Cases

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions Concurs Concurs

DISSENTING OPINION BY FREEDBERG, J.: Appellant, Yvonne A. Love (“Wife”), appeals from the support order entered by the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas against Appellee, James C. Love *1280(“Husband”). Wife asks us to determine whether the trial court erred by refusing to enforce the terms of an Affidavit of Support that Husband filed with

74 So.3d 928 (2011) Aaron LOVE, Appellant v. Jennifer Lynn LOVE, Appellee. No. 2010-CA-00450-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. November 15, 2011. *930 Rabun Jones, Greenville, attorney for appellant. J. Mack Varner, Vicksburg, Penny B. Lawson, attorneys for appellee. Before IRVING, P.J., MAXWELL and RUSSELL, JJ.

367 S.C. 493 (2006) 626 S.E.2d 56 Miller L. LOVE, Jr., Respondent, v. Ann B. LOVE, Appellant. No. 4077. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard December 7, 2005. Decided January 23, 2006. *494 Evander G. Jeffords, of Florence, and John S. Nichols, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Mi

On October 5, 2001, the trial court entered a judgment divorcing Monica R. Love ("the wife") and Frederick Love ("the husband"). Among other things, that judgment awarded the wife one-half of the husband's "Southern Company Companion Stock." Testimony at the divorce hearing indicated that the husband owned some "Southern Company Common Stock" and that he had an interest in the "Southern Company Employee Savings Plan." The wife filed a postjudgment motion to alter, amend, or vacate the

—In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4 (1) the mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Dounias, J.), entered March 28, 2002, as denied her objections to an order of the same court (Goglas, H.E.), entered February 28, 2001, which, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition for an upward modification of her child support obligation, and (2) the father cross-appeals, as limited by his brief, fro

75 S.W.3d 747 (2002) Kimberly S. LOVE, Appellant, v. Karl David LOVE, Respondent. No. WD 59268. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 5, 2002. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied April 30, 2002. Application for Transfer Denied June 25, 2002. *749 B. Allen Heeke, Jr., for appe

72 S.W.3d 167 (2002) Helene Beth LOVE, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Phillip Robert LOVE, Respondent-Appellant. No. 24290. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. March 27, 2002. *168 Richard D. Bender, Springfield, for Appellant. No appearance for Respondent. *169

PER CURIAM. Some 17 years after the parties’ divorce had become final, the former wife sought to modify the final judgment of dissolution of marriage for the purpose of addressing for the first time equitable distribution of the former husband’s military retirement benefits. Despite the former husband’s argument that the request was barred by the doctrine of res judicata, the trial court granted the petition for modification

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered February 13, 1997, the de*632fendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), entered September 12, 1997, as, after a nonjury trial, directed him to pay maintenance to the plaintiff for a period of eight years: $4,200 per month for four years commencing July 1, 1997, and ending

Springer, C. J., concurring in part and dissenting in part: I agree that res judicata does not bar Mr. Love from denying paternity; however, I dissent from this court’s requiring him to pay child support and tuition under the circumstances of this case.

687 So.2d 1229 (1997) Dianne J. LOVE v. Randy S. LOVE. No. 94-CA-01152-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. February 6, 1997. *1230 Don A. Mitchell, Jackson, for Appellant. Jessie L. Evans, Blackmon Blackmon & Evans, Canton, for Appellee. Before SULLIVAN, P.J., and McRAE and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr., JJ. SULLI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary *740relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated January 27, 1997, which awarded the plaintiff wife maintenance, child support, and an attorney’s fee, and denied him certain credits in the calculation of an award of equitable distribution.

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cou

FILED Feb 23, 2022 10:26 AM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BARBARA J. LOVE, Appellant, v. RICHARD LOVE, Appellee. No. 4D20-1230 [August 12, 2021] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Scott S

Case: 23-1465 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 07/11/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CHARLES J. LOVE, JR., Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2023-1465 ______________________

Filed 1/13/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, B331017 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA102203) v. LAMAR LOVE, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael D. Abzug,

Case: 22-2285 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 05/03/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CHARLES J. LOVE, JR., Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2022-2285 _________

Appellate Case: 23-1397 Document: 63-1 Date Filed: 04/22/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 22, 2025