d 406 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Ken
State v. Mantellipublic domain
42 P.3d 272 (2002) 131 N.M. 692 2002-NMCA-033 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Lucas MANTELLI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 21,464. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. January 29, 2002. Certiorari Denied March 7, 2002. *273 Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney Gen
State v. Rotherhampublic domain
OPINION BACA Justice. At issue on appeal is the constitutionality of New Mexico’s Mental Illness and Competency Code, NMSA1978, §§ 31-9-1 to -1.5 (Cum.Supp.1995) (hereinafter “the NMMIC”), which provides the procedure to be followed in cases where a criminal defendant is incompetent to stand trial. ■ Appellants, Christopher Rotherham, Lucille Epperson, Richard Lopez, and C
Martinez v. Harperpublic domain
802 P.2d 1185 (1990) Lucas MARTINEZ, individually and as an heir-at-law, and as the personal representative of the Estate of Faustin Martinez, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James D. HARPER, individually and as a Colorado State Patrolman; Robert Copley, individually and as Trooper Commander; John N. Dempsey, individually and as Chief of the Colorado State Patrol; and David J. Thomas individually and as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Pu
Elston v. City of Turlockpublic domain
38 Cal.3d 227 (1985) 695 P.2d 713 211 Cal. Rptr. 416 ROBERT C. ELSTON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF TURLOCK et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. S.F. 24678. Supreme Court of California. March 4, 1985. *230 COUNSEL Canelo, Hansen & Wilson, James H
Yates Exploration, Inc. v. Valley Improvement Ass'npublic domain
773 P.2d 350 (1989) 108 N.M. 405 YATES EXPLORATION, INC., a New Mexico corporation, Cibola Energy Corporation, a New Mexico corporation, OTEC, a California corporation, Lynn Lucas, Thomas N. Jones, Roger V. Eaton, Charles M. Saggio, Amy N. Saggio, Raymond L. Surrette, Agnes A. Surrette, Raymond L. Surrette, Jr., and May T. Missec, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. VALLEY IMPROVEMENT
Ronquillo v. Peoplepublic domain
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS COLORADO SUPREME COURT MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2017 "Slip opinions" are the opinions delivered by the Supreme Court Justices and are subject to modification, rehearing, withdrawal, or clerical corrections. Modifications to previously posted opinions will be linked to the case number in the petition for rehearing section the day the changes are announced. Click on the case number to
Hudson v. County of Los Angelespublic domain
Opinion CHANEY, Acting P. J. A former deputy in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, while on temporary disability leave resulting from knee injuries, was discharged from her employment on grounds later found by the county civil service commission to be unjustified. During the long civil service commissio
Neal v. Director, D.C. Department of Correctionspublic domain
400 F.Supp.2d 134 (2005) Besseye NEAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DIRECTOR, D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-2420 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 22, 2005. *135 Ted Justice Williams, Avis E. Buchanan, DC, Public Defender Service, Jeffrey Fred Liss, Mary Elizab
Spirit of Aloha Temple v. County of Mauipublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SPIRIT OF ALOHA TEMPLE, a No. 23-3453 Hawai‘i nonprofit corporation; D.C. No. FREDRICK R. HONIG, 1:14-cv-00535- SOM-WRP Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. OPINION COUNTY OF MAUI; STATE OF HAWAI‘I, Defendants - Appe
Sonny Penix v. Parra (In re Parra)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT H. JACOBVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court following a trial on the merits of this adversary proceeding to determine the dis-chargeability of certain debt owing to Plaintiff Sonny Penix (“Plaintiff’ or Mr. Penix) that arose during the course of an oral agreement between Defendant Ruben Parra (“Defendant” or Mr. Parra) and Mr. Penix regarding the sale
State of West Virginia v. Keith Allen Woodpublic domain
FILED April 10, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WE
Ulibarri v. Southland Royalty Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. BRACK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Dispositive Questions of Law to the New Mexico Supreme Court, filed on May 2, 2016 (Doc. 15). Having considered the submissions of counsel and relevant law, the Court will DENY Plaintiffs motion. I. Background This putative
Oakes v. Thurgood Marshall Academypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRIDGET OAKES et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:20-cv-02754-DLF THURGOOD MARSHALL ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Bridget Oakes brings this case under the Individuals with Disabili