Cases

Justice KETCHUM: The petitioner, Larry Myers (“Myers”), appeals from the February 25, 2014, order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County affirming the administrative decision of the respondent, Workforce West Virginia (‘Workforce”), that Myers was ineligible to receive unemployment compensation benefits for various periods between November 29, 2008, and March 17, 2012.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00548-CV Byron Harper, Appellant v. PJC Air Conditioning and Plumbing, LLC d/b/a Rabroker Air Conditioning & Plumbing, Appellee FROM THE 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 296,781-C, THE HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRES

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

Case: 11-30770 Document: 00512389958 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/27/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 27, 2013 No. 11-30770

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00297-CV Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellant// Cross-Appellants, Alan W. Alexander, Billy Davis, Joseph Randy Dillard, Ruben Du

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-05-00297-CV Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellant// Cross-Appellants, Alan W. Alexander, Billy Davis, Joseph Randy Dillard, Ruben Duran, Kenny Foster, Maria G. Garza, Gregory Haire, Bobby Harper, Eduardo Jimenez, Dennis D. Land, Danny Lewis, William D. Lord, James S. Lucas, Gary P. McCully, Robert E. Ralls, Jerry Schwab v.

478 U.S. 421 (1986) LOCAL 28 OF THE SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION ET AL. No. 84-1656. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 25, 1986 Decided July 2, 1986 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *425 Mar

LOLLEY, J. |; Lance Elmore appeals a judgment from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Ouachita, State of Louisiana, setting his child support obligation for the minor child, L.P., in the amount of $570.00 per month plus administrative costs. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. Facts This matter started as a petition to establish paternity and sup

GARRETT, J. The plaintiffs, Michael H. Wainwright and T. Scott Pernici, filed a defamation suit against the defendants, Ollie Tyler, Mayor of Shreveport, and Brian Crawford, Chief Administrative Officer for Shreveport. The defendants filed a special motion to strike the petition under La. C.C.P. art. 971, which was granted by the trial court. The petition was stricken and the defendants were also awarded attorney fees. The plaintiff

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. Before the Court are Motions to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Yellowbook, Inc., successor in interest to Yellow Book USA (“Yellow-book”) [Docket Entry # 10] and Max Andrews (“Andrews”) [Docket Entry # 17]. For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment filed by Yellowboo

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SAM A. LINDSAY, District Judge. Before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, filed November 5, 2012. After careful consideration of the motion, response, reply, supplements, hearing and applicable law, the court grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs First Amende

ORDER KATHLEEN CARDONE, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered five motions in the above-captioned case, including Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 23; Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 24; Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Evidence, ECF No. 28; Plaintiffs Motion for an Oral Hearing, ECF No. 34; and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Evidence, ECF No. 37. For the reaso

Office of the Director New Mexico 11:51:30 2022.07.26 Compilation '00'06- Commission THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMSC-018 Filing Date: May 6, 2021 No. S-1-SC-38228 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, ex rel. M. KEITH RIDDLE, in his official capacity as Clerk of Catron County, and Chair of the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-2007 THOMAS BARWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF OAK PARK, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the No

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the majority opinion, in which Senior Judge ELLIS joined. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a dissenting opinion. *381OPINION MICHAEL, Circuit Judge: Phoenix Specialty Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Phoenix) appeals the district court’s determination, made after a bench trial, that the company te

433 B.R. 524 (2010) In re Donald L. VETAL, Jr., Debtor. Dragan Petrovic, Plaintiff v. Donald L. Vetal, Jr., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-20054-TJC. Adversary No. 09-639. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland, at Greenbelt. August 3, 2010. *525 Thomas C. Willcox, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. David W. Lease, Smit

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS — ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION OF INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS, AND DISMISS CLASS AND REPRESENTATIVE CLAIMS [22] DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 22,'2014, Plaintiff David L. Tot-ten filed an amended complaint in San Bernardino County Superior Court, alleging the following causes of a

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-942C (Filed: June 29, 2018) ********************** ROBERT S. DAVIDSON Copyright infringement; 28 U.S.C. § 1498(b); Originality; Plaintiff, Fair use; 17 U.S.C. § 107; Flat fee license; Running royalty; v.

JAN P. PATTERSON, Justice, dissenting. Following the parties’ agreed remand from federal court and a two-and-a-half week jury trial in the state district court, the majority sua sponte departs from the issues raised by the parties on appeal and undertakes its own fact-finding to vacate *81and dismiss the judgment rendered in favor of appellees,