⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Louis P English and Betty B English”

English v. Robbinspublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014-12-11 · Published · cited 6× · 2014 Ark. 511; 452 S.W.3d 566; 2014 Ark. LEXIS 641
COURTNEY HUDSON GOODSON, Associate Justice 11Appellants, P. Timothy English, M.D.; Family Medicine Clinic, P.A.; John Brun-ner, M.D.; and Heritage Physicians Group, P.A., appeal the circuit court’s order vacating a judgment entered in favor of appellants. Appellants argue that the circuit court erred in vacating the judgment because the grounds for a new trial were not discovered more than ninety days
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PEREZ, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ANNIE J. BUTLER, ANTHO
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued August 20, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PERE
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2019-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued August 20, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIER EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PERE
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988-03-02 · Published · cited 85× · 841 F.2d 282; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 2494; 1988 WL 16095
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: We consider the enforceability of an agreement to arbitrate claims arising out of a stock margin purchase agreement. Background On October 13, 1986, plaintiffs Jack B. and Betty L. Cohen entered into a Customer’s Margin Account Agreement with defendant Wedbush, Noble, Cook, Inc., a stock brokerage firm. T
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-05-04 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00276-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 5/4/2015 9:23:55 PM
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2025-05-01 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ark. 59
Cite as 2025 Ark. 59 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSION OF Opinion Delivered: May 1, 2025 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY 2025 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM The final deadline for attorneys to pay the 2025 annual attorney-license fee was April 15, 2025. As required by Rule VII(C)(9) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar, the clerk of t
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2005-03-17 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Dismissed and Opinion filed March 17, 2005 Reversed and Dismissed and Opinion filed March 17, 2005.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983-01-20 · Published · cited 265× · 456 A.2d 390; 92 N.J. 158; 1983 N.J. LEXIS 2344
92 N.J. 158 (1983) 456 A.2d 390 SOUTHERN BURLINGTON COUNTY N.A.A.C.P., CAMDEN COUNTY C.O.R.E., CAMDEN COUNTY N.A.A.C.P., ETHEL LAWRENCE, THOMASINE LAWRENCE, CATHERINE STILL, MARY E. SMITH, SHIRLEY MORRIS, JACQUELINE CURTIS, GLADYS CLARK, BETTY WEAL AND ANGEL PEREZ, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS, AND DAVIS ENTERPRISES, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR AND CROSS-RESPONDENT
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013-07-01 · Published · cited 13× · 721 F.3d 132; 107 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1361; 41 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2158; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13389; 2013 WL 3286232
PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-appellee The Authors Guild, an association of authors, as well as several individual authors (jointly, “plaintiffs”), began this suit in 2005, alleging that defendant-appellant Google Inc. (“Google”) committed copyright infringement through the Library Project of its “Google Books” search tool by scanning and indexing more than 20 million books and making a
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019-02-20 · Published · cited 13× · 598 B.R. 179
The Honorable Jeffery A. Deller, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the Court is an Expedited Joint Motion to Dismiss the Chapter 11 Case for Cause (the "Motion to Dismiss") filed by Don Murphy, Lorraine Dille Williams, Robert Nichols Flint Dille, and Team Angry Filmworks, Inc. Pursuant to the Motion to Dismiss, the movants make a number of contentions including the claim that the D
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018-03-09 · Published · cited 2× · 908 N.W.2d 831
ZAGER, Justice. The defendant, convicted of first-degree murder as a juvenile offender, challenges his sentence of life in prison with the possibility of parole after serving a minimum term of twenty-five-years confinement as determined by the district court. By means of a motion to correct an illegal sentence, the defendant challenges the sentencing scheme for juvenile offenders convic
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0856 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed June 17, 2022 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., and JILL MEADOWS, M.D., Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law mandating
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0856 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed June 17, 2022 Amended August 24, 2022 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., and JILL MEADOWS, M.D., Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge. In a case chall
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2022-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0856 Submitted February 23, 2022—Filed June 17, 2022 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND, INC., and JILL MEADOWS, M.D., Appellees, vs. KIM REYNOLDS ex rel. STATE OF IOWA and IOWA BOARD OF MEDICINE, Appellants. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Mitchell E. Turner, Judge. In a case challenging the constitutionality of a law mandating
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013-07-01 · Published · cited 0×
12-3200-cv Authors Guild Inc., et al. v. Google Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2012 (Argued On: May 8, 2013 Decided: July 1, 2013) Docket No. 12-3200-cv _______________________________________________________________ THE
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-05-27 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021-04-29 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2823-16 PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Respondent, April 29, 2021 APPELLATE DIVISION v
Kish v. Kusturapublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 1542; 190 Or. App. 458; 79 P.3d 337
ARMSTRONG, J. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment that reformed a contract for the sale of an apartment complex and awarded relief to defendant on the reformed contract. Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s reformation of the contract and its award of damages, attorney fees, and costs, arguing that defendant did not prove her reformation claim by clear and convincing evidence. We conclude that defendant did prove her cla
Supreme Court of Florida · 2024-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC2022-1050 ____________ PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA, et al., Petitioners, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., Respondents. ____________ No. SC2022-1127