⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Love v. Godinez”

Holmes v. Godinezpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 34× · 311 F.R.D. 177; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137388; 2015 WL 5920750
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge Plaintiffs, eleven deaf or hard of hearing prisoners, brought this proposed class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Defendant Salvador A. Godinez, the Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC” or the “Department”). Plaintiffs allege that IDOC has denied them hearing accommodat
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021-08-04 · Published · cited 35× · 7 F.4th 628
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19‐3425 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. ERNESTO GODINEZ, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Evans v. Godinezpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014-12-03 · Published · cited 3× · 2014 IL App (4th) 130686
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Evans v. Godinez, 2014 IL App (4th) 130686 Appellate Court WILLIAM EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.A. GODINEZ, KEITH Caption ANGLIN, and LAMAR COLEMAN, Defendants-Appellees. District & No. Fourth District Docket No. 4-13-0686 Rule 23 Order filed June 18, 2014 Rule 23 Order with
Ambrose v. Godinezpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013-02-22 · Published · cited 39× · 510 F. App'x 470
ORDER Richard Ambrose is civilly committed under the Illinois Sexually Dangerous Persons Act, 725 ILCS 205/1.01-12. In this lawsuit he raises a number of claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law, all of which the district court (either directly or through a magistrate judge acting by consent) resolved in favor of the defendants at various points of the litigation. We affirm the judgment. Ambrose has been confined a
Love v. Yatespublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2008-11-04 · Published · cited 2× · 586 F. Supp. 2d 1155; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106946; 2008 WL 4821612
(2008) Terrell LOVE, Petitioner, v. James A. YATES, Warden, Respondent. No. C 05-3995 JSW. United States District Court, N.D. California. November 4, 2008. ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Terrell Love ("Petitioner"), a prisoner of the State of California, has fi
Hunley v. Godinezpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992-09-11 · Published · cited 10× · 975 F.2d 316; 1992 WL 218401
PER CURIAM. Maurice Hunley petitioned the district court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the grounds that he was denied a fair state court trial because of juror bias and prosecutorial misconduct. The district court granted the writ. 784 F.Supp. 522 We affirm. I. Background Lisa Tyson was fatally stabbed in her apartment on November 18, 1983. The Chicago Police
Hunley v. Godinezpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992-09-11 · Published · cited 18× · 975 F.2d 316; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21180
975 F.2d 316 Maurice HUNLEY, Petitioner-Appellee,v.Salvador GODINEZ, Warden, Stateville Correctional Center,Illinois Department of Corrections, and Roland W.Burris, Attorney General of Illinois,Respondents-Appellants. No. 92-1784. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued July 8, 1992.Decided Sept. 11, 1992.
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992-01-27 · Published · cited 2× · 784 F. Supp. 522; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 873; 1992 WL 12683
784 F.Supp. 522 (1992) UNITED STATES of America ex rel., Maurice HUNLEY, Petitioner, v. Salvadore GODINEZ, Warden, Stateville Correctional Center, Illinois Department of Corrections, and Roland W. Burris, Attorney General of Illinois, Respondents. No. 91 C 6195. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. January 27, 1992. Robert L. Graham, Bonnie B. Koch, Jen
Godinez v. Russopublic domain
New York City Family Court · 1966-01-19 · Published · cited 6× · 49 Misc. 2d 66; 266 N.Y.S.2d 636; 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2287
Morrie Slifkin, J. These are two paternity proceedings affecting the two children of the parties, the hearing upon which has been consolidated for the purposes of this decision. The respondent, Donald Eusso, has admitted paternity of both of the children, and an order of filiation is directed to be entered. The respondent, however, has filed an application with the court wherein he requests th
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-1180 _____________________________ FRANK LEIJA MORENO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Clifton Alan Drake, Judge. March 13, 2024 ROWE, J. Frank Leija Moreno ap
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 489 P.3d 524; 2020 OK 82
OSCN Found Document:STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KHUU STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KHUU2020 OK 82Case Number: SCBD-6946Decided: 10/05/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 82, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED,
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2020-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued May 7, 2020. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00301-CR ——————————— KHANCHANAT PHANKHAO, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2025-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00744-CR Marios Michael Lamnissos, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. C-1-CR-23-400444, THE HONORABLE MICHAEL KEASLER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022-06-14 · Published · cited 2× · 276 A.3d 33; 2022 ME 32
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2022 ME 32 Docket: And-21-288 Argued: May 10, 2022 Decided: June 14, 2022 Panel: MEAD, JABAR, HORTON, CONNORS, and LAWRENCE, JJ.* STATE OF MAINE v. HILLARY HEMMINGER HORTON, J. [¶1] Hillary Hemminger appeals from a judgment of conviction for op
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2019-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-17-00378-CR ___________________________ JOSHUA DAVID MCINTOSH, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 396th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1479308D Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Pittman, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018-06-14 · Published · cited 29× · 548 S.W.3d 238
OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE KELLER *241The Commonwealth seeks discretionary review of a decision affirming the Jefferson District Court Juvenile Session's finding that B.H. was incompetent to stand trial and dismissing the charges against him. The circuit court upheld, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted the Commonwealth's motion
State v. Burnspublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2019-04-18 · Published · cited 71× · 438 P.3d 1183; 193 Wash. 2d 190
JOHNSON, J. *193¶1 This case involves, first, whether Michael Burns was improperly denied his right to waive counsel and represent himself at trial and, second, whether he may assert a violation of the confrontation clause for the first time on appeal. The trial court judge denied Burns's request to proceed pro se based on a lack of understandi
State v. Cobospublic domain
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2015-05-05 · Published · cited 0×
Decisions of the Nebraska Court of Appeals STATE v. COBOS 887 Cite as 22 Neb. App. 887 otherwise proved. Thus, while the district court erred in con- cluding that inverse condemnation required an actual physical taking, it did not err in finding that there were no genuine issues of material fact, dismissing 6224 Fontenelle’s motion for summary judgment, and granting MUD’s motion for sum- mary judgment.
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2016-05-18 · Published · cited 13× · 188 F. Supp. 3d 836; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65465; 2016 WL 2893381
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REAGAN, Chief Judge. I. Introduction In July 2015, Victor Bandala-Martinez (Plaintiff) filed a pro se complaint in this Court under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against five named correctional officials and several other unknown correctional officials. The named Defendants are Nicholas Bebout, David Davis, Ryne Ellett, Frank Eovaldi, and Cory Fry. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants F
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 30 2020, 10:21 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court